Abstract
No one denies that the brain is the main organ for cognition. However, the brain has evolved with the body. We cannot really understand how the brain works unless we understand the function of the body. In this chapter, we review several experimental examples of robots that have similar structures to humans and investigate the function of the body. It turns out that in order for a robot to achieve intelligent behavior, it is extremely important to have a compliant body with a muscular–skeletal structure.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Braun, D.J., et al.: Robots driven by compliant actuators: optimal control under actuation constraints. IEEE Trans. Robot. 29(5), 1085–1101 (2013)
Chou, C.P., Hannaford, B.: Measurement and modeling of McKibben pneumatic artificial muscles. IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 12(1), 90–102 (1996)
Coleman, M.J., Chatterjee, A., Ruina, A.: Motions of a rimless spoked wheel: a simple 3d system with impacts. Dynam. Stabil. Syst. 12(3), 139–160 (1997)
Hosoda, K., et al.: Pneumatic-driven jumping robot with anthropomorphic muscular skeleton structure. Auton. Robots 28(3), 307–316 (2010)
Hosoda, K., et al.: Anthropomorphic muscular-skeletal robotic upper limb for understanding embodied intelligence. Adv. Robot. 26(7), 729–744 (2012)
Jacobs, R., Bobbert, M.F., van Ingen Schenau, G.J.: Mechanical output from individual muscles during explosive leg extensions: the role of biarticular muscles. J. Biomech. 29(4), 513–523 (1996)
McGeer, T.: Passive dynamic walking. Int. J. Robot. Res. 9(2), 62–82 (1990)
Pfeifer, R., Bongard, J.: How the Body Shapes the Way We Think, Chapter 3. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (2007)
Takuma, T., Hosoda, K.: Terrain negotiation of a compliant biped robot driven by antagonistic artificial muscles. J. Robot. Mechatron. 19(4), 423–428 (2007a)
Takuma, T., Hosoda, K.: Controlling walking behavior of passive dynamic walker utilizing passive joint compliance. In: Proceedings of 2007 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 2975–2980 (2007b)
Wisse, M., van Frankenhuyzen, J.: Design and control of ‘Mike’; A 2D autonomous biped based on passive dynamic walking. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Adaptive Motion of Animals and Machines (AMAM) (2003)
Yoshikawa, T.: Foundations of Robotics. The MIT Press, Boston (1990)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Exercises
Exercises
Think about the following problems:
-
1.
Find and discuss on a study demonstrating that an animal or insect exploits its dynamics for intelligent behavior. The reader might find some studies easily, but there are examples of dogs, cats, birds, bees, flies, and, of course, humans.
-
2.
Find our daily tools/devices that are designed for our comfortable use, and exploit our body dynamics, and discuss how their designs work.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Japan
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hosoda, K. (2016). Compliant Body as a Source of Intelligence. In: Kasaki, M., Ishiguro, H., Asada, M., Osaka, M., Fujikado, T. (eds) Cognitive Neuroscience Robotics A. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54595-8_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54595-8_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo
Print ISBN: 978-4-431-54594-1
Online ISBN: 978-4-431-54595-8
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)