Decision-Making Process

  • Kazuhisa Takemura


This chapter presents a description of a decision-making process. The previous chapters have explained the decision-making phenomenon and theories to describe the phenomenon, which, however, have largely omitted a description of the process through which a decision is made. Accordingly, this chapter presents a description of how the psychological process used in decision making is explainable using a technique to follow the decision-making process. This chapter also elucidates the task variables and emotional factors affecting the decision-making process. The final section explains the changes made to cognition in psychological processes after decision making.


Positive Emotion Test Subject Decision Strategy Information Search Information Processing Capacity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Abelson, R. P., & Levi, A. (1985). Decision making and decision theory. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 231–309). New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  2. Akiyama, M., & Takemura, K. (1994). Hukai kanjo to kanyo ga ishikettei katei ni oyobosu eikyo [Effect of negative affect and involvement on the decision making process]. Japanese Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 58–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beach, L. R., & Mitchell, T. R. (1978). A contingency model for the selection of decision strategies. Academy of Management Review, 3, 439–449.Google Scholar
  4. Bettman, J. (1979). An information processing theory of consumer choice. Reading: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
  5. Bettman, J., Johnson, E. J., & Payne, J. W. (1991). Consumer decision making. In T. S. Robertson & H. H. Kassarjian (Eds.), Handbook of consumer behavior (pp. 50–79). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  6. Biehal, G. J. (1983). Consumers' prior experiences and perceptions in auto repair choice. Journal of Marketing, 47, 82–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cohen, J. B., & Areni, C. S. (1991). Affect and consumer behavior. In T. S. Robertson & H. H. Kassarjian (Eds.), Handbook of consumer behavior (pp. 188–240). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  8. Engel, J. F., Blackwell, R. D., & Miniard, P. W. (1993). Consumer behavior (7th ed.). New York: Dryden.Google Scholar
  9. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press. [Suenaga, T. (Trans. supervisor) (1965). Ninchiteki Fukyowa No Riron: Shakai Shinrigaku Josetsu. Seishin Shobo].Google Scholar
  10. Festinger, L., & Carlsmith, J. M. (1959). Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58, 203–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Forgas, J. P. (1991). Affective influence on partner choice: Role of mood in social decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 708–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gigerenzer, G., & Selten, R. (Eds.). (2001). Bounded rationality: The adaptive toolbox. Cambridge: MIT.Google Scholar
  13. Harn-Jones, E., & Mills, J. (Eds.). (1999). Cognitive dissonance: Progress on a pivotal theory in social psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  14. Isen, A. M., & Means, B. (1983). The influence of positive affect on decision making strategy. Social Cognition, 2, 18–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Klayman, J. (1983). Analysis of predecisional information search patterns. In P. Humphreys, O. Svenson, & A. Vari (Eds.), Analyzing and aiding decision processes (pp. 401–414). Amsterdam: North-Holland.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Knox, R. E., & Inkster, J. A. (1968). Postdecision dissonance at post time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8, 319–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lewinsohn, S., & Mano, H. (1993). Multi-attribute choice and affect: The influence of naturally occurring and manipulated moods on choice processes. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 6, 33–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Luce, M. F., Bettman, J. R., & Payne, J. W. (2001). Emotional decisions: Tradeoff difficulty and coping in consumer choice: Monographs of journal of consumer research 1. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  19. Matz, D., & Wood, W. (2005). Cognitive dissonance in groups: The consequences of disagreement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 22–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Montgomery, H. (1983). Decision rules and the search for a dominance structure: Towards a process model of decision making. In P. C. Humphreys, O. Svenson, & A. Vari (Eds.), Analyzing and aiding decision processes (pp. 343–369). Amsterdam: North-Holland.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Montgomery, H. (1993). The search for a dominance structure in decision making: Examining the evidence. In G. A. Klein, J. Orasanu, R. Calderwood, & C. E. Zsambok (Eds.), Decision making in action: Models and methods (pp. 182–187). Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar
  22. Mowen, J. C. (1995). Consumer behavior (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  23. Okubo, S., Morogami, S., Takemura, K., & Fujii, S. (2006). Kanjo Ga Joho Kensaku Ni Ataeru Eikyo No Jikken Kenkyu: Aikamera Ni Yoru Katei Tsuiseki Wo Mochiite [An experimental study of the effects of emotions on information search: Using eye camera-based process tracking]. Collection of Lecture Papers for 2004 Entaateimento Kansei Waakushoppu [Entertainment Sensitivity Workshop] (pp. 14–19).Google Scholar
  24. Payne, J. W. (1976). Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: An information search and protocol analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 366–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Payne, J. W., & Bettman, J. R. (2004). Walking with the scarecrow: The information-processing approach to decision research. In D. J. Koehler & N. Harvey (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision (pp. 110–132). Malden: Blackwell Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Simon, H. A. (1957). Administrative behavior: A study of decision making process in administrative organization, New York, NY: McMillan.Google Scholar
  27. Svenson, O. (2006). Pre-and postdecision construction of preferences: Differentiation and consolidation. In S. Lichtenstein & P. Slovie (Eds.), The construction of preference (pp. 356–371). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Takemura, K. (1985). Ishikettei sutorateji jikko ni okeru meta ninchi katei moderu [A meta-cognitive model for the implementation of decision strategies]. Doshisha shinri [Doshisha Psychological Review], 32, 16–22.Google Scholar
  29. Takemura, K. (1987). Ishikettei Katei No Kenkyu (X): Kanjo To IshiKettei Katei No Kanrensei [Study of decision-making process (X): relationship between emotions and decision-making process]. Collection of Papers Presented at the Fourth Annual Meeting of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society (pp. 56–57).Google Scholar
  30. Takemura, K. (1988). Ishikettei Katei No Kenkyu (XII): Kanjo Oyobi Kanyo Ga IshiKettei Katei Ni Okeru Joho Kensaku Kodo Ni Oyobosu Koka [Study of decision-making process (XII): The effects of emotions and involvement on the information search behavior in decision-making process]. Collection of Papers Presented at the 36th Annual Meeting of the Japanese Group Dynamics Association (pp. 23–24).Google Scholar
  31. Takemura, K. (1993). Protocol analysis of multistage decision strategies. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 77, 459–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Takemura, K. (1996a). Ishikettei no shinri: sono katei no kenkyu [Psychology of decision-making: Investigation of its process]. Tokyo: Fukumura Shuppan.Google Scholar
  33. Takemura, K. (1996b). Ishikettei to sono sien [Decision making and decision support]. In S. Ichikawa (Ed.), Ninchi shinrigaku 4kan shiko [Cognitive Psychology 4: Thought] (pp. 81–105). Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.Google Scholar
  34. Takemura, K. (1996c). Pojiteibu na kanjo to shakai kodo [Positive affect and social behavior]. In S. Tsuchida & K. Takemura (Eds.), Shiko to kodo, ninchi, seiri: Kanjo no shakai shinrigaku [Affect, cognition, behavior, and physiology] (pp. 151–177). Tokyo: Seishin Shobo.Google Scholar
  35. Takemura, K. (1997a). Shohisha no joho tansaku to sentakushi hyoka [Alternative evaluation and consumer buying decision]. In T. Sugimoto (Ed.), Shohisha rikai no tame no shinrigaku [Understanding in consumer psychology] (pp. 56–72). Tokyo: Fukumura Shuppan.Google Scholar
  36. Takemura, K. (1997b). Shiko, handan to kanjo [Affect, judgment, and thought]. In H. Kaiho (Ed.), Atatakai ninchi no shinrigaku: ninchi to kanjo no yusetsu gensyo no hushigi [Psychology of hot cognition] (pp. 77–97). Tokyo: Kaneko Shobo.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kazuhisa Takemura
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyWaseda UniversityTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations