Skip to main content

The Method of Cyclic Intrepid Projections: Convergence Analysis and Numerical Experiments

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover The Impact of Applications on Mathematics

Part of the book series: Mathematics for Industry ((MFI,volume 1))

Abstract

The convex feasibility problem asks to find a point in the intersection of a collection of nonempty closed convex sets. This problem is of basic importance in mathematics and the physical sciences, and projection (or splitting) methods solve it by employing the projection operators associated with the individual sets to generate a sequence which converges to a solution. Motivated by an application in road design, we present the method of cyclic intrepid projections (CycIP) and provide a rigorous convergence analysis. We also report on very promising numerical experiments in which CycIP is compared to a commerical state-of-the-art optimization solver.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Given a nonempty subset \(S\) of \(X\) and \(x\in X\), we write \(d_S(x) := \inf _{s\in S}\Vert x-s\Vert \) for the distance from \(x\) to \(S\). If \(S\) is also closed and convex, then the infimum defining \(d_S(x)\) is attained at a unique vector called the projection of \(x\) onto \(S\) and denoted by \(P_S(x)\) or \(P_Sx\).

  2. 2.

    This function is considered, e.g., in [7, Exercise 8.5].

  3. 3.

    In [5], the authors compared CycIP with a Swiss Army Knife. The Wenger Swiss Army Knife version XXL, listed in the Guinness Book of World Records as the world’s most multi-functional penknife, contains 87 tools.

  4. 4.

    Recall that if \(x=(\xi _1,\ldots ,\xi _n)\in X\), then \(\Vert x\Vert _\infty = \max \{|\xi _1|,\ldots ,|\xi _n|\}\).

  5. 5.

    For further information on performance profiles, we refer the reader to [14].

  6. 6.

    Recall that if \(x=(\xi _1,\ldots ,\xi _n)\in X\), then \(\Vert x\Vert _1 = |\xi _1|+\cdots +|\xi _n|\).

  7. 7.

    To allow for a more fair comparison, we included in wall-clock time only the time required for running the solver’s software itself (and not the time for loading the problem data or for setting up the solver’s parameters).

References

  1. Baillon, J.B., Bruck, R.E., Reich, S.: On the asymptotic behavior of nonexpansive mappings and semigroups in Banach spaces. Houston J. Math. 4, 1–9 (1978)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Bauschke, H.H., Borwein, J.M.: On projection algorithms for solving convex feasibility problems. SIAM Rev. 38, 367–426 (1996)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Bauschke, H.H., Combettes, P.L.: A weak-to-strong convergence principle for Fejér-monotone methods in Hilbert spaces. Math. Oper. Res. 26, 248–264 (2001)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Bauschke, H.H., Combettes, P.L.: Convex analysis and monotone operator theory in Hilbert spaces. Springer, New York (2011)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Bauschke, H.H., Koch, V.R.: Projection methods: swiss army knives for solving feasibility and best approximation problems with halfspaces. Contemporary Mathematics (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Borwein, J.M., Vanderwerff, J.D.: Convex functions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Boyd, S., Vandenberghe, L.: Convex optimization. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Cegielski, A.: Iterative methods for fixed point problems in Hilbert spaces. Springer, New York (2012)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Censor, Y., Zenios, S.A.: Parallel Optimization. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1997)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen, W., Herman, G.T.: Efficient controls for finitely convergent sequential al gorithms. ACM Trans. Math. Software 37, 14 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Combettes, P.L.: Hilbertian convex feasibility problems: convergence of projection methods. Appl. Math. Optim. 35, 311–330 (1997)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Combettes, P.L.: Inherently parallel algorithms in feasibility and optimization and their applications. In: Butnariu, D., Censor, Y., Reich, S. (eds.) Quasi-Fejérian analysis of some optimization algorithms, pp. 115–152. Elsevier, New York (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Combettes, P.L.: Solving monotone inclusions via compositions of nonexpansive averaged operators. Optimization 53, 475–504 (2004)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Dolan, E.D., Moré, J.J.: Benchmarking optimization software with performance profiles. Math. Program. (Ser. A) 91, 201–213 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Goebel, K., Kirk, W.A.: Topics in metric fixed point theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1990)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Goebel, K., Reich, S.: Uniform convexity, hyperbolic geometry, and nonexpansive mappings. Marcel Dekker, New York (1984)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Gurobi optimization Inc: gurobi optimizer reference manual. http://www.gurobi.com, (2013)

  18. Herman, G.T.: A relaxation method for reconstructing objects from noisy x-rays. Math. Program. 8, 1–19 (1975)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Herman, G.T.: Fundamentals of computerized tomography: image reconstruction from projections, 2nd edn. Springer, New York (2009)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Hundal, H.: An alternating projection that does not converge in norm. Nonlinear Anal. 57, 35–61 (2004)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Rockafellar, R.T., Wets, R.J.-B.: Variational analysis. Springer-Verlag, New York (1998)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Slavakis, K., Yamada, I.: The adaptive projected subgradient method constrained by families of quasi-nonexpansive mappings and its applicaton to online learning. SIAM J. Optim. 23, 126–152 (2013)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Yamada, I., Ogura, N.: Hybrid steepest descent method for variational inequality problem over the fixed point set of certain quasi-nonexpansive mappings. Numer. Funct. Anal. Optim. 25, 619–655 (2004)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Yamada, I., Yukawa, M., Yamagishi, M.: Minimizing the moreau envelope of nonsmooth convex functions over the fixed point set of certain quasi-nonexpansive mappings. In: Bauschke, H.H., Burachik, R.S., Combettes, P.L., Elser, V., Luke, D.R., Wolkowicz, H. (eds.) Fixed-point algorithms for inverse problems in science and engineering, springer optimization and its applications, pp. 345–390. Springer, New York (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the referee for very careful reading and constructive comments, Dr. Ramon Lawrence for the opportunity to run the numerical experiments on his server, and Scott Fazackerley and Wade Klaver for technical help. HHB also thanks Dr. Masato Wakayama and the Institute of Mathematics for Industry, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan for their hospitality —some of this research benefited from the extremely stimulating environment during the “Math-for-Industry 2013” forum. HHB was partially supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (Discovery Grant and Accelerator Supplement) and by the Canada Research Chair Program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heinz H. Bauschke .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Japan

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bauschke, H.H., Iorio, F., Koch, V.R. (2014). The Method of Cyclic Intrepid Projections: Convergence Analysis and Numerical Experiments. In: Wakayama, M., et al. The Impact of Applications on Mathematics. Mathematics for Industry, vol 1. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54907-9_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54907-9_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo

  • Print ISBN: 978-4-431-54906-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-4-431-54907-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics