Advertisement

The Effect of Continuous Disclosure of Environmental Report

  • Yuki TanakaEmail author
Chapter
  • 1.1k Downloads
Part of the Advances in Japanese Business and Economics book series (AJBE, volume 6)

Abstract

This paper investigates the economic consequences of corporate environmental disclosure in the Japanese context. Our focus is continuity of environmental reporting. We investigate the relationship between continuous voluntary environmental disclosure and a firm’s cost of capital. Our sample is consisted of non-financial companies listed on the Tokyo Stock Exchange for the period 2003–2009. As a result, we show a negative relation between the issuance of a voluntary environmental report and firm’s cost of capital. Therefore, long-term issuance of environmental disclosure is associated with a lower cost of capital. Overall, our results are consistent with some of prior evidences that capital market participants appear to value the existence and availability of voluntary corporate environmental information and add new evidences to environmental disclosure literature.

Keywords

Cost of capital Environmental disclosure Multiple estimation 

References

  1. Anderson, J. C., & Frankle, A. W. (1980). Voluntary social reporting: An iso-beta portfolio analysis. The Accounting Review, 55(3), 467–479.Google Scholar
  2. Barth, M. E., & McNichols, M. F. (1994). Estimation and market valuation of environmental liabilities relating to superfund sites. Journal of Accounting Research, 32(3), 177–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chan, C. C. C., & Milne, M. J. (1999). Investor reactions to corporate environmental saints and sinners: An experimental analysis. Accounting and Business Research, 29(4), 265–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clarkson, P., Fang, X., Li, Y., & Richardson, G. D. (2010). The relevance of environmental disclosures for investors and other stakeholder groups: Are such disclosures incrementally informative? Working Paper, Rotman School of Management, Toronto. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1687475. Accessed 31 Aug 2013.
  5. Clarkson, P., Li, Y., & Richardson, G. D. (2004). The market valuation of environmental capital expenditures by pulp and paper companies. The Accounting Review, 79(2), 329–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Core, J. E. (2001). A review of the disclosure literature. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 31(1–3), 441–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dhaliwal, D. S., Radhakrishnan, S., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2012). Nonfinancial disclosure and analyst forecast accuracy: International evidence on corporate social responsibility disclosure. The Accounting Review, 87(3), 723–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dhaliwal, D. S., Zhen, L. O., Tsang, A., & Yong, G. Y. (2011). Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of capital: The initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting. The Accounting Review, 86(1), 59–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Diamond, D. W., & Verrecchia, R. E. (1991). Disclosure, liquidity and the cost of capital. Journal of Finance, 46(4), 1325–1359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fama, E., & French, K. R. (1993). Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 33(1), 3–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fama, E., & French, K. R. (1997). Industry costs of equity. Journal of Financial Economics, 43(2), 153–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Freedman, M., & Jaggi, B. (1986). An analysis of the impact of corporate pollution disclosures included in annual financial statements on investors’ decisions. Advances in Public Interest Accounting, 1, 193–212.Google Scholar
  13. Gebhardt, W. R., Lee, C. M. C., & Swaminathan, B. (2001). Toward and implied cost of capital. Journal of Accounting Research, 39(1), 135–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Guidry, R. P., & Patten, D. M. (2010). Market reactions to the first-time issuance of corporate sustainability reports: Evidence that quality matters. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 1(1), 33–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Healy, P. M., & Palepu, K. G. (2001). Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31(1–3), 405–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hughes, K. E., II. (2000). The value relevance of nonfinancial measures of air pollution in the electric utility industry. The Accounting Review, 75(2), 209–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hughes, J. S., Liu, J., & Liu, J. (2007). Information asymmetry, diversification and cost of capital. The Accounting Review, 82(3), 705–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ingram, R. W. (1978). An investigation of the information content of (certain) social responsibility disclosures. Journal of Accounting Research, 16(2), 270–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jones, S., Frost, G., Loftus, J., & Laan, S. V. D. (2007). An empirical investigation of the market returns and financial performance of entities engaged in sustainability reporting. Australian Accounting Review, 17(1), 78–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. KPMG. (2008). International Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting, KPMG. http://www.kpmg.com/lu/en/issuesandinsights/articlespublications/pages/kpmginternationalsurveyoncorporateresponsibilityreporting2008.aspx. Accessed 31 Aug 2013.
  21. KPMG. (2011). International Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting, KPMG. http://www.kpmg.com/global/en/issuesandinsights/articlespublications/corporate-responsibility/pages/2011-survey.aspx. Accessed 31 Aug 2013.
  22. Lambert, R., Leuz, C., & Verrecchia, R. F. (2007). Accounting information, disclosure and the cost of capital. Journal of Accounting Research, 45, 385–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Leuz, C., & Schrand, C. M. (2011). Disclosure and the cost of capital: Evidence from firms’ response to the enron shock. Working Paper, University of Chicago Booth School of Business, Chicago, Research Paper No. 08–26. http://papers.ssrn.com/, abstract_id = 1319646. Accessed 31 Aug 2013.
  24. Leuz, C., & Verrecchia, R. E. (2000). The economic consequences of increased disclosure. Journal of Accounting Research, 38(Supplement 2000), 91–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Leuz, C., & Wysocki, P. D. (2008). Economic consequences of financial reporting and disclosure regulation: A review and suggestions for future research. Working Paper. http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract_id=1105398. Accessed 31 Aug 2013.
  26. Merton, R. C. (1987). A simple model of capital market equilibrium with incomplete information. Journal of Finance, 42(3), 483–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Murray, A., Sinclair, D., Power, D., & Gray, R. (2006). Do financial markets care about social and environmental disclosure? Further evidence and exploration from the UK. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 19(2), 228–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ohlson, J. A. (1995). Earnings, book values, and dividends in equity valuation. Contemporary Accounting Research, 11, 2.Google Scholar
  29. Plumlee, M., Brown, D., & Marshall, S. (2010). Voluntary environmental disclosure quality and firm value: Further evidence. Working Paper, University of Utah, Salt Lake City. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1517153. Accessed 31 Aug 2013.
  30. Richardson, A. J., & Welker, M. (2001). Social disclosure, financial disclosure and the cost of capital. Accounting Organizations and Society, 26(7), 597–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Simnett, R., Vanstraelen, A., & Chua, W. F. (2009). Assurance on sustainability reports: An international comparison. The Accounting Review, 84(3), 937–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EconomicsHosei UniversityMachidaJapan

Personalised recommendations