Experimental Studies of Modern Human Social and Individual Learning in an Archaeological Context: People Behave Adaptively, But Within Limits

  • Alex MesoudiEmail author
Part of the Replacement of Neanderthals by Modern Humans Series book series (RNMH)


It has been proposed that one reason for the success of Homo sapiens is our advanced learning abilities. Theoretical models suggest that complex cultural adaptations can arise from an optimal mix of (1) individual learning that is of sufficient accuracy plus (2) social learning that is of sufficiently high fidelity and is payoff-biased. Here I review the findings of a series of experimental studies of human learning, designed to simulate the kind of technology-based tasks that our ancestors would have faced. Results of these studies support the predictions of the models, and show that contemporary humans’ learning strategies are broadly adaptive. Performance typically improves through effective individual learning and payoff-biased social learning. The latter crucially allows participants to escape low-fitness locally optimal artifact designs and jump to higher-fitness designs, assuming a realistic multimodal adaptive landscape underlying artifact fitness. On the other hand, people also exhibited predictable flaws in their learning, such as the copying of neutral traits exhibited by successful models along with their functional traits (i.e., cultural hitchhiking), and an unwillingness to share information with others under certain circumstances.


Cultural evolution Cumulative culture Individual learning Social learning 


  1. Akazawa T (ed) (2012) Replacement of Neanderthals by modern humans (RNMH) project series, vol 1. RNMH Project Group, Kochi University of Technology, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  2. Aoki K, Wakano JY, Feldman MW (2005) The emergence of social learning in a temporally changing environment: a theoretical model. Curr Anthropol 46:334–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aoki K, Lehmann L, Feldman MW (2011) Rates of cultural change and patterns of cultural accumulation in stochastic models of social transmission. Theor Popul Biol 79:192–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aoki K, Wakano JY, Lehmann L (2012) Evolutionarily stable learning schedules and cumulative culture in discrete generation models. Theor Popul Biol 81:300–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Atkisson C, Mesoudi A, O’Brien MJ (2012) Adult learners in a novel environment use prestige-biased social learning. Evol Psychol 10:519–537Google Scholar
  6. Bentley RA, Hahn MW, Shennan SJ (2004) Random drift and culture change. Proc R Soc B 271:1443–1450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bettinger RL, Eerkens J (1999) Point typologies, cultural transmission, and the spread of bow-and-arrow technology in the prehistoric Great Basin. Am Antiq 64:231–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boyd R, Richerson PJ (1985) Culture and the evolutionary process. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  9. Boyd R, Richerson PJ (1988) An evolutionary model of social learning: the effects of spatial and temporal variation. In: Zentall T, Galef BG (eds) Social learning. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 29–48Google Scholar
  10. Boyd R, Richerson PJ (1992) How microevolutionary processes give rise to history. In: Nitecki M, Nitecki DV (eds) History and evolution. State University of New York Press, Albany, pp 178–209Google Scholar
  11. Boyd R, Richerson PJ (1995) Why does culture increase human adaptability? Ethol Sociobiol 16:125–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cavalli-Sforza LL, Feldman MW (1981) Cultural transmission and evolution. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  13. Cheshier J, Kelly RL (2006) Projectile point shape and durability: the effect of thickness: length. Am Antiq 71:353–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dean LG, Kendal RL, Schapiro SJ, Thierry B, Laland KN (2012) Identification of the social and cognitive processes underlying human cumulative culture. Science 335:1114–1118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dunnell RC (1978) Style and function: a fundamental dichotomy. Am Antiq 35:305–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Durham WH (1991) Coevolution: genes, culture, and human diversity. Stanford University Press, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  17. Ehn M, Laland KN (2012) Adaptive strategies for cumulative cultural learning. J Theor Biol 301:103–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Enquist M, Ghirlanda S, Jarrick A, Wachtmeister CA (2008) Why does human culture increase exponentially? Theor Popul Biol 74:46–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gergely G, Csibra G (2006) Sylvia’s recipe: the role of imitation and pedagogy in the transmission of cultural knowledge. In: Enfield NJ, Levenson SC (eds) Roots of human sociality: culture, cognition, and human interaction. Berg, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  20. Henrich J, Boyd R (1998) The evolution of conformist transmission and the emergence of between-group differences. Evol Hum Behav 19:215–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Henrich J, Gil-White FJ (2001) The evolution of prestige. Evol Hum Behav 22:165–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hill K, Barton M, Hurtado AM (2009) The emergence of human uniqueness. Evol Anthropol 18:187–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hrubesch C, Preuschoft S, van Schaik C (2009) Skill mastery inhibits adoption of observed alternative solutions among chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Anim Cogn 12:209–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jensen K, Call J, Tomasello M (2007) Chimpanzees are rational maximizers in an ultimatum game. Science 318:107–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Laland KN (2004) Social learning strategies. Learn Behav 32:4–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lycett SJ, von Cramon-Taubadel N (2008) Acheulean variability and hominin dispersals: a model-bound approach. J Archaeol Sci 35:553–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Marshall-Pescini S, Whiten A (2008) Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and the question of cumulative culture: an experimental approach. Anim Cogn 11:449–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McElreath R, Lubell M, Richerson PJ, Waring TM, Baum W, Edsten E, Efferson C, Paciotti B (2005) Applying evolutionary models to the laboratory study of social learning. Evol Hum Behav 26:483–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mesoudi A (2007) Using the methods of social psychology to study cultural evolution. J Soc Evol Cult Psychol 1:35–58Google Scholar
  30. Mesoudi A (2008) An experimental simulation of the ‘copy-successful-individuals’ cultural learning strategy: Adaptive landscapes, producer-scrounger dynamics and informational access costs. Evol Hum Behav 29:350–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mesoudi A (2009) The cultural dynamics of copycat suicide. PLoS One 4:e7252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mesoudi A (2011a) An experimental comparison of human social learning strategies: payoff-biased social learning is adaptive but underused. Evol Hum Behav 32:334–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mesoudi A (2011b) Variable cultural acquisition costs constrain cumulative cultural evolution. PLoS One 6:e18239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mesoudi A, Jensen K (2012) Culture and the evolution of human sociality. In: Vonk J, Shackelford T (eds) The oxford handbook of comparative evolutionary psychology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 419–433Google Scholar
  35. Mesoudi A, O’Brien MJ (2008a) The cultural transmission of Great Basin projectile point technology I: an experimental simulation. Am Antiq 73:3–28Google Scholar
  36. Mesoudi A, O’Brien MJ (2008b) The cultural transmission of Great Basin projectile point technology II: an agent-based computer simulation. Am Antiq 73:627–644Google Scholar
  37. Morgan TJH, Rendell LE, Ehn M, Hoppitt W, Laland KN (2012) The evolutionary basis of human social learning. Proc R Soc B 279:653–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Neiman FD (1995) Stylistic variation in evolutionary perspective - inferences from decorative diversity and interassemblage distance in Illinois woodland ceramic assemblages. Am Antiq 60:7–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. O’Brien MJ, Darwent J, Lyman RL (2001) Cladistics is useful for reconstructing archaeological phylogenies: Palaeoindian points from the southeastern United States. J Archaeol Sci 28:1115–1136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Powell A, Shennan S, Thomas MG (2009) Late Pleistocene demography and the appearance of modern human behavior. Science 324:1298–1301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Richerson PJ, Boyd R (2005) Not by genes alone. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  42. Rogers AR (1988) Does biology constrain culture? Am Anthropol 90:819–831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rogers DS, Ehrlich PR (2008) Natural selection and cultural rates of change. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:3416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Silk JB, Brosnan SF, Vonk J, Henrich J, Povinelli DJ, Richardson AS, Lambeth SP, Mascaro J, Schapiro SJ (2005) Chimpanzees are indifferent to the welfare of unrelated group members. Nature 437:1357–1359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Simon HA (1956) Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychol Rev 63:129–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sperber D (1996) Explaining culture: a naturalistic approach. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  47. Stout D (2002) Skill and cognition in stone tool production. Curr Anthropol 43:693–722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tennie C, Call J, Tomasello M (2009) Ratcheting up the ratchet: on the evolution of cumulative culture. Philos Trans R Soc B 364:2405–2415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wright S (1932) The roles of mutation, inbreeding, crossbreeding and selection in evolution. Proceedings of the sixth international congress of genetics 1:356–366Google Scholar
  50. Yamamoto S, Humle T, Tanaka M (2013) Basis for cumulative cultural evolution in chimpanzees: social learning of a more efficient tool-use technique. PLoS One 8:e55768CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Anthropology and Centre for the Coevolution of Biology and CultureDurham UniversityDurhamUK

Personalised recommendations