Advertisement

Network Analysis of Production and Its Renewal

  • Yuji Aruka
Chapter
Part of the Evolutionary Economics and Social Complexity Science book series (EESCS, volume 1)

Abstract

Without positioning a production system, it is impossible to imagine any economic doctrine. During recent years, however, many economists have been very reluctant to use actual observations on the structure of production systems and heterogeneous interactions among production processes, i.e., inter-industrial analysis, and commit to a positive picture of production in society. Instead, they have focused on a particular idea of the production function, where the aggregate level is very similar to the microscopic one. The representative agent is ubiquitous in standard economics, across the globe and historically. As Robert C. Allen (2011) noted, some economists do not hesitate to subordinate even human history into a special production function. They stress behavioral decisions by game theoretic analysis to dispense with productive structural analysis. In this chapter, we will examine the meaning of a price system based on the production system in the sense of classical economic doctrines, and will then give a new network analysis of production and consider its empirical application to the Japanese economy over recent years.

Keywords

Minimum Span Tree Equilibrium Price Price System Output Table Input Matrix 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Arthur WB (1994) Increasing returns and path dependence in the economy. University of Michigan Press, MichiganGoogle Scholar
  2. Arthur WB (2009) The nature of technology. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Aruka Y (1991) Generalized Goodwin theorems on general coordinates. Struct Change Econ Dyn 2(1):69–91. Reprinted in Wood JC (ed) Piero Sraffa: critical assessments, IV (1996). Routledge, London; and also incorporated in Aruka (2011) Complexities of Production and Interacting Human BehaviourGoogle Scholar
  4. Aruka Y (2012) Some evolutionary interpretations of the economic systems of Piero Sraffa and John von Neumann in the light of comlexitiy. In: Ikeda Y, Yagi K (eds) Subjectivism and objectivism in the history of economic thought, Chapter 10. Routledge, London, pp 162–184Google Scholar
  5. Aruka Y, Koyama Y (2011) The matching of interactive agents in the future stock market and the U-Mart experiment. In: Caspari V (ed) The evolution of economic theory: essays in honour of Bertram Schefold. Routledge, London, pp 145–167Google Scholar
  6. Aruka Y, Kichikawa Y, Iytomi Y (2013) A macroscopic order of consumer demand due to heterogenous consumer behaviors on Japanese household demand tested by the random matrix theory. In: Abergel F, Aoyama H, Chakrabarti BK, Chakraborti A, Ghosh A (eds) Econophysics of agent-based models, 2014, Chapter 10. New Economic Windows Series. Springer Italia, Milan, pp 187–201Google Scholar
  7. Cheong SA, Fornia RP, Lee G, Jun Liang Kok J, Yim W, Xu D, Zhang Y (2012) The Japanese economy in crises: a time series segmentation study. Economics 6 (2012-5). http://dx.doi.org/10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2012-5
  8. Freeman LC (1978/1979) Centrality in social networks: conceptual clarification. Soc Netw 1(3):215–239Google Scholar
  9. Frobenius G (1912) Ub̈er Matrizen aus nicht negativen Elementen. Sitzungsber. Königl. Preuss. Akad. Wiss., Berlin, pp 456–477Google Scholar
  10. Gale D (1956) The closed linear model of production. In: Kuhn HW, Tucker AW (eds) Linear inequalities and related systems. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 285–330Google Scholar
  11. Holland JH (1992) Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  12. Holland JH (1995) Hidden order: how adaptation builds complexity. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Leontief W (1966) Input-output economics. Oxford University Press, New York (1st edn. 1966, 2nd edn. 1986)Google Scholar
  14. Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (2012) Statistics at METI. Reprinted in http://www.meti.go.jp/english/statistics/pamphlet/h24st_en.pdf
  15. Morishima M (1969) Theory of economic growth. Clarendon Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Nikaido H (1968) Convex structures and economic theory. Academic, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Ohkubo J, Yasuda M (2005) Preferential urn model and nongrowing complex networks. Phys Rev E 72:1–4. 065104Google Scholar
  18. Ohkubo J, Yasuda M, Tanaka K (2006) Replica analysis of preferential urn mode. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 75(7):1–6. Article No. 074802. Erratum: 76(4), Article No. 048001 (2007, April)Google Scholar
  19. Opsahl T, Agneessens F, Skvoretz J (2010) Node centrality in weighted networks: generalizing degree and shortest paths. Soc Netw 32(3):245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Perron O (1907) Zur Theorie der Matrices. Math Ann 64(2):248–263. doi: 10.1007/BF01449896 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Schefold B (1976a) Relative prices as a function of the rate of profit. Zeitschriftfür Nationalökonomie 36:21–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Schefold B (1976b) Nachwort. In: Sraffa P (ed) Waren-produktionmittels Waren. Suhrkamp Verlag, Frankfurt am Main, pp 129–226Google Scholar
  23. Sraffa P (1960) Production of commodities by means of commodities. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  24. Thompson GL (1956) On the solution of game theoretic problem. In Kuhn HW, Tucker AW (eds) Linear inequalities and related systems. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 274–282Google Scholar
  25. von Neumann J (1937) Über ein konomisches Gleichungssystem und eine Verallgemeinung des Brouwerschen Fixpunktsatzes. Ergebnisse eines Mathematischen Kollquiums, vol 8. Franz-Deuticcke, Leipniz and Wien, pp 73–83 [transl. A model of general economic equilibrium. Rev Econ Stud 13(1945–1946):1–9]Google Scholar
  26. Walras L (1874) Éĺements d’économie politique pure, ou théorie de la richesse sociale (Elements of Pure Economics, or the theory of social wealth, transl. W. Jaffé), 1874 (1899, 4th edn; 1926, rev edn, 1954, Engl. transl.)Google Scholar
  27. Wasserman S, Faust K (1994) Social network analysis. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yuji Aruka
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of CommerceChuo UniversityHachioijiJapan

Personalised recommendations