Reappraisal of Constraints on R-parity Violation from EDM at the Leading Order

  • N. Yamanaka
Part of the Springer Theses book series (Springer Theses)


Now that we have all ingredients to calculate the R-parity violating (RPV) contribution to the electric dipole moment (EDM), we will analyze the constraints on RPV interactions given by the current experimental data. In this chapter, we will first perform the analysis by assuming that one RPV bilinear dominates, and do this analysis for each RPV bilinears. This is the method adopted in many previous works.


Electric Dipole Moment Neutron Electric Dipole Moment Electron Electric Dipole Moment Large Theoretical Uncertainty Electric Dipole Moment Experiment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    J.J. Hudson et al., Nature 473, 493 (2011)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    D. Chang, W.-F. Chang, M. Frank, W.-Y. Keung, Phys. Rev. D 62, 095002 (2000)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    B.C. Regan et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 071805 (2002)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    P. Herczeg, Phys. Rev. D 61, 095010 (2000)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    J.F. Donoghue, C.R. Nappi, Phys. Lett. B 168, 105 (1986)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    K. Takeda, S. Aoki, S. Hashimoto, T. Kaneko, T. Onogi, N. Yamada, JLQCD Collaboration, in PoS LATTICE2010, 160 (2010) [arXiv:1012.1907 [hep-lat]]Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    T.P. Cheng, L.F. Li, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 1441 (1989)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    W.C. Griffith et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 101601 (2009)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    V.A. Dzuba, V.V. Flambaum, S.G. Porsev, Phys. Rev. A 80, 032120 (2009)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    V.V. Flambaum, I.B. Khriplovich, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 89, 1505 (1985)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    N. Yamanaka, T. Sato, T. Kubota, Phys. Rev. D 85, 117701 (2012)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    C.A. Baker et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 131801 (2006)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    S. Ban, J. Dobaczewski, J. Engel, A. Shukla, Phys. Rev. C 82, 015501 (2010)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    J. Ellis, J.S. Lee, A. Pilaftsis, JHEP 1010, 049 (2010)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    A.R. Zhitnitsky, Phys. Rev. D 55, 3006 (1997)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    H. Ohki et al., JLQCD Collaboration. Phys. Rev. D 78, 054502 (2008)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    K. Takeda et al., Phys. Rev. D 83, 114506 (2011)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    V.V. Flambaum, I.B. Khriplovich, Sov. Phys. JETP 62, 872 (1985)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    J. Ellis, J.S. Lee, A. Pilaftsis, JHEP 1102, 045 (2011)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    J. Ellis, J.S. Lee, A. Pilaftsis, arXiv:1009.1151 [math.OC]Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Center for Nuclear PhysicsOsaka UniversityIbarakiJapan

Personalised recommendations