Skip to main content

New Mechanism for Matching Service in Perishable Goods Trade: An Approach Using Economic Experiments

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Serviceology for Services (ICServ 2013)

Included in the following conference series:

  • 809 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter evaluates a new mechanism for matching service in perishable goods by using the experimental economics method. This new mechanism employs a double-sided auction mechanism, in which buyers and sellers bid on both prices and date to trade. When compared to another type of double-sided auction mechanism, called the time criticality-based mechanism, this new mechanism achieves more truthful bidding of a date to trade and trading prices that are closer to the market equilibrium prices. However, the new mechanism is less efficient economically because there are fewer transactions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Metropolitan Central Wholesale Market in Tokyo. http://www.shijou.metro.tokyo.jp/english/marketguide.html

  2. Miyashita K (2011) A realization of B2B seafood trading based on call-market systems, 2011. In: Autumn meeting of the food system research association of Japan, Kyoto University

    Google Scholar 

  3. Green EJ, Zhou RL (2002) Dynamic monetary equilibrium in a random matching economy. Econometrica 70:929–969

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Menkhaus DJ et al (2009) Inventories and public information in private negotiation: a laboratory market study. Am J Agric Econ 91:503–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Moulet S, Rouchier J (2008) The influence of seller learning and time constraints on sequential bargaining in an artificial perishable goods market. J Econ Dyn Control 32:2322–2348

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Rouchier J (2013) The interest of having loyal buyers in a perishable market. Comput Econ 41:151–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Brandts J, Guillen P (2007) Collusion and fights in an experiment with price-setting firms and advance production. J Ind Econ 55:453–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nagel R, Vriend NJ (1999) An experimental study of adaptive behavior in an oligopolistic market game. J Evol Econ 9:27–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang T, Brorsen BW (2011) Oligopoly firms with quantity-price strategic decisions. J Econ Interact Coord 6:157–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Monier-Dilhan S, Ossard H (1998) Producers’ loss due to asymmetric information: an application to a specific case. Eur Rev Agric Econ 25:155–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Said M (2012) Auctions with dynamic populations: efficiency and revenue maximization. J Econ Theory 147:2419–2438

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Sano R (2013) A dynamic mechanism design for scheduling with different lengths of use, Working paper

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wang S, Wang H (2011) A virtual competition auction model for perishable products. Electron Mark 21:53–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cason T, Plott C (1996) EPA’s new emissions trading mechanism: a laboratory evaluation. J Environ Econ Manag 30:133–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Asama H (2009) Service engineering. J Jpn Soc Precis Eng 75:146–147 (in Japanese)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Smith V (1976) Experimental economics: induced value theory. Am Econ Rev 66:274–279

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fischbacher U (2007) z-tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Exp Econ 10:171–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenju Akai .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Japan

About this paper

Cite this paper

Akai, K., Hayashida, K., Nishino, N. (2014). New Mechanism for Matching Service in Perishable Goods Trade: An Approach Using Economic Experiments. In: Mochimaru, M., Ueda, K., Takenaka, T. (eds) Serviceology for Services. ICServ 2013. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54816-4_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54816-4_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo

  • Print ISBN: 978-4-431-54815-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-4-431-54816-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics