Advertisement

Social Systems Design in Organizational Change

  • Doug WaltonEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Translational Systems Sciences book series (TSS, volume 1)

Abstract

The pressing need for the continuous redesign of organizational operating models increases the demand for new approaches to conducting design. To manage this, a new approach must created that embeds the capability to redesign the organization at all levels, not just the in the offices of executives or process experts. Social Systems Design provides important underpinnings for how to architect such collaborations. Inherent to this approach is the realization that designing complex social systems is not just a construction or specification process, but rather a human knowledge development process. This paper outlines a design approach based on social systems design for constructing participatory design on a large scale. The approach shows how interweaving knowledge development, knowledge capture, and the appropriate levels of design can facilitate an evolutionary methodology. A brief case study of how the approach was applied in a major high tech corporation is give to illustrate the approach.

Keywords

Large-scale change Participatory design Social systems design Transformational change 

References

  1. Ackoff, R. L., Magidson, J. & Addison, H. J. (2006). Idealized design: Creating an organization’s future. Upper Saddle River: Wharton.Google Scholar
  2. Banathy, B. H. (1992). A systems view of education. Concepts and principles for effective practice. Englewood Cliffs: Educational Technology Publications.Google Scholar
  3. Banathy, B. H. (1996). Designing social systems in a changing world. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bohm, D., & Nichol, L. (1996). On dialogue. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (2000). The social life of information. Boston: Harvard Business School.Google Scholar
  6. Cao, G., Clarke, S., & Lehaney, B. (2001). A critique of BPR from a holistic perspective. Business Process Management Journal, 7(4), 332–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Checkland, P. (1981). Systems thinking, systems practice. Chichester [Sussex]/New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  8. Cialdini, R. B. (2001). Influence: Science and practice (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  9. de Bono, E. (2006). De Bono’s thinking course. England: BBC Active/Pearson.Google Scholar
  10. El-Shinnawy, M., & Vinze, A. S. (1998). Polarization and persuasive argumentation: A study of decision making in group settings. MIS Quarterly, 22(2), 165–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Isaacs, W. (1999). Dialogue and the art of thinking together: A pioneering approach to communicating in business and in life (1st ed.). New York: Currency.Google Scholar
  12. Oshry, B. (2007). Seeing systems: Unlocking the mysteries of organizational life (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.Google Scholar
  13. Roberto, M. A. (2007). Why great leaders don’t take yes for an answer: Managing for conflict and consensus. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education, Inc.Google Scholar
  14. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  15. Walton, D. (2004). Modeling organizational systems: Banathy’s three lenses revisited. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 17(4), 265–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Yankelovich, D. (1999). The magic of dialogue. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Saybrook UniversitySan FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations