Advertisement

Understanding Development Trends and Landscape Changes of Protected Areas in Peninsular Malaysia: A Much Needed Component of Sustainable Conservation Planning

  • Saiful Arif AbdullahEmail author
  • Shukor Md. Nor
  • Abdul Malek Mohd Yusof
Chapter
Part of the Ecological Research Monographs book series (ECOLOGICAL)

Abstract

The establishment of protected areas in peninsular Malaysia was initiated during the British colonial period. The combination of political scenario and socioeconomic development has influenced the planning and management of protected areas in peninsular Malaysia. As a result, some of them did not receive much attention and have been exposed to various human land use activities such as agriculture, urbanization, and building highways, a concern particularly since the rapid land development for agriculture in the 1950s and the 1960s. However, from the 1980s to recent years, urbanization and other similar types of development are emerging to affect the sustainability of protected areas. Assessing landscape element change or simply landscape change of protected areas and their link to its development trends is an urgent need to identify the main priorities for protection and conservation. Therefore, this chapter presents the development trends of protected areas, followed by some analysis on landscape changes both inside and outside of protected areas in three temporal years: 1988, 1996, and 2005. The degree of their impact on ecosystem of the protected areas is also presented. The objective is to provide understanding of the linkages between the development trends and landscape changes and their impact on the ecosystems of the protected areas.

Keywords

Biodiversity Conservation planning Land use policy Sustainable development Tropical landscape Wildlife management 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study is part of a research project ScFund 04-01-02-SF0378 entitled “Landscape ecological assessment of protected areas in peninsular Malaysia for sustainable conservation planning” funded by the Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation Malaysia.

References

  1. Abdullah SA, Hezri AA (2008) From forest landscape to agricultural landscape in the developing tropical country of Malaysia: pattern, process and their significance on policy. Environ Manag 42:907–917CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abdullah SA, Yusof AMM, Nor SM (2009) Conservation status of wildlife protected areas in peninsular Malaysia: an assessment based on landscape approach. In: Ainsworth G, Garnett S (eds) RIMBA: sustainable forest livelihoods in Malaysia and Australia. LESTARI UKM, BangiGoogle Scholar
  3. Aiken SR (1991/92) The writing on the wall: declining fauna and the report of the Wild Life Commision of Malaya (1932). Wallaceana 66–67:1–6Google Scholar
  4. Aiken SR (1994) Peninsular Malaysia’s protected areas’ coverage, 1903–92: creation, rescission, excision and intrusion. Environ Conserv 21:49–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berger R (1990) Malaysia’s forest: a resource without a future. Packard, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  6. Brovko PF, Fomina NI (2008) The history of establishment of the national park network in countries of the Asian-Pacific region. Geogr Nat Resour 29:221–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Butler BJ, Swenson JJ, Alig RJ (2004) Forest fragmentation in the Pacific Northwest: quantification and correlations. For Ecol Manag 189:363–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chape S, Blyth S, Fish L, Fox P, Spalding M (compilers) (2003) 2003 United Nations List of Protected Areas. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge; UNEP-WCMC, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  9. Jomo KS, Chang YT, Khoo KJ (2004) Deforesting Malaysia: the political economy and social ecology of agriculture expansion and commercial logging. Zed Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Nur Hairunnisa R (2011) Landscape ecological assessment of Krau wildlife reserve, peninsular Malaysia for sustainable conservation planning. Master’s thesis, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, BangiGoogle Scholar
  11. Rizkalla CE, Swihart RK (2007) Explaining movement decisions of forest rodents in fragmented landscapes. Biol Conserv 140:339–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Steinhardt U, Herzog F, Lausch A, Müller E, Lehmann S (1999) Hemeroby index for landscape monitoring and evaluation. In: Pykh YA et al (eds) Environmental indices: system analysis approach. EOLSS, OxfordGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Saiful Arif Abdullah
    • 1
    Email author
  • Shukor Md. Nor
    • 2
  • Abdul Malek Mohd Yusof
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute for Environment and Development (LESTARI)Universiti Kebangsaan MalaysiaBangiMalaysia
  2. 2.School of Environment and Natural Resources, Faculty of Science and TechnologyUniversiti Kabangsaan MalaysiaBangiMalaysia
  3. 3.Department of Wildlife and National ParkKuala LumpurMalaysia

Personalised recommendations