Skip to main content

New Mechanism for Matching Service in Perishable Goods Trade: An Approach Using Economic Experiments

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Serviceology for Services (ICServ 2013)

Abstract

This chapter evaluates a new mechanism for matching service in perishable goods by using the experimental economics method. This new mechanism employs a double-sided auction mechanism, in which buyers and sellers bid on both prices and date to trade. When compared to another type of double-sided auction mechanism, called the time criticality-based mechanism, this new mechanism achieves more truthful bidding of a date to trade and trading prices that are closer to the market equilibrium prices. However, the new mechanism is less efficient economically because there are fewer transactions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Metropolitan Central Wholesale Market in Tokyo. http://www.shijou.metro.tokyo.jp/english/marketguide.html

  2. Miyashita K (2011) A realization of B2B seafood trading based on call-market systems, 2011. In: Autumn meeting of the food system research association of Japan, Kyoto University

    Google Scholar 

  3. Green EJ, Zhou RL (2002) Dynamic monetary equilibrium in a random matching economy. Econometrica 70:929–969

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Menkhaus DJ et al (2009) Inventories and public information in private negotiation: a laboratory market study. Am J Agric Econ 91:503–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Moulet S, Rouchier J (2008) The influence of seller learning and time constraints on sequential bargaining in an artificial perishable goods market. J Econ Dyn Control 32:2322–2348

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Rouchier J (2013) The interest of having loyal buyers in a perishable market. Comput Econ 41:151–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Brandts J, Guillen P (2007) Collusion and fights in an experiment with price-setting firms and advance production. J Ind Econ 55:453–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nagel R, Vriend NJ (1999) An experimental study of adaptive behavior in an oligopolistic market game. J Evol Econ 9:27–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang T, Brorsen BW (2011) Oligopoly firms with quantity-price strategic decisions. J Econ Interact Coord 6:157–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Monier-Dilhan S, Ossard H (1998) Producers’ loss due to asymmetric information: an application to a specific case. Eur Rev Agric Econ 25:155–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Said M (2012) Auctions with dynamic populations: efficiency and revenue maximization. J Econ Theory 147:2419–2438

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Sano R (2013) A dynamic mechanism design for scheduling with different lengths of use, Working paper

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wang S, Wang H (2011) A virtual competition auction model for perishable products. Electron Mark 21:53–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cason T, Plott C (1996) EPA’s new emissions trading mechanism: a laboratory evaluation. J Environ Econ Manag 30:133–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Asama H (2009) Service engineering. J Jpn Soc Precis Eng 75:146–147 (in Japanese)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Smith V (1976) Experimental economics: induced value theory. Am Econ Rev 66:274–279

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fischbacher U (2007) z-tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Exp Econ 10:171–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenju Akai .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Japan

About this paper

Cite this paper

Akai, K., Hayashida, K., Nishino, N. (2014). New Mechanism for Matching Service in Perishable Goods Trade: An Approach Using Economic Experiments. In: Mochimaru, M., Ueda, K., Takenaka, T. (eds) Serviceology for Services. ICServ 2013. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54816-4_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54816-4_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo

  • Print ISBN: 978-4-431-54815-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-4-431-54816-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics