Agglomeration of Establishment Co-patenting

Part of the Evolutionary Economics and Social Complexity Science book series (EESCS, volume 21)




  1. 1.
    Agarwal S, Hauswald R. Distance and private information in lending. Rev Financ Stud. 2010;23(7):2757–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arbia G, Espa G, Quah D. A class of spatial econometric methods in the empirical analysis of clusters of firms in the space. Empir Econ. 2008;34(1):81–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cairncross F. The death of distance: how the communications revolution is changing our lives. Boston: Harvard Business School Press; 2001. ISBN: 9781578514380.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Carlino GA, et al. The agglomeration of R&D labs. Working Paper Series 12–22. Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia; 2012.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Duranton G, Overman HG. Testing for localization using micro-geographic data. Rev Econ Stud. 2005;72(4):1077–106.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Goto A, Motohashi K. Construction of a Japanese patent database and a first look at Japanese patenting activities. Res Policy. 2007;36(9):1431–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Griffith R, Lee S, Van Reenen J. Is distance dying at last? Falling home bias in fixed-effects models of patent citations. Quant Econ. 2011;2(2):211–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hausler J, Hohn H-W, Lutz S, et al. Contingencies of innovative networks: a case study of successful interfirm R&D collaboration. Res Policy. 1994;23(1):47–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Inoue H, Nakajima K, Saito Y. Localization of knowledge-creating establishments. Jpn World Econ. 2017;43:23–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Inoue H, Nakajima K, Saito Y. Localization of collaborations in knowledge creation. Ann Reg Sci. 2019;62(1):119–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M, Henderson R. Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Q J Econ. 1993;108:577–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Keller W, Yeaple SR. The gravity of knowledge. Am Econ Rev. 2013;103(4):1414–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kerr WR, Kominers SD. Agglomerative forces and cluster shapes. Rev Econ Stat. 2015;97(4):877–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lerner J. Venture capitalists and the oversight of private firms. J Financ. 1995;50(1):301–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Murata Y, et al. Localized knowledge spillovers and patent citations: a distance-based approach. Rev Econ Stat. 2014;96(5):967–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    OECD. Compendium of patent statistics. Technical report. Paris: OECD; 2008.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pittaway L, et al. Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence. Int J Manag Rev. 2004;5(3–4):137–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Saito YU, Yamauchi I. Inventors’ mobility and organizations’ productivity: evidence from Japanese rare name inventors. RIETI Discussion Paper Series, 15-E-128; 2015.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Suzuki J. The structural characteristics of research and development by Japanese companies, and issues for the future. RIETI Discussion Paper Series, 11-J-002; 2011.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Thompson P, Fox-Kean M. Patent citations and the geography of knowledge spillovers: a reassessment. Am Econ Rev. 2005;95(1):450–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of Simulation StudiesUniversity of HyogoKobeJapan

Personalised recommendations