Overview of Robotic Surgery

  • Kenoki Ohuchida
  • Makoto Hashizume


The number of minimally invasive surgeries has increased rapidly with the development of endoscopic devices and procedures. Endoscopic surgical procedures are usually performed within a body cavity such as the abdomen or chest and visualized with laparoscopy or thoracoscopy, with two-dimensional conventional scopes. In 1987, the initial laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed (Reynolds, JSLS 5(1):89–94, 2001). Then, the implications for endoscopic surgery have continuously expanded, and endoscopic surgery is currently the standard in many surgical fields. Advantages in endoscopic surgery are less postoperative pain, shorter hospital stays, and an earlier return to daily activities for many patients. However, for endoscopic procedures, surgeons need several skills that have never been needed for conventional open surgery. The surgeon needs to coordinate his/her eyes and hands with mentally interpreting a two-dimensional environment as a three-dimensional one. Furthermore, the surgeon needs to acquire a skillful manner using long-shaft instruments. Therefore, performing endoscopic procedures is more physically and mentally demanding for most of the surgeons than performing an open procedure.

Recently, to support such minimum invasive surgery, a robotic system was developed. A robotic system has already resolved some of the problems related to laparoscopic surgery. The robotic system provides surgeons with super vision and super hand techniques, which have remarkably changed surgery in various fields (Hashizume et al., Surgery 131:S330–S333, 2002; Ballantyne, Surg Endosc 16(10):1389–1402, 2002). Generally, robotic system provides master manipulators, which the surgeon can use to control the movements of patient-side arms and hands with the surgical instruments and the endoscope. The surgeon looks at a display monitor that presents images obtained through an endoscopic camera inside the patient’s body. The surgeon looks down into the monitor on his hands as if looking into the surgical field. The surgeon holds the control handles with his left and right hands, respectively. When the surgeon moves the manipulators on the surgeon’s site, the patient-side manipulators closely follow the input motions. This master–slave system makes it possible for surgeons to perform more precise surgical procedures than those available in conventional laparoscopic surgery. Although clinical benefits of robotic system for most surgical procedures remain to be proven, robotic surgery has already been spreading and available worldwide in the various surgical fields.


Laparoscopic Surgery Robotic System Robotic Surgery Surgical System Intuitive Surgical 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Amodeo A, Linares Quevedo A, Joseph JV, Belgrano E, Patel HR (2009) Robotic laparoscopic surgery: cost and training [Review]. Minerva Urol Nefrol (Ital J Urol Nephrol) 61(2):121–128Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arata J, Takahashi H, Pitakwatchara P, Warisawa S, Tanoue K, Konishi K, Ieiri S, Shimizu S, Nakashima N, Okamura K, Fujino Y, Ueda Y, Chotiwan P, Mitsuishi M, Hashizume M (2007) A remote surgery experiment between Japan and Thailand over internet using a low latency CODEC system. In: IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, Roma, Italy, pp 10–14Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Arata J, Kenmotsu H, Takagi M, Hori T, Miyagi T, Fujimoto H, Kajita Y, Hayashi Y, Chinzei K, Hashizume M (2013) Surgical bedside master console for neurosurgical robotic system. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 8(1):75–86PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ballantyne GH (2002) Robotic surgery, telerobotic surgery, telepresence, and telementoring. Review of early clinical results [Review]. Surg Endosc 16(10):1389–1402PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cowley G (1992) Introducing “Robodoc”. A robot finds his calling: in the operating room. Newsweek 120(21):86PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Haber GP, Crouzet S, Kamoi K, Berger A, Aron M, Goel R et al (2008) Robotic NOTES (natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery) in reconstructive urology: initial laboratory experience [Evaluation studies]. Urology 71(6):996–1000PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hashizume M, Sugimachi K (2003) Robot-assisted gastric surgery. Surg Clin North Am 83(6):1429–1444PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hashizume M, Konishi K, Tsutsumi N, Yamaguchi S, Shimabukuro R (2002) A new era of robotic surgery assisted by a computer-enhanced surgical system [Review]. Surgery 131(1 Suppl):S330–S333PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Himpens J, Leman G, Cadiere GB (1998) Telesurgical laparoscopic cholecystectomy [Case reports letter]. Surg Endosc 12(8):1091PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Isogaki J, Haruta S, Man IM, Suda K, Kawamura Y, Yoshimura F et al (2011) Robot-assisted surgery for gastric cancer: experience at our institute. Pathobiol J Immunopathol Mol Cell Biol 78(6):328–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kakeji Y, Konishi K, Ieiri S, Yasunaga T, Nakamoto M, Tanoue K et al (2006) Robotic laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: a comparison of the da Vinci and Zeus systems. [Comparative study evaluation studies research support, Non-U.S. gov’t]. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg (MRCAS) 2(4):299–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kalan I, Turgut D, Aksoy S, Dede DS, Dizdar O, Ozisik Y et al (2010) Clinical and pathological characteristics of breast cancer patients with history of cesarean delivery [Letter]. Breast 19(1):67–68PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kalloo AN, Singh VK, Jagannath SB, Niiyama H, Hill SL, Vaughn CA et al (2004) Flexible transgastric peritoneoscopy: a novel approach to diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in the peritoneal cavity. [Research support, Non-U.S. gov’t]. Gastrointest Endosc 60(1):114–117PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kaouk JH, Goel RK, Haber GP, Crouzet S, Stein RJ (2009) Robotic single-port transumbilical surgery in humans: initial report [Evaluation studies]. BJU Int 103(3):366–369PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kobayashi Y, Sekiguchi Y, Tomono Y, Watanabe H, Toyoda K, Konishi K et al. (2010) Design of a surgical robot with dynamic vision field control for single port endoscopic surgery [Research support, Non-U.S. Gov’t]. In: Conference proceedings: annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society, Buenos Aires, Argentina, pp 979–983Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kobayashi Y, Tomono Y, Sekiguchi Y, Watanabe H, Toyoda K, Konishi K et al (2010) A surgical robot with vision field control for single port endoscopic surgery [Research support, Non-U.S. gov’t]. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg (MRCAS) 6(4):454–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kwoh YS, Hou J, Jonckheere EA, Hayati S (1988) A robot with improved absolute positioning accuracy for CT guided stereotactic brain surgery. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 35(2):153–160PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Marescaux J, Leroy J, Gagner M, Rubino F, Mutter D, Vix M et al (2001) Transatlantic robot-assisted telesurgery. Nature 413(6854):379–380PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ostrowitz MB, Eschete D, Zemon H, DeNoto G (2009) Robotic-assisted single-incision right colectomy: early experience. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg (MRCAS) 5(4):465–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ragupathi M, Ramos-Valadez DI, Pedraza R, Haas EM (2010) Robotic-assisted single-incision laparoscopic partial cecectomy [Case reports]. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg (MRCAS) 6(3):362–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Reynolds W Jr (2001) The first laparoscopic cholecystectomy [Biography historical article portraits]. JSLS 5(1):89–94PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Suh I, Mukherjee M, Oleynikov D, Siu KC (2011) Training program for fundamental surgical skill in robotic laparoscopic surgery. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg (MRCAS) 7(3):327–333Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Suzuki N, Hattori A, Ieiri S, Konishi K, Maeda T, Fujino Y, Ueda Y, Navicharern P, Tanoue K, Hashizume M (2009) Tele-control of an endoscopic surgical robot system between Japan and Thailand for tele-NOTES. Stud Health Technol Inform 142:374–379PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yoshino I, Hashizume M, Shimada M, Tomikawa M, Sugimachi K (2002) Video-assisted thoracoscopic extirpation of a posterior mediastinal mass using the da Vinci computer enhanced surgical system [Case reports]. Ann Thorac Surg 74(4):1235–1237PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Advanced Medical Initiatives, Graduate School of Medical SciencesKyushu UniversityFukuokaJapan

Personalised recommendations