Skip to main content

ECD for Small Intestine Transplantation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Marginal Donors

Abstract

The prognosis of intestinal failure has improved dramatically owing to the development of parenteral nutrition. However, parenteral nutrition-related complications, such as central venous catheter infection, venous access thrombosis, and intestinal failure associated with liver disorder, are still major causes of mortality in patients with intestinal failure. Intestinal transplantation can significantly improve their prognosis and quality of life. Intestinal transplantation has become an established treatment for intestinal failure, with more than 2,300 intestinal transplants performed worldwide.

However, an accepted definition of marginal intestinal donor has not been definitively established. Among the most prominent donor characteristics that may influence graft survival include older age, cardiopulmonary arrest, viral status, graft size mismatch, and elevated liver function tests (LFTs). More long-term determinants of poor patient and graft survival are crossmatch positivity and donor-specific antigen positivity.

According to current donor criteria for intestinal transplantation, extended criteria for donation of intestinal transplant grafts include donor age 50–60 years, CPR longer than 10 min, ABO compatibility, ICU stay from 1 week up to 2 weeks, high doses of vasopressors, elevated LFTs, sodium level 150–160 mEq/L, and a compatible donor–recipient size match. Any extended criteria donor graft should be considered potentially suitable for the patients on long waiting lists and not be discarded without seeking timely intestinal transplantation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Fishbein TM. Intestinal transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(10):998–1008.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Grant D. Small bowel transplant registry. In: 12th international small bowel transplant symposium. Washington, USA. 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  3. HRSA. Annual data report 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kato T, Tzakis AG, Selvaggi G, et al. Intestinal and multivisceral transplantation in children. Ann Surg. 2006;243(6):756–64. discussion 764–6.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mangus RS, Fridell JA, Vianna RM, et al. Comparison of histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate solution and University of Wisconsin solution in extended criteria liver donors. Liver Transpl. 2008;14(3):365–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mazariegos GV, Steffick DE, Horslen S, et al. Intestine transplantation in the United States, 1999–2008. Am J Transplant. 2010;10(4 Pt 2):1020–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Yersiz H, Renz JF, Hisatake GM, et al. Multivisceral and isolated intestinal procurement techniques. Liver Transpl. 2003;9(8):881–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Furukawa H. Establishment of educational program for multi-organ procurement from deceased donors. Ministry of Health and Laber Welfare, Japan. 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Barr ML, Belghiti J, Villamil FG, et al. A report of the Vancouver Forum on the care of the live organ donor: lung, liver, pancreas, and intestine data and medical guidelines. Transplantation. 2006;81(10):1373–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pascher A, Kohler S, Neuhaus P, et al. Present status and future perspectives of intestinal transplantation. Transpl Int. 2008;21(5):401–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gondolesi G, Fauda M. Technical refinements in small bowel transplantation. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2008;13(3):259–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tzakis AG, Kato T, Levi DM, et al. 100 multivisceral transplants at a single center. Ann Surg. 2005;242(4):480–90. discussion 491–3.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Abu-Elmagd K, Fung J, Bueno J, et al. Logistics and technique for procurement of intestinal, pancreatic, and hepatic grafts from the same donor. Ann Surg. 2000;232(5):680–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Benedetti E, Holterman M, Asolati M, et al. Living related segmental bowel transplantation: from experimental to standardized procedure. Ann Surg. 2006;244(5):694–9.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. de Ville de Goyet J, Mitchell A, Mayer AD, et al. En block combined reduced-liver and small bowel transplants: from large donors to small children. Transplantation. 2000;69(4):555–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fischer-Frohlich CL, Konigsrainer A, Schaffer R, et al. Organ donation: when should we consider intestinal donation. Transpl Int. 2012;25(12):1229–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Matsumoto CS, Kaufman SS, Girlanda R, et al. Utilization of donors who have suffered cardiopulmonary arrest and resuscitation in intestinal transplantation. Transplantation. 2008;86(7):941–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Keitel E, Michelon T, dos Santos AF, et al. Renal transplants using expanded cadaver donor criteria. Ann Transplant. 2004;9(2):23–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Furukawa H, Manez R, Kusne S, et al. Cytomegalovirus disease in intestinal transplantation. Transplant Proc. 1995;27(1):1357–8.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Abu-Elmagd K, Reyes J, Bond G, et al. Clinical intestinal transplantation: a decade of experience at a single center. Ann Surg. 2001;234(3):404–16. discussion 416–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zaroff JG, Rosengard BR, Armstrong WF, et al. Consensus conference report: maximizing use of organs recovered from the cadaver donor: cardiac recommendations, March 28–29, 2001, Crystal City, VA. Circulation. 2002;106(7):836–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rushton SN, Hudson AJ, Collett D, et al. Strategies for expanding the UK pool of potential intestinal transplant donors. Transplantation. 2013;95(1):234–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ruiz P, Carreno M, Weppler D, et al. Immediate antibody-mediated (hyperacute) rejection in small-bowel transplantation and relationship to cross-match status and donor-specific C4d-binding antibodies: case report. Transplant Proc. 2010;42(1):95–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wei L, Hata K, Doorschodt BM, et al. Experimental small bowel preservation using Polysol: a new alternative to University of Wisconsin solution, Celsior and histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate solution? World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13(27):3684–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Olson DW, Fujimoto Y, Madsen KL, et al. Potentiating the benefit of vascular-supplied glutamine during small bowel storage: importance of buffering agent. Transplantation. 2002;73(2):178–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Leuvenink HG, van Dijk A, Freund RL, et al. Luminal preservation of rat small intestine with University of Wisconsin or Celsior solution. Transplant Proc. 2005;37(1):445–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Oltean M, Joshi M, Bjorkman E, et al. Intraluminal polyethylene glycol stabilizes tight junctions and improves intestinal preservation in the rat. Am J Transplant. 2012;12(8):2044–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhu JZ, Castillo EG, Salehi P, et al. A novel technique of hypothermic luminal perfusion for small bowel preservation. Transplantation. 2003;76(1):71–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Tsujimura T, Salehi P, Walker J, et al. Ameliorating small bowel injury using a cavitary two-layer preservation method with perfluorocarbon and a nutrient-rich solution. Am J Transplant. 2004;4(9):1421–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takehisa Ueno .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Japan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ueno, T. (2014). ECD for Small Intestine Transplantation. In: Asano, T., Fukushima, N., Kenmochi, T., Matsuno, N. (eds) Marginal Donors. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54484-5_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54484-5_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo

  • Print ISBN: 978-4-431-54483-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-4-431-54484-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics