Advertisement

Designing the Means for Governing the Commons

  • Thomas R. FlanaganEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Translational Systems Sciences book series (TSS, volume 1)

Abstract

Empirical studies of emergent democratic social systems reveal elements which consistently are evoked during the design phase of the new institutions. Considerable scholarly work has been invested in understanding these elements and rationalizing how they collectively represent a precondition for building stable new democratic structures. Less attention has been directed at this time to optimizing this process by considering sequences with which the design elements might be evoked within specific civic contexts. This chapter represents a contribution to our thinking about possibilities for optimizing democratic emergence with enhanced collaborative design methodologies.

The design methodology illustrated is called Structured Dialogic Design in the United States and Structured Democratic Dialogue in Europe. It is a derivative of Interactive Management co-invented by Alexander N. Christakis and John N. Warfield in the 1970s. The method applies the engineering tool of Interpretive Structural Modeling within a soft systems context so that citizens of greatly varied levels of technological capacity can contribute equally in complex systems design. In its various forms, the design method has been used most consistently and extensively in the nation rebuilding efforts of the citizens of Cyprus over the past 20 years. The generic use of this method to design contextually-tuned pathways for democratic emergence has not previously been reported.

Keywords

Collaborative design Democratic design Large group design Social systems design Systemic design 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The author is grateful for the encouragement and guidance that Dr. Kenneth C. Bausch provided in the effort to honor the contributions of the Ostroms and their colleagues in a concise and readable fashion.

References

  1. Bovens, M., Schillemans, T., & Hart, P. (2008). Does public accountability work? An assessment tool. Public Administration, 86(1), 225–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Christakis, A. N., & Bausch, K. C. (2006). How people harness their collective wisdom and power to construct the future. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  3. Denning, S. (2011). The leader's guide to storytelling: Mastering the art and discipline of business narrative. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; Wiley.Google Scholar
  4. Esri Hosts WWW Conference (2012/2013). Reinventing the art of conversation. ArcNews, 34(2). Accessed from http://www.esri.com/esri-news/arcnews/winter1213articles/esri-hosts-www-conference-reinventing-the-art-of-conversation (Winter).
  5. Flanagan, T. R. (2008). Scripting a collaborative narrative: An approach for spanning boundaries. Design Management Review, 19(3), 80–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Flanagan, T. R., & Bausch, K. C. (2012). Body wisdom in dialogue. Riverdale: Ongoing Emergence Press.Google Scholar
  7. Flanagan, T. R., & Christakis, A. N. (2010). The talking point: Creating an environment for exploring complex meaning. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  8. Gabriel, Y. (2000). Storytelling in organizations: Facts, fictions, and fantasies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Golemon, L. A. (2010). Finding our story: Narrative leadership and congregational change. Herndon: Alban Institute.Google Scholar
  10. Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243–1248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hardin, G. (1978). Political requirements for preserving our common heritage. In H. P. Bokaw (Ed.), Wildlife and America (pp. 310–317). Washington, D.C.: Council on Environmental Quality.Google Scholar
  12. Hester, R. L., & Walker-Jones, K. (2009). Know your story and lead with it: The power of narrative in clergy leadership. Herdon: The Alban Institute.Google Scholar
  13. Koontz, T. M., & Thomas, C. W. (2006). What do we know and need to know about the environmental outcomes of collaborative management? Public Administration Review, 66(6), 111–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lasswell, H. D. (1963). The future of political science. New York: Atherton.Google Scholar
  15. Mansbridge, J., Bohman, J., Chambers, S., Estlund, D., Follesdal, A., Fung, A., et al. (2010). The place of self-interest and the role of power in deliberative democracy. Journal of Political Philosophy, 18(1), 64–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ostrom, E. (1996). Covenants, collective action, and common-pool resources. In K. E. Soltan & S. L. Elkin (Eds.), The constitution of good societies (pp. 23–38). Pennsylvania State University Press: University Park.Google Scholar
  18. Ostrom, E., Dietz, T., Dogal, N., Stern, P. C., Stanich, S., & Weber, E. U. (2002). The drama of the commons: Committee on the human dimensions of global change. Washington, D.C.: Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council, National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  19. Ostrom, V., & Ostrom, E. (1971). Public choice: A different approach to the study of public administration. Public Administration Review, 37, 203–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  21. Rader, D. (2011). Engaged resistance: American Indian art, literature, and film from Alcatraz to the NMAI. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  22. Robertson, P. J., & Tang, S.-Y. (1995). The role of commitment in collective action: Comparing the organizational behavior and rational choice perspectives. Public Administration Review, 55(1), 67–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Romzek, B. S., LeRoux, K., & Blackmar, J. M. (2012). A preliminary theory of informal accountability among network organizational actors. Public Administration Review, 72, 442–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Secretary Panetta on Defense Priorities – C-SPAN Video Library. (n.d.). C-SPAN video library. Accessed from http://c-spanvideo.org/program/PanettaonD
  25. Sharp, G. (1993). From dictatorship to democracy: A conceptual framework for liberation. East Boston: The Albert Einstein Institution.Google Scholar
  26. Simmons, A. (2006). The story factor. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  27. Thomson, A. M., & Perry, J. L. (2006). Collaboration processes: Inside the black box. Public Administration Review, 66, 20–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Trice, H. M., & Beyer, J. M. (1993). The cultures of work organizations. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  29. Wheatley, M. J. (1999). Leadership and the new science: Discovering order in a chaotic world. San Francisco: Barrett-Koehler Publishers.Google Scholar
  30. Wondolleck, J. M., & Yaffee, S. L. (2000). Making collaboration work: Lessons from innovation in natural resource management. Washington, D.C.: Island.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for 21st Century Agoras, New England OfficeBarringtonUSA

Personalised recommendations