Advertisement

Effects of Sustainable Energy Facilities on Landscape: A Case Study of Slovakia

  • Katarina PavlickovaEmail author
  • Anna Miklosovicova
  • Monika Vyskupova
Chapter
Part of the Ecological Research Monographs book series (ECOLOGICAL)

Abstract

Sustainable energy, known as renewable energy, is the provision of energy that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations. As sustainable energy sources, those most often regarded are hydroelectricity, solar energy, wind energy, geothermal energy, and biomass energy. The impacts of increased sustainable production and consumption are considerably less than the increased supply and the consumption of conventionally produced energy. However, we have to take into consideration also negative effects of new renewable production energy facilities, mainly on the landscape and its characteristics. Their localization could be considered as a factor that affects future settlements’ development: this can be perceived not only as a facility reducing the amount of “green gas emissions” but also as a separate construction in the landscape.

The intent of this contribution is to mention specific aspects of environmental impact assessment of sustainable energy facilities with the emphasis on the role of landscape and landscape ecological evaluation in the Slovak Republic.

Keywords

Cumulative effects Ecological stability Environmental impact assessment Landscape Slovakia Sustainable energy 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We express our gratitude to the Slovak VEGA grant system for supporting our project 1/0544/11 as a basis for our research.

References

  1. Abaza H, Bisset R, Sadler B (2004) Environmental impact assessment and strategic environmental assessment: towards an integrated approach. UNEP, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  2. Act of National Council of the Slovak Republic No. 127/1994 Coll. on environmental impact assessmentGoogle Scholar
  3. Act of National Council of the Slovak Republic No. 24/2006 Coll. on environmental impact assessment in later wordingGoogle Scholar
  4. Act of National Council of the Slovak Republic No. 391/2000 Coll. amending and supplementingGoogle Scholar
  5. AES (2011) Alternate Energy Systems, Inc., Georgia (http://altenergy.com/Technology/Tech.htm)
  6. Canter LW (1996) Environmental impact assessment. McGraw-Hill, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  7. Cepelak J (1980) Zoological regions 1:1 000 000. In: Atlas of the Slovak Socialist Republic. Slovak Academy of Science, Bratislava (in Slovak)Google Scholar
  8. Clark R (1994) Cumulative effects analysis: Final Draft. President’s Council on environmental quality, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  9. COM (2006) Green paper: a European strategy for sustainable, competitive and secure energy. Commission of the European Communities, BrusselGoogle Scholar
  10. Drdos J (2005) Environmental impact assessment. In: Drdos J, Michaeli E, Hrnciarova T (eds) Geoecology and environmentalistics: environmental planning in regional development. FHPV PU, Presov (in Slovak)Google Scholar
  11. Fasko P, Stastny P (2002) Mean annual precipitations totals. In: Bratislava ME SR (ed) Landscape atlas of the SR. Slovak Environmental Agency, Banska Bystrica (in Slovak)Google Scholar
  12. Forman RTT, Godron M (1993) Landscape ecology. Academia, Prague (in Czech)Google Scholar
  13. Futak J (1980) Phytogeographical classification; MapVII/14. In: Atlas of the Slovak Socialist Republic. Slovak Academy of Science, Bratislava (in Slovak)Google Scholar
  14. Hensel K, Krno I (2002) Zoogeographic classification: limnic biocycle. In: ME SR (eds) Slovak environmental agency: landscape atlas of the SR. Bratislava, Banska Bystrica (in Slovak)Google Scholar
  15. Iacomelli A (ed) (2005) Renewable energies for Central Asia countries: economic, environmental and social impacts. Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  16. Izakovicova Z, Moyzesova M, Bezak P, Dobrovodska M, Grotkovska L, Hrnciarova T, Kenderessy P, Krnacova Z, Majercak J, Miklosovicova Z, Moyses M, Pavlickova K, Petrovic F, Spulerova J, Stefunkova D, Valkovcova Z (2008) Agricultural landscape evaluation in transitive economics. Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Landscape Ecology, Bratislava (in Slovak)Google Scholar
  17. Kozova M, Pauditsova E (2010) Development, current state and trends of further improvement of landscape planning (comparative analysis of different approaches). In: Barancokova M, Krajci J, Kollar J (eds) Landscape ecology: methods, applications and interdisciplinary approach. Institute of Landscape Ecology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, BratislavaGoogle Scholar
  18. Low J (1984) Principles for determination and design of territorial systems of ecological stability. AgroprojektBrno (in Czech)Google Scholar
  19. Mazur E, Luknis M (1980) Geomorphological units 1:1 000 000. In: Atlas of the Slovak Socialist Republic. Slovak Academy of Science, Bratislava (in Slovak)Google Scholar
  20. Mician L, Zatkalik F (1986) Landscape theory and environment maintenance. Comenius University in Bratislava, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Bratislava (in Slovak)Google Scholar
  21. Michal I (1982) Principles of territory landscape evaluation. Architecture Urbanism 16(2):65–87 (in Czech)Google Scholar
  22. Michal I (ed) (1992) Restoration of forests ecological stability. Academia, Prague (in Czech)Google Scholar
  23. Michal I (1994) Ecological stability. Veronica, Brno (in Czech)Google Scholar
  24. Miklos L (1992) Ecologization of spatial organization, utilization and protection of landscape. Slovak Technical Library, Bratislava (in Slovak)Google Scholar
  25. Ministry of Environment of the Slovak Republic (2006) Energy policy of the Slovak Republic. Ministry of the Economy of the Slovak Republic, Bratislava (in Slovak)Google Scholar
  26. Ministry of Environment of the Slovak Republic (2007) Strategy of higher usage of renewable sources of energy. Ministry of the Economy of the Slovak Republic, Bratislava (in Slovak)Google Scholar
  27. Ministry of Environment of the Slovak Republic (2008) Energy security strategy. Bratislava: Ministry of the Economy of the Slovak Republic, Bratislava (in Slovak)Google Scholar
  28. Rehackova T, Pauditsova E (2007) Methodology of landscape ecological stability coefficient establishment. Acta Envir Univ Com (Bratislava) 15(1):26–38 (in Slovak)Google Scholar
  29. Ruzicka M, Ruzickova H, Zigrai F (1978) Landscape components, elements and structure in biological planning. Quaestiones Geobiologicae (Problems of biology of landscape) (Bratislava) 23:69–77 (in Slovak)Google Scholar
  30. Therivel R (2004) Strategic environmental assessment in action. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  31. Treweek J (1999) Ecological impact assessment. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  32. van Etteger R, Stremke S (eds) (2007) ReEnergize South Limburg: designing sustainable energy landscapes. Regional Atelier of Wageningen University and Research, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  33. Voloscuk I (2001) Theoretical and practical problems of forest ecosystems ecological stability. Scientific Studies 1/2001/A, Technical University, Zvolen. In: Drdos J (2004) Geoecology and Environmentalistics; Landscape ecology/geoecology, its environmental commitment and tasks. University of Presov, Presov(in Slovak)Google Scholar
  34. Wood C (1995) Environmental impact assessment: a comparative review. Longman Scientific & Technical, Michigan www.enviroportal.sk

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katarina Pavlickova
    • 1
    Email author
  • Anna Miklosovicova
    • 1
  • Monika Vyskupova
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Landscape Ecology, Faculty of Natural SciencesComenius University in BratislavaBratislavaThe Slovak Republic

Personalised recommendations