Historical Reviews Around Evolving Ideas of the Invisible Hand

  • Yuji Aruka
Part of the Evolutionary Economics and Social Complexity Science book series (EESCS, volume 1)


This book aims to identify several points at which new economic theories diverged from the old by providing an overview of the traditional theories. The market is now dominated by the influence of financial speculation. That is to say, speculation has long since passed its original function. We can no longer remain in the domain of traditional definitions around markets. So our retrospection of traditional economics is limited to special interests. We do, however, give a quick characterization of the economy first, and we will then discuss historical ideas.


Financial Market Reputation System Neoclassical Economic Invisible Hand Ordinary Life 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Anderson J (1777) An enquiry into the nature of the Corn laws. Extract from an inquiry into the corn laws. http://www.efm.bris.ac.uk/het/anderson/rent
  2. Arrow KJ, Debreu G (1954) Existence of a competitive equilibrium for a competitive economy. Econometrica 22(3):205–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arrow KJ, Hahn F (1971) General competitive analysis. Holden-Day, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  4. Arthur WB (2009) The nature of technology. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Aruka Y (2001a) Avatamsaka game structure and experiment on the web. In: Aruka Y (ed) Evolutionary controversies in economics. Springer, Tokyo, pp 115–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Aruka Y (2001b) Avatamsaka game experiment as a nonlinear Polya Urn process. In: Terano T, Namatame A, et al (eds) New frontiers on artificial intelligence. Springer, Berlin, pp 153–161. Reprinted in Aruka (2011, Chap. 11)Google Scholar
  7. Aruka Y (2004). Exploring the limitations of utilitarian epistemology to economic science in view of interacting heterogeneity. Ann Jpn Assoc Philos Sci 13(1):27–44. Reprinted in Aruka (2011, Chap. 7)Google Scholar
  8. Aruka Y (2007) The moral science of heterogeneous economic interaction in the face of complexity. In: Leiber T (Hg) Dynamisches Denken und Handeln Philosophie und Wissenschaft in einer komplexen Welt Festschrift fuer Klaus Mainzer zum 60. Geburtstag S. Hirzel Verlag, Stuttgart, pp 171–183. Reprinted in Aruka (2011, Chap. 9)Google Scholar
  9. Aruka Y (2011) Complexities of production and interacting human behaviour. Physica Verlag, HeidelbergCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Aruka Y (2012) Some evolutionary interpretations of the economic systems of Piero Sraffa and John von Neumann in the light of comlexitiy. In: Ikeda Y, Yagi, K (eds) Subjectivism and objectivism in the history of economic thought, chapter 10. Routledge, New York, pp 162–184Google Scholar
  11. Aruka Y, Akiyama E (2009) Non-self-averaging of a two-person game with only positive spillover: a new formulation of Avatamsakas dilemma. J Econ Interact Coordination 4(2):135–161. Reprinted in Aruka (2011, Chap. 12)Google Scholar
  12. Aruka Y, Koyama Y (2011) The matching of interactive agents in the future stock market and the U-Mart experiment. In: Caspari V (ed) The evolution of economic theory: essays in honour of Bertram Schefold. Routledge, London, pp 145–167Google Scholar
  13. Asano Y (1998) Mozi (in Japanese). Kodansha,TokyoGoogle Scholar
  14. Black F, Scholes M (1973) The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. J Political Econ 81(3):637–654. doi: 10.1086/260062 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bliss CJ (1972) Prices, markets and planning. Econ J 82(325):87–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cabinet Office Japan (2010) National accounts for 2010. http://www.esri.cao.go.jp/en/sna/data/kakuhou/files/2010/24annual_report_e.html
  17. Chen P (2008) Equilibrium illusion, economic complexity and evolutionary foundation in economic analysis. Evol Inst Econ Rev 5(1):81–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chen P (2013) Interview with Ping Chen: economic complexity, equilibrium illusion, economics in China. World Econ Assoc Newslett 3(4). http://www.worldeconomicsassociation.org/newsletterarticles/interview-with-ping-chen
  19. Debreu G (1959) Theory of value: an axiomatic analysis of economic equilibrium. Wiley, New York. [Reprint, Yale University Press, New Haven, 1971]Google Scholar
  20. Felsenthal M, Zuill L (2008) AIG gets $150 billion government bailout; posts huge loss, Reuter Washington/New York. Monday, Nov 10, 2008, 2:28 pm EST. http://www.reuters.com/article/2008/11/10/us-aig-idUSTRE4A92FM20081110
  21. Frank R, Cook PJ (1995) The winner-take-all society: why the few at the top get so much more than the rest of us. Penguin Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Gelleri C (2013) Chiemgauer Statistik: Erläeuterung zu den Chiemgauer-Kennzahlen, Chiemgauer e. V (association). http://www.chiemgauer.info/uploads/media/Chiemgauer-Statistik_01.pdf
  23. Gesell S (1916) Die natürliche Wirtschaftsordnung durch Freiland und Freigeld. Selbstverlag, Les Hauts Geneveys; 9. Auflage herausgegeben von Karl Walker: Rudolf Zitzmann Verlag, Lauf 1949; The natural economic order, Revised edn. Peter Owen, London (1958) (translated by Philip Pye MA); Full text from library economics liberty. http://www.community-exchange.org/docs/Gesell/en/neo/
  24. Gossen HH (1854) Die Entwickelung der Gesetze des menschlichen Verkehrs, und der daraus flieenden Regeln für menschliches Handeln Vieweg, Braunschweig [Translated into English as The laws of human relations and the rules of human action derived therefrom (1983)] MIT Press.Google Scholar
  25. Habib MM (2010) Excess returns on net foreign assets: the exorbitant privilege from a global perspective. European Central Bank, Working Paper Series, vol 1158. www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpwps/ecbwp1158.pdf
  26. Hayek FA (1945) The use of knowledge in society. Am Econ Rev 35(4):519–530Google Scholar
  27. Helbing D (2013a) How and why our conventional economic thinking causes global crises. http://futurict.blogspot.ie/2013/04/how-and-why-our-conventional-economic_8.html
  28. Helbing D (2013b) A new kind of economy is born social decision-makers beat the “Homo Economicus”. Evol Inst Econ Rev 10(1):3–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Helbing D (2013c) A new kind of economy is born social decision-makers beat the “Homo Economicus”. http://arxiv.org/pdf/1309.7453.pdf
  30. Helbing D, Kirman A (2013) Rethinking economics using complexity theory Real-world Economics Review (64):23–51. http://www.paecon.net/PAEReview/issue64/whole64.pdf
  31. Hildenbrand W (1994) Market demand. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  32. IBM (2012) 2012 IBM Annual Report (IBM2012, 9). http://www.ibm.com/annualreport/2012/bin/assets/2012_ibm_annual.pdf
  33. Jevons WS (1871) The theory of political economy. Macmillan, London. Full text from library economics liberty: http://www.econlib.org/library/YPDBooks/Jevons/jvnPE.html
  34. Laroche M, Bergeron J, Goutaland C (2001) A three-dimensional scale of intangibility. J Serv Res 4(1):26–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. List F (1841) Das nationale System der politischen Ökonomie, Cotta’schen Verlag, Stuttgart. In: Shield Nicholson J (ed) Das nationale System der politischen Ökonomie (1910). https://archive.org/details/dasnationalesys00list [English translation 1952, Lloyd SS (trans.) The national system of political economy. http://www.econlib.org/library/YPDBooks/List/lstNPE.html]
  36. Lovelock C, Gummesson E (2004) Whither service marketing? In serach of a new paradigm and fresh perspectives. J Serv Res 7(1):20–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Macfie AL (1967) The individual in society. Allen & Unwin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  38. Mainzer K (2007) Der kreative Zufall: Wie das Neue in die Welt kommt? C. H. Beck, MunichGoogle Scholar
  39. Mainzer K (2010) Leben als Maschine?: Von der Systembiologie zur Robotik und Knstlichen Intelligenz. Mentis, PaderbornGoogle Scholar
  40. Marshall A (1890) Principles of economics, 8th edn. Macmillan, London. Full text from Library Economics Liberty: www.econlib.org/library/Marshall/marP1.html
  41. Maynard Smith J (1982) Evolution and the theory of games. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Maynard Smith J, Price GR (1973) The logic of animal conflict. Nature 246(5427):15–18. Bibcode:1973 Natur.24615S. doi: 10.1038/246015a0
  43. Menger C (1871) Principles of economics [Translated by Dingwall J, Hoselitz BF, with an introduction by Hayek FA. New York University Press, New York (1981)]Google Scholar
  44. Miura B (2001) KAGEN: Vom Ursprung des Wertes. Faksimile der zwischen 1773 und 1789 entstandenen Handschrift, commented by Bertram Schefold et al [Ttransl. Komuro M, Tanaka H, Yagi K, Verlag Wirtschaft und Finanzen, Verlagsgruppe Handelsblatt GmbH, D’́useeldorf]Google Scholar
  45. Mozi(Mo-tzu) (1934) Book 7, Will of Heaven 1 in Mohism. Chinese Text Project: Chinese Text Project:http://ctext.org/mohism
  46. Pariser E (2012) Filter bubble. Carl Hanser, MunichCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Petras J (2012) The ascendancy of a criminal financial elite, global research, August 05, 2012. http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-ascendancy-of-a-criminal-financial-elite/32220?print=1
  48. Ricardo D (1817) The principles of political economy and taxation. Full text from library economics liberty: http://www.econlib.org/library/Ricardo/ricP.html
  49. Robbins L (1932) An essay on the nature and significance of economic science. Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  50. Schwarz JT (1961) Lectures on mathematical method in analytical economics. Gordon and Breach, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  51. Shibusawa E (2009) Shibusawa’s speech at the Imperial Institute of Invention and Innovation, June 13, 1923 in Shiubsawa Memorial Museum (ed.) Guide to the Exhibits Shibusawa Memorial Museum, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  52. Shiozawa Y (2007) A new construction of ricardian trade theory. A many-country, many-commodity case with intermediate goods and choice of production techniques. Evol Inst Eco Rev 4(1):141–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Shiozawa Y, Matsui H, Taniguchi K, Nakajima Y, Koyama Y, Hahimoto F (2008) Artificial market experiments with the U-mart system. Springer, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  54. Smith A (1776) An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. Full text from library economics liberty: http://www.econlib.org/library/Smith/smWN.html
  55. Sraffa P (1960) Production of commodities by means of commodities. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  56. Sun Zu (515 BCE-512 BCE) The art of war. Chinese Text Project: http://ctext.org/art-of-war [Sun Tzu translated and annotated by Giles L (2005) The art of war by Sun Tzu - Special Edition. El Paso Norte Press]
  57. Vargo SL, Lusch RF (2004a) Evolving new dominant logic for marketing. J Mark 68(1):1–17. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.
  58. Vargo SL, Lusch RF (2004b) The four service marketing myths: remnants of a goods-based, manufacturing model. J Serv Res 6(4):324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. von Neumann J (1937) er ein konomisches Gleichungssystem und eine Verallgemeinung des Brouwerschen Fixpunktsatzes. Ergebnisse eines Mathematischen Kollquiums 8. Franz-Deuticcke, Leipniz and Wien, pp 73–83 [transl. A model of general economic equilibrium. Rev Econ Studies 13:1–9 (1945–1946)]Google Scholar
  60. von Neumann J, Morgenstern O (1944) Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  61. Walras L (1874) Éĺements d’économie politique pure, ou théorie de la richesse sociale (Elements of pure economics, or the theory of social wealth, transl. W. Jaffé) [1899, 4th edn.; 1926, rev edn., 1954, Engl. transl.]Google Scholar
  62. Weidlich W (2010) Normal and critical evolution in sociodynamics. Evol Inst Econ Rev 6(2): 329–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Weidlich H, Haag G (1983) Concepts and models of quantitative sociology. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yuji Aruka
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of CommerceChuo UniversityHachioijiJapan

Personalised recommendations