Advertisement

Framework and Overview

  • Kunio ItoEmail author
Chapter
  • 1.1k Downloads
Part of the Advances in Japanese Business and Economics book series (AJBE, volume 6)

Abstract

This chapter explains the background, motive, and analytical framework as well as the underlying notion adopted in this book. Convergence to International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) is one of the most controversial issues and is the subject of increasing interest in both accounting research and practice. Despite the push toward convergence, accounting systems in individual countries remain deeply intertwined with their unique institutions, such as corporate and economic systems and legal practice, i.e., “enforcement.” As a result, for each country, an individual mix of global and local factors determines the economic consequences or relevance of accounting standards convergence. Based on the evidence of economic consequences this book intends to provide empirical implications for a global accounting standards setting. A further dimension is explored in the volume. Despite the globalization of accounting standards, each country continues to have its own corporate disclosure systems or regulations, regardless of whether they are mandatory or voluntary, because securities administration systems and corporate governance standards lack convergence or a common model like IFRS. We make attempts to identify the inherent characteristics of disclosure behavior by Japanese firms and empirically diagnose its effects on corporate behavior and capital market in terms of enforcement unique to Japan.

Keywords

Accounting standards Convergence Corporate system Earnings attributes Enforcement IFRS Management forecast Risk disclosure 

References

  1. Ahmed, A. S., Neel, M., & Wang, D. (2013). Does mandatory adoption of IFRS improve accounting quality? Preliminary evidence. Contemporary Accounting Research, 30(4), 1344–1372.Google Scholar
  2. Barth, M. E., Landsman, W. R., & Lang, M. H. (2008). International accounting standards and accounting quality. Journal of Accounting Research, 46(3), 467–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beneish, M. D., Miller, B. P., & Yohn, T. L. (2012). The impact of financial reporting on equity versus debt markets: Macroeconomic evidence from mandatory IFRS adoption. Working Paper. Bloomington: Indiana University.Google Scholar
  4. Brüggemann, U., Hitz, J. M., & Sellhorn, T. (2013). Intended and unintended consequences of mandatory IFRS adoption: Extant evidence and suggestions for future research. European Accounting Review, 22(1), 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Christensen, H. B., Hail, L., & Leuz, C. (2013). Mandatory IFRS reporting and changes in enforcement. Working Paper. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  6. Chua, Y. L., Cheong, C. S., & Gould, G. (2012). The impact of mandatory IFRS adoption on accounting quality: A review of evidence from Australia. Journal of International Accounting Research, 11(1), 119–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Daske, H., Hail, L., Leuz, C., & Verdi, R. (2008). Mandatory IFRS reporting around the world: Early evidence on the economic consequences. Journal of Accounting Research, 46(5), 1085–1142.Google Scholar
  8. Easley, D., & O’Hara, M. (2004). Information and the cost of capital. The Journal of Finance, 59(4), 1553–1583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Florou, A., & Kosi, U. (2013). Does mandatory IFRS adoption facilitate debt financing? Working Paper. London: University of London.Google Scholar
  10. Hail, L., & Leuz, C. (2006). International differences in the cost of equity capital: Do legal institutions and securities regulation matter? Journal of Accounting Research, 44(3), 485–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hail, L., Leuz, C., & Wysocki, P. (2010). Global accounting convergence and the potential adoption of IFRS by the U.S. (Part I): Conceptual underpinnings and economic analysis. Accounting Horizons, 24(3), 355–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Itami, H. (2010). Organization accumulates and market utilizes: A framework of knowledge-corporate system-innovation dynamics. In H. Itami, K. Kusunoki, T. Numagami, & A. Takeishi (Eds.), Dynamics of knowledge, corporate systems and innovation. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Iwai, K. (2009). Kaisha wa korekara dou naru noka (Where are corporations going?). Tokyo: Heibonsha Ltd.Google Scholar
  14. Iwai, K., & Sato, T. (2011). IFRS ni igiari – kokusai kaikei kijun no hinshitsu wo tou (Objections to IFRS: Questioning the quality of IFRS). Tokyo: Nikkei Publishing.Google Scholar
  15. Jackson, H. E., & Roe, M. J. (2009). Public and private enforcement of secuirities laws: Resource-based evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 93(2), 207–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Khurana, I. K., & Michas, P. N. (2011). Mandatory IFRS adoption and the U.S. home bias. Accounting Horizons, 25(4), 729–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kvaal, E., & Nobes, C. (2010). International differences in IFRS policy choice: A research note. Accounting and Business Research, 40(2), 173–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Landsman, W. R., Maydew, E. L., & Thornock, J. R. (2012). The information content of annual earnings announcements and mandatory adoption of IFRS. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 53(1–2), 34–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Leuz, C. (2010). Different approaches to corporate reporting regulation: How jurisdictions differ and why. Accounting and Business Research, 40(3), 229–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Leuz, C., Nanda, D., & Wysocki, P. D. (2003). Earnings management and investor protection: An international comparison. Journal of Financial Economics, 69(3), 505–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Li, S. (2010). Does mandatory adoption of international financial reporting standards in the European Union reduce the cost of equity capital? The Accounting Review, 85(2), 607–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Liao, Q., Sellhorn, T., & Skaife, H. A. (2012). The cross-country comparability of IFRS earnings and book values: Evidence from France and Germany. Journal of International Accounting Research, 11(1), 155–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Muller, K. A., Riedl, E. J., & Sellhor, T. (2011). Mandatory fair value accounting and information asymmetry: Evidence from the European real estate industry. Management Science, 57(6), 1138–1153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Saito, S. (2013). Kaikei kijyun no kenkyu (Research in accounting standards) (rev. ed.). Tokyo: Chuo keizaisha.Google Scholar
  25. Shima, K. M., & Gordon, E. A. (2011). IFRS and the regulatory environment: The case of U.S. investor allocation choice. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 30(5), 481–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tan, H., Wang, S., & Welker, M. (2011). Analyst following and forecast accuracy after mandated IFRS adoptions. Journal of Accounting Research, 49(5), 1307–1357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Verriest, A., Gaeremynck, A., & Thornton, D. B. (2013). The impact of corporate governance on IFRS adoption choices. European Accounting Review, 22(1), 39–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wysocki, P. (2011). New institutional accounting and IFRS. Accounting and Business Research, 41(3), 309–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Yip, R. W. Y., & Young, D. (2012). Does mandatory IFRS adoption improve information comparability? The Accounting Review, 87(5), 1767–1789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of Commerce and ManagementHitotsubashi UniversityKunitachiJapan

Personalised recommendations