Abstract
Abstract
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Barabási AL, Albert R. Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Rev Mod Phys. 2002;74:47–97.
Barabási AL, et al. Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations. Phys A. 2002;311:590–614.
Boguñá M, et al. Models of social networks based on social distance attachment. Phys Rev E. 2004;70(5):1–8. l
Chessa A, et al. Is Europle evolving toward an integrated research area? Science. 2013;339(6120):650–1.
Girvan M, Newman MEJ. Community structure in social and biological networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99(12):7821–26.
Goldstein M, Morris S, Yen G. Group-based Yule model for bipartite author-paper networks. Phys Rev E. 2005;71(2):1–6.
Grönlund A, Holme P. Networking the seceder model: group formation in social and economic systems. Phys Rev E. 2004;70(3):1–9.
Guimera R, et al. Team assembly mechanisms determine collaboration network structure and team performance. Science. 2005;308(5722):697–702.
Hagedoorn J, Kranenburg HV, Osborn RN. Joint patenting amongst companies – exploring the effects of inter-firm R&D partnering and experience. Manag Decis Econ. 2003;24:71–84.
Hall BH, Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M. The NBER patent citations data file: lessons, insights and methodological tools. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 8498; 2001.
Inoue H. A two-layer team-assembly model for invention networks. Phys A Stat Mech Appl. 2014;415:181–8.
Jin EM, Girvan M, Newman ME. Structure of growing social networks. Phys Rev E. 2001;64(4):046132.
Jones BJ, Wuchty S, Uzzi B. Multi-university research teams: shifting impact, geography, and stratification in science. Science. 2008;322(5905):1259–62.
Kimura M, Saito K, Ueda N. Modeling of growing networks with directional attachment and communities. Neural Netw. 2004;17(7):975–88.
Kirkpatrick S, Gelatt Jr CC, Vecchi MP. Optimization by simulated annealing. Science. 1983;220(4598):671–80.
Li C, Maini PK. An evolving network model with community structure. J Phys A Math Gen. 2005;38(45):9741–9.
Motter A, Nishikawa T, Lai Y-C. Large-scale structural organization of social networks. Phys Rev E. 2003;68(3):1–5.
Newman MEJ. The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:404–9.
Newman MEJ. Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:5200–5.
Newman MEJ, Girvan M. Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Phys Rev E. 2004;69(2):1–5.
Radicchi F, et al. Defining and identifying communities in networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101(9):2658–63.
Ramasco J, Dorogovtsev S, Pastor-Satorras R. Self-organization of collaboration networks. Phys Rev E. 2004;70(30):1–10.
Tamada S, Kodama F, Gemba K. A study on science linkage of Japanese patents; an analysis on patents in the field of genetic technology by constructing a citation database. J Sci Policy Res Manag. 2002;17(3/4):222–30.
Trajtenberg M, Shiff G, Melamed R. The “NAMES GAME”: harnessing inventors’ patent data for economic research. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 12479; 2006.
Wuchty S, Jones BF, Uzzi B. The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science. 2007;316(5827):1036–9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Inoue, H. (2020). Generative Model: Intertexture of Firm and Inventor. In: Co-patenting: An Analytic Tool for Cooperative Research and Development. Evolutionary Economics and Social Complexity Science, vol 21. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54807-2_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54807-2_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo
Print ISBN: 978-4-431-54806-5
Online ISBN: 978-4-431-54807-2
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)