Skip to main content

Network Analysis of Production and Its Renewal

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Evolutionary Foundations of Economic Science

Part of the book series: Evolutionary Economics and Social Complexity Science ((EESCS,volume 1))

  • 745 Accesses

Abstract

Without positioning a production system, it is impossible to imagine any economic doctrine. During recent years, however, many economists have been very reluctant to use actual observations on the structure of production systems and heterogeneous interactions among production processes, i.e., inter-industrial analysis, and commit to a positive picture of production in society. Instead, they have focused on a particular idea of the production function, where the aggregate level is very similar to the microscopic one. The representative agent is ubiquitous in standard economics, across the globe and historically. As Robert C. Allen (2011) noted, some economists do not hesitate to subordinate even human history into a special production function. They stress behavioral decisions by game theoretic analysis to dispense with productive structural analysis. In this chapter, we will examine the meaning of a price system based on the production system in the sense of classical economic doctrines, and will then give a new network analysis of production and consider its empirical application to the Japanese economy over recent years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See Aruka (19912012). The precise mathematical derivation of this balancing proportion was firstly given by Schefold (1976a,b).

  2. 2.

    See “Updating a standard commodity” in Aruka (2012, p. 180).

  3. 3.

    This opinion was given by him when I visited his office at TUM in Munich, March 2012.

  4. 4.

    See, for example, Thompson (1956), Nikaido (1968), and Morishima (1969) as for the basic ideas of the economic system.

  5. 5.

    Source: The pamphlet Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (2012).

  6. 6.

    This usually means that non-negative elements are found either in each row or each column. This situation is irrelevant to the idea of net producibility. All-entering in a strict sense means that most cells are non-positive. This property is always satisfied in the input–output matrix.

  7. 7.

    See Perron (1907) and Frobenius (1912). See, for example, Nikaido (1968) for a fine proof of the nonnegative solutions in the economic system.

  8. 8.

    The current members of the program are the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications (coordinator), the Cabinet Office, the Financial Services Agency, the Ministry of Finance, the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism, and the Ministry of Environment. See http://www.stat.go.jp/english/data/io/outline.htm.

  9. 9.

    In this definition, we will be faced with the difficulty of infinity if the system under consideration is disconnected, but another definition is possible to avoid this. See Opsahl et al. (2010).

  10. 10.

    Our observation, either in terms of technological property or of data availability, may be supplemented by Ohkubo’s rule. Ohkubo and Yasuda (2005) and Ohkubo et al. (2006) proved the equivalence between a Polya urn process and a renewal of the network spanned by a closed number of links. Taking into account that a finite set of productive processes on the input–output table is given, and using Ohkubo’s rule, we can show a renewal process of the network of production under the preferential attachment within the closed set of links. Here we regard a replacement of link attachment as a replacement of a productive process.

  11. 11.

    See the METI report: http://www.meti.go.jp/statistics/tyo/entyoio/result/result_14/pdf/h2eio101j.pdf.

  12. 12.

    Covariance analysis of household demand in Japan assisted by the random matrix theory can be found in Aruka et al. (2013).

References

  • Arthur WB (1994) Increasing returns and path dependence in the economy. University of Michigan Press, Michigan

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur WB (2009) The nature of technology. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Aruka Y (1991) Generalized Goodwin theorems on general coordinates. Struct Change Econ Dyn 2(1):69–91. Reprinted in Wood JC (ed) Piero Sraffa: critical assessments, IV (1996). Routledge, London; and also incorporated in Aruka (2011) Complexities of Production and Interacting Human Behaviour

    Google Scholar 

  • Aruka Y (2012) Some evolutionary interpretations of the economic systems of Piero Sraffa and John von Neumann in the light of comlexitiy. In: Ikeda Y, Yagi K (eds) Subjectivism and objectivism in the history of economic thought, Chapter 10. Routledge, London, pp 162–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Aruka Y, Koyama Y (2011) The matching of interactive agents in the future stock market and the U-Mart experiment. In: Caspari V (ed) The evolution of economic theory: essays in honour of Bertram Schefold. Routledge, London, pp 145–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Aruka Y, Kichikawa Y, Iytomi Y (2013) A macroscopic order of consumer demand due to heterogenous consumer behaviors on Japanese household demand tested by the random matrix theory. In: Abergel F, Aoyama H, Chakrabarti BK, Chakraborti A, Ghosh A (eds) Econophysics of agent-based models, 2014, Chapter 10. New Economic Windows Series. Springer Italia, Milan, pp 187–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheong SA, Fornia RP, Lee G, Jun Liang Kok J, Yim W, Xu D, Zhang Y (2012) The Japanese economy in crises: a time series segmentation study. Economics 6 (2012-5). http://dx.doi.org/10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2012-5

  • Freeman LC (1978/1979) Centrality in social networks: conceptual clarification. Soc Netw 1(3):215–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Frobenius G (1912) Ub̈er Matrizen aus nicht negativen Elementen. Sitzungsber. Königl. Preuss. Akad. Wiss., Berlin, pp 456–477

    Google Scholar 

  • Gale D (1956) The closed linear model of production. In: Kuhn HW, Tucker AW (eds) Linear inequalities and related systems. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 285–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland JH (1992) Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland JH (1995) Hidden order: how adaptation builds complexity. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Leontief W (1966) Input-output economics. Oxford University Press, New York (1st edn. 1966, 2nd edn. 1986)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (2012) Statistics at METI. Reprinted in http://www.meti.go.jp/english/statistics/pamphlet/h24st_en.pdf

  • Morishima M (1969) Theory of economic growth. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nikaido H (1968) Convex structures and economic theory. Academic, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohkubo J, Yasuda M (2005) Preferential urn model and nongrowing complex networks. Phys Rev E 72:1–4. 065104

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohkubo J, Yasuda M, Tanaka K (2006) Replica analysis of preferential urn mode. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 75(7):1–6. Article No. 074802. Erratum: 76(4), Article No. 048001 (2007, April)

    Google Scholar 

  • Opsahl T, Agneessens F, Skvoretz J (2010) Node centrality in weighted networks: generalizing degree and shortest paths. Soc Netw 32(3):245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perron O (1907) Zur Theorie der Matrices. Math Ann 64(2):248–263. doi:10.1007/BF01449896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schefold B (1976a) Relative prices as a function of the rate of profit. Zeitschriftfür Nationalökonomie 36:21–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schefold B (1976b) Nachwort. In: Sraffa P (ed) Waren-produktionmittels Waren. Suhrkamp Verlag, Frankfurt am Main, pp 129–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Sraffa P (1960) Production of commodities by means of commodities. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson GL (1956) On the solution of game theoretic problem. In Kuhn HW, Tucker AW (eds) Linear inequalities and related systems. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 274–282

    Google Scholar 

  • von Neumann J (1937) Über ein konomisches Gleichungssystem und eine Verallgemeinung des Brouwerschen Fixpunktsatzes. Ergebnisse eines Mathematischen Kollquiums, vol 8. Franz-Deuticcke, Leipniz and Wien, pp 73–83 [transl. A model of general economic equilibrium. Rev Econ Stud 13(1945–1946):1–9]

    Google Scholar 

  • Walras L (1874) Éĺements d’économie politique pure, ou théorie de la richesse sociale (Elements of Pure Economics, or the theory of social wealth, transl. W. Jaffé), 1874 (1899, 4th edn; 1926, rev edn, 1954, Engl. transl.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman S, Faust K (1994) Social network analysis. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Japan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Aruka, Y. (2015). Network Analysis of Production and Its Renewal. In: Evolutionary Foundations of Economic Science. Evolutionary Economics and Social Complexity Science, vol 1. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54844-7_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics