Advertisement

Effects of Tropical Successional Forests on Bird Feeding Guilds

  • Eurídice LeyequiénEmail author
  • José Luis Hernández-Stefanoni
  • Waldemar Santamaría-Rivero
  • Juan Manuel Dupuy-Rada
  • Juan Bautista Chable-Santos
Chapter
Part of the Ecological Research Monographs book series (ECOLOGICAL)

Abstract

Previous studies have emphasized the importance of including not only the potential and costs of different land use/land cover alternatives on carbon sequestration but that also there is a need to study the impact of the resulting land cover changes on biodiversity. Tropical forests are undergoing rapid transformation as the result of human activities, which have created more than 600 million ha of secondary vegetation. In particular, tropical dry forests (TDF) are under great pressure caused by conversion to agriculture and other land uses, resulting in a heterogeneous landscape mosaic of secondary forest in different stages of succession or small forest remnants embedded in a matrix of agriculture. Changes in the landscape mosaic affect patterns of animal species abundance and distribution and, consequently, influence community composition. Despite the prevalence of successional forests, few studies have examined their influence on higher trophic levels such as bird communities. The aim of this study was to examine the relative influence of successional age, vegetation structure, and landscape structure on bird guild composition in a TDF region in the Yucatan Peninsula, an important area for migratory birds characterized by high avian endemism. Species composition of different bird feeding guilds was calculated for 274 plots of bird point counts, and vegetation structure was obtained from a vegetation survey in the same plots. We used a land cover thematic map, derived from a supervised classification of SPOT5 satellite imagery, to calculate landscape pattern metrics. Species composition of birds was related to structure of vegetation, landscape metrics of patch types, and principal coordinates of neighbor matrices (PCNM) variables using canonical correspondence analysis (CCA). Overall, bird feeding guilds were influenced by stand age, vegetation structure, and spatial structure of sampled data, and marginally by landscape composition and configuration, but varied in their response and susceptibility to habitat changes. Sound conservation and management should take into account forest specialist species, which require pristine or late secondary forests to persist, and should consider a possible decline in species that may occur in secondary forests but would otherwise use mature forests, as well as declines in species which may feed in a variety of habitats but may not necessarily reproduce in all habitat types.

Keywords

Dry tropical forest Feeding guilds Mexico Neotropical birds Secondary forests Yucatan Peninsula 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank James Callaghan and Kaxil Kiuic A.C. for logistic support. We also thank Rosalina Rodríguez Román, Filogonio May Pat, Fernando Tun Dzul, Víctor Marín Pérez, Ramiro Lara Castillo, Feliciano Pech Pinzón, Evelio Uc Uc, Mario Evelio Uc Uc, and Santos Armín Uc Uc for fieldwork and technical assistance. Funding for this research was provided by CICY, FOMIX-Yucatán (project YUC-2008-C06-108863) and CONACYT (CB-127800)

References

  1. Achard F, Eva HD, Stibig HJ, Mayaux P, Gallego J, Richards T, Malingreau JP (2002) Determination of deforestation rates of the world’s humid tropical forests. Science 297:999–1002PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arizmendi MC, Rodríguez-Flores C, Soberanes-González C (2010) White-bellied Emerald (Amazilia candida). In: Schulenberg TS (ed) Neotropical birds online. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca. http://neotropical.birds.cornell.edu/portal/species/overview?p_p_spp=252571 Accessed 5 Oct 2011
  3. Arriaga-Weiss SL, Calmé S, Kampichler C (2008) Bird communities in rainforest fragments: guild responses to habitat variables in Tabasco, Mexico. Biodivers Conserv 17:173–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bart J, Klosiewski SP (1989) Use of presence/absence to measure changes in avian density. J Wildl Manag 53:847–852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bennet PM, Owens IPF (2002) Evolutionary ecology of birds. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  6. Bhagwat SA, Willis KJ, Birks HJB, Wittaker RJ (2008) Agroforestry: a refuge for tropical biodiversity? Trends Ecol Evol 23:261–267PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bird Life International (2011) Species factsheet. http://www.birdlife.org/ Accessed 5 Oct 2011
  8. Borcard D, Legendre P (2002) All-scale spatial analysis of ecological data by means of principal coordinates of neighbour matrices. Ecol Model 153:51–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Borcard D, Legendre P, Avois-Jacquet C, Tuomisto H (2004) Dissecting spatial structure of ecological data at multiple scales. Ecology 85:1826–1832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Borcard D, Legendre P, Drapeau P (1992) Partialling out the spatial component of ecological variation. Ecology 73:1045–1055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bowman DMJS, Woinarski JCZ, Sands DPA, Wells A, McShane VJ (1990) Slash and burn agriculture in the wet coastal lowlands of Papua New Guinea: response of birds, butterflies and reptiles. J Biogeogr 17:227–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brady C, Noske R (2009) Succession in bird and plant communities over a 24-year chronosequence of mine rehabilitation in the Australian monsoon tropics. Restor Ecol 18(6):855–864Google Scholar
  13. Bribiesca-Formisano R, Rodríguez-Flores C, Soberanes-González C, Arizmendi MC, Behrstock B (2010) Thicket Tinamou (Crypturellus cinnamomeus). In: Schulenberg TS (ed) Neotropical Birds Online. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca. http://neotropical.birds.cornell.edu/portal/species/overview?p_p_spp=59956 Accessed 5 Oct 2011
  14. Brown S, Lugo AE (1990) Tropical secondary forests. J Trop Ecol 6:1–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Canaday C (1996) Loss of insectivorous birds along a gradient of human impact in Amazonia. Biol Conserv 77:63–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Colwell RK (2005) EstimateS: statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Version 7.5. User’s Guide and application. http://purl.oclc.org/estimates. Accessed 7 April 2011
  17. Dunn RR (2004) Recovery of faunal communities during tropical forest regeneration. Conserv Biol 18:302–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dunning JB (1992) CRC handbook of avian body masses. CRC, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  19. Dupuy JM, Hernández-Stefanoni JL, Hernández-Juárez RA, Tetetla-Rangel E, Lopez-Martínez JO, Leyequién-Abarca E, Tun-Dzul F, May-Pat F (2011) Patterns and correlates of tropical dry forest structure and composition in a highly replicated chronosequence in Yucatan, Mexico. Biotropica 44:151–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Flores S, Espejel I (1994) Vegetation types of the Yucatan Peninsula. Yucatan Etnoflora. UADY, México. vol 3, 135 p. (in Spanish)Google Scholar
  21. Ford HA, Barret GW, Saunders DA, Recher HF (2001) Why have birds in the woodlands of Southern Australia declined? Biol Conserv 97:71–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Furness RW, Greenwood JJD (1993) Birds as monitors of environmental change. Chapman & Hall, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gaston KJ, Blackburn TM (1995) Birds, body size and the threat of extinction. Philos Trans Biol Sci 347:205–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gotelli NJ, Entsminger GL (2001) Swap and fill algorithms in null model analysis: rethinking the knight’s tour. Oecologia 129:281–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Graham CH, Blake JG (2001) Influence of patch- and landscape-level factors on birds assemblages in a fragmented tropical landscape. Ecol Appl 116:1709–1721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gray MA, Baldauf SL, Mayhew PJ, Hill JK (2007) The response of avian feeding guilds to tropical forest disturbance. Conserv Biol 21:133–141PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Greenberg R (1990) Ecological plasticity, nephobia, and resource use in birds. Stud Avian Biol 13:431–437Google Scholar
  28. Greenberg R (1992) Forest migrants in non-forest habitats on the Yucatan Peninsula. In: Hagan JM III, Johnston DW (eds) Ecology and conservation of neotropical migrant landbirds. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, pp 273–286Google Scholar
  29. Haas CA (1995) Dispersal and use of corridors by birds in wooded patches on an agricultural landscape. Conserv Biol 9:845–854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hernández-Stefanoni JL, Dupuy JM, Tun-Dzul F, May-Pat F (2011) Effects of landscape structure and stand age on species richness and biomass of a tropical dry forest across spatial scales. Landsc Ecol 26:355–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Holmes RT, Schultz JC, Nothnagle P (1979) Bird predation on forest insects: an exclosure experiment. Science 206:462–463PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. International Tropical Timber Organization (ITTO) (2002) Guidelines for the restoration, management and rehabilitation of degraded and secondary tropical forests. ITTO Policy Development Series No 13. ITTO, Yokohama, Japan, p 84Google Scholar
  33. Johns AD (1991) Responses of Amazonian rain forest birds to habitat modification. J Trop Ecol 7:417–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Johnson MD (2000) Effects of shade-tree species and crop structure on the winter arthropod and bird communities in a Jamaican shade coffee plantation. Biotropica 32:133–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Karr JR, Freemark KE (1983) Habitat selection and environmental gradients: dynamics in the ‘stable’ tropics. Ecology 64:1481–1494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Laurence WF (2007) Have we overstated the tropical biodiversity crisis? Trends Ecol Evol 22:65–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lebrija-Trejos E, Bongers F, Pérez-Garciía EA, Meave J (2008) Successional change and resilience of a very dry tropical deciduous forest following shifting agriculture. Biotropica 40:422–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Leyequién E, de Boer WF, Cleef A (2007) Influence of body size on coexistence of bird species. Ecol Res 22:735–741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Leyequién E, de Boer WF, Toledo VM (2010) Bird community composition in a shaded coffee agro-ecological matrix in Puebla, Mexico: the effects of landscape heterogeneity at multiple spatial scales. Biotropica 42:236–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mathews S, O’Connor R, Platinga AJ (2002) Quantifying the impacts on biodiversity of policies for carbon sequestration in forests. Ecol Econ 40:71–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. May PG (1982) Secondary succession and breeding bird community structure: patterns of resource utilization. Oecologia (Berl) 55:208–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mayer AL, Cameron GN (2003) Landscape characteristics, spatial extent, and breeding bird diversity in Ohio, USA. Divers Distrib 9:297–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mazerolle MJ, Villard MA (1999) Patch characteristics and landscape context as predictor of species presence and abundance: a review. Ecoscience 6:117–124Google Scholar
  44. Mcgarigal K, Cushman SA, Neel MC (2002) FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for categorical maps. Computer software program. University of Massachusetts, AmherstGoogle Scholar
  45. Miles L, Newton AC, DeFries RS, Ravilious C, May I, Blyth S, Kapos V, Gordon JE (2006) A global overview of the conservation status of tropical dry forests. J Biogeogr 33:491–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Milesi FA, Marone L, Lopez de Casenave J, Cueto VR, Mezquida ET (2002) Guilds as indicators of environmental conditions: a case study with birds and habitat perturbations in Monte central, Argentina. Ecol Austral 12:149–161Google Scholar
  47. Miranda F, Hernández XE (1963) Los tipos de vegetación de México y su clasificación. Bol Soc Bot Méx 28:28–79Google Scholar
  48. Nichols JD, Hines JE, Sauer JR, Fallon FW, Fallon JE, Heglund PJ (2000) A double-observer approach for estimating detection probability and abundance from point counts. Auk 117:393–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pearman PB (2002) The scale of community structure: habitat variation and avian guilds in tropical forest understorey. Ecol Monogr 72:19–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Philpott SM, Arendt WJ, Armbrecht I, Bichier P, Diestch TV, Gordon C, Greenberg R, Perfecto I, Reynoso-Santos R, Soto-Pinto L, Tejeda-Cruz C, Williams-Linera G, Valenzuela J, Zolotoff JM (2008) Biodiversity loss in Latin American coffee landscapes: review of the evidence on ants, birds, and trees. Conserv Biol 22:1093–1105PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Portillo-Quintero CA, Sánchez-Azofeifa GA (2010) Extent and conservation of tropical dry forests in the Americas. Biol Conserv 143:144–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Quesada M, Sanchez-Azofeifa GA, Alvarez-Añorve M, Stoner KE, Avila-Cabadilla L, Calvo-Alvarado J, Castillo A, Espíritu-Santo MM, Fagundes M, Fernandes GW, Gamon J, Lopezaraiza-Mikel M, Lawrence D, Cerdeira-Morellato LP, Powers JS, Neves FS, Rosas-Guerrero V, Sayago R, Sanchez-Montoya G (2009) Succession and management of tropical dry forests in the Americas: review and new perspectives. For Ecol Manag 258:1014–1024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Raman TR, Sukumar R (2002) Responses of tropical rainforest birds to abandoned plantations, edges and logged forest in the Western Ghats, India. Anim Conserv 5:201–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Raman TR, Rawat GS, Johnsingh AJT (1998) Recovery of tropical rainforest avifauna in relation to vegetation succession following shifting cultivation in Mizoram, north-east India. J Appl Ecol 35:214–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rappole JH, Morton ES, Ramos MA (1992) Density, philopatry, and population estimates for songbird migrants wintering in Veracruz. In: Hagan JM, Johnston DW (eds) Ecology and conservation of Neotropical migrant landbirds. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, pp 337–344Google Scholar
  56. Renjifo LM (2001) Effect of natural and anthropogenic landscape matrices on the abundance of subandean bird species. Ecol Appl 11:14–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Robinson SK, Terborgh J (1997) Bird community dynamics along primary successional gradients of an Amazonian whitewater river. Ornithol Monogr 48:641–672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sanchez-Azofeifa GA, Quesada M, Rodriguez JP, Nassar JM, Stoner KE, Castillo A, Garvin T, Zent EL, Calvo-Alvarado JC, Kalacska MER, Fajardo L, Gamon JA, Cuevas-Reyes P (2005) Research priorities for neotropical dry forests. Biotropica 37:477–485Google Scholar
  59. Santamaría-Rivero W (2011) Efectos de la estructura del paisaje sobre la riqueza y abundancia de diferentes gremios de alimentación de aves, al sur de Yucatán, México. Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán, Mérida, Yucatán, México, p 96Google Scholar
  60. Şekercioğlu CH, Ehrlich PR, Daily GC, Aygen D, Goehring D, Sandi RF (2002) Disappearance of insectivorous birds from tropical forest fragments. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:263–267PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Şekercioğlu CH, Daily GC, Ehrlich PR (2004) Ecosystem consequences of bird declines. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:18042–18047PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Shulenberg TS (2010) Neotropical birds online. Cornell lab of ornithology, Ithaca. http://neotropical.birds.cornell.edu/portal/ Accessed 5 Oct 2011
  63. Simberloff D (1994) Habitat fragmentation and population extinction of birds. Ibis 137:S105–S111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Smith AL, Salgado-Ortiz J, Robertson RJ (2001) Distribution patterns of migrant and resident birds in successional forests of the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico. Biotropica 33:153–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Terborgh JW (1985) Habitat selection in Amazonian birds. In: Cody ML (ed) Habitat selection in birds. Academic, Orlando, pp 311–340Google Scholar
  66. Thiollay JM (1994) Structure, density and rarity in an Amazonian rain forest bird community. J Trop Ecol 10:449–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Thompson FR III, Probst JR, Raphael MG (1995) Impacts of silviculture: overview and management. In: Martin TE, Finch DM (eds) Ecology and management of Neotropical migratory birds: a synthesis and review of critical issues. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 201–219Google Scholar
  68. Volpato G, López EV, Mendoca LB, Bocon R, Bisheimer MB, Serafini PP, Anjios LD (2009) The use of the point count method for bird survey in the Atlantic forest. Zoología 26:74–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wiens JA (1989) Spatial scaling in ecology. Funct Ecol 3:385–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Willson MF (1974) Avian community organization and habitat structure. Ecology 55:1017–1029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Witt GB, Noël MV, Bird MI, Beeton RJS, Menzies NW (2011) Carbon sequestration and biodiversity restoration potential of semi-arid mulga lands of Australia interpreted from long-term grazing exclosures. Agric Ecosyst Environ 141:108–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Wright SJ (2005) Tropical forests in a changing environment. Trends Ecol Evol 20:553–560PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Wright SJ, Muller-Landau HC (2006) The future of tropical forest species. Biotropica 38:287–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eurídice Leyequién
    • 1
    Email author
  • José Luis Hernández-Stefanoni
    • 1
  • Waldemar Santamaría-Rivero
    • 1
  • Juan Manuel Dupuy-Rada
    • 1
  • Juan Bautista Chable-Santos
    • 2
  1. 1.Centro de Investigación Científica de YucatánMexicoMexico
  2. 2.Universidad Autónoma de YucatánMexicoMexico

Personalised recommendations