Community of Establishment Networks

Part of the Evolutionary Economics and Social Complexity Science book series (EESCS, volume 21)




  1. 1.
    Barabási A-L. Network science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2016.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Benner M, Waldfogel. J. Close to you? Bias and precision in patent-based measures of technological proximity. Res Policy. 2008;37(9):1556–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Berliant M, Fujita M. Knowledge creation as a square dance on the Hilbert cube. Int Econ Rev. 2008;49(4):1251–95.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bloom NN, Schankerman M, Van Reenen J. Identifying technology spillovers and product market rivalry. Econometrica. 2013;81(4):1347–93.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fleming L, King III C, Juda AI. Small worlds and regional innovation. Organ Sci. 2007;18(6):938–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fleming L, Mingo S, Chen D. Collaborative brokerage, generative creativity, and creative success. Admin Sci Q. 2007;52(3):443–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Forti E, Franzoni C, Sobrero M. Bridges or isolates? Investigating the social networks of academic inventors. Res Policy. 2013;42(8):1378–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fortunato S, Barthelemy M. Resolution limit in community detection. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2007;104(1):36–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gautam A. Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: a longitudinal study. Admin Sci Q. 2000;45(3):425–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gonzalez-Brambila CN, Veloso FM, Krackhardt D. The impact of network embeddedness on research output. Res Pol. 2013;42(9):1555–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Goto A, Motohashi K. Construction of a Japanese patent database and a first look at Japanese patenting activities. Res Policy. 2007;36(9):1431–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Griliches Z. R&D and productivity-the economic evidence. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Inoue H. The community structure of business establishments and its properties: evidence from joint patent applications. Evol Inst Econ Rev. 2018;15(2):465–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Inoue H, Nakajima K, Saito Y. Localization of collaborations in knowledge creation. Ann Reg Sci. 2019;62(1):119–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kawamoto T, Rosvall M. Estimating the resolution limit of the map equation in community detection. Phys Rev E. 2015;91(1):012809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lancichinetti A, Fortunato S. Community detection algorithms: a comparative analysis. Phys Rev E. 2009;80(5):056117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nagaoka S, Motohashi K, Goto A. Patent statistics as an innovation indicator. In: Hall BH, editor. Handbook of the economics of innovation, vol. 2. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2010. p. 1083–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rosvall M, Bergstrom CT. Maps of random walks on complex networks reveal community structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2008;105(4):1118–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rosvall M, Bergstrom CT. Multilevel compression of random walks on networks reveals hierarchical organization in large integrated systems. PloS One. 2011;6(4):e18209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Trajtenberg M. A penny for your quotes: patent citations and the value of innovations. Rand J Econ. 21(1);1990:172–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of Simulation StudiesUniversity of HyogoKobeJapan

Personalised recommendations