Skip to main content

Importance of Breast Imaging Before and After RFA Therapy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Non-surgical Ablation Therapy for Early-stage Breast Cancer
  • 568 Accesses

Abstract

Preoperative breast imaging plays an important role in selecting the appropriate breast-conserving surgery, and breast imaging before radiofrequency ablation (RFA) therapy is important for identifying eligible patients. Moreover, in order to ensure the safety of RFA, it is necessary to demonstrate its effects by postoperative imaging. However, there is currently only limited evidence of the usefulness of breast imaging after RFA therapy, and its utility for follow-up examination after breast-conserving surgery has not yet been elucidated.

In this chapter, we (1) describe the available follow-up imaging techniques after breast-conserving surgery, (2) explain the eligibility criteria for RFA therapy at our hospital, (3) describe early imaging after RFA therapy as a method of evaluating the results of RFA, (4) discuss the utility of postoperative follow-up RFA imaging, and (5) report the results of follow-up imaging after RFA therapy in our hospital.

Between 2006 and 2013, we performed a pilot study of RFA therapy without surgical excision for T1 breast cancer, and based on our results of this study, we believe that breast imaging before and after RFA therapy is very important.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1227–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1233–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Smith RA, Duffy SW, Gabe R et al. The randomized trials of breast cancer screening: what have we learned?. Radiol Clin North Am. 2004;42:793–806.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Belli P, Costantini M, Romani M, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer recurrence. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2002;73:223–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Coulthard A, Beveridge CJ, Potterton AJ. MRI in routine breast cancer follow-up: correlation with clinical outcome. Clin Radiol. 1999;54(7):459–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Veronesi U, Luini A, Galimberti V, et al. Conservation approaches for the management of stage I/II carcinoma of the breast: Milan Cancer Institute trials. World J Surg. 1994;18:70–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. El-Tamer MB, Ward BM, Schifftner T, Neumayer L, Khuri S, Henderson W. Morbidity and mortality following breast cancer surgery in women: national benchmarks for standards of care. Ann Surg. 2007;245:665–71.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Arvold ND, Taghian AG, Niemierko A, et al. Age, breast cancer subtype approximation, and local recurrence after breast-conserving therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:3885–91.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Clarke M, Collins R, Darby S, et al. Effects of radiotherapy and of differences in the extent of surgery for early breast cancer on local recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet. 2005;366:2087–106. Review.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Schiller DE, Le LW, Cho BC, et al. Factors associated with negative margins of lumpectomy specimen: potential use in selecting patients for intraoperative radiotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:833–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Waljee JF, Hu ES, Newman LA, et al. Predictors of re-excision among women undergoing breast-conserving surgery for cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:1297–303.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kurniawan ED, Wong MH, Windle I, et al. Predictors of surgical margin status in breast-conserving surgery within a breast screening program. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:2542–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Davis PL, Staiger MJ, Harris KB, et al. Breast cancer measurements with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasonography, and mammography. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1996;37:1–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Susini T, Nori J, Olivieri S, Livi L, Bianchi S, Mangialavori G, et al. Radiofrequency ablation for minimally invasive treatment of breast carcinoma: a pilot study in elderly inoperable patients. Gynecol Oncol. 2007;104:304–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jeffrey SS, Birdwell RL, Ikeda DM, Daniel BL MD, Nowels KW, Dirbas FM, et al. Radiofrequency ablation of breast cancer: first report of an emerging technology. Arch Surg. 1999;134:1064–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Oura S, Tamaki T, Hirai I, Yoshimasu T, Ohta F, Nakamura R, et al. Radiofrequency ablation therapy in patients with breast cancers two centimeters or less in size. Breast Cancer. 2007;14:48–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kinoshita T, Iwamoto E, Tsuda H, et al. Radiofrequency ablation as local therapy for early breast Carcinomas. Breast Cancer. 2011;18:10–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Nagashima T, Sakakibara M, Nakamura R, Arai M, Kadowaki M, Kazama T, et al. Dynamic enhanced MRI predicts chemosensitivity in breast cancer patients. Eur J Radiol. 2006;60:270–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nagashima T, Suzuki M, Yagata H, Hashimoto H, Shishikura T, Imanaka N, et al. Dynamic-enhanced MRI predicts metastatic potential of invasive ductal breast cancer. Breast Cancer. 2002;9:226–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yamamoto N, Fujimoto H, Nakamura R, et al. Pilot study of radiofrequency ablation therapy without surgical excision for T1 breast cancer: evaluation with MRI and vacuum-assisted core needle biopsy and safety management. Breast Cancer. 2011;18:3–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ito T, Oura S, Yamamoto N, et al. Radiofrequency ablation of breast cancer. A multicenter retrospective analysis. J Clin Oncol 2012;30(15):suppl;abstr 1119.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Clinical Trial Registration URL:http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm. Unique identifier: UMIN000008675

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rikiya Nakamura .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Japan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nakamura, R., Yamamoto, N. (2016). Importance of Breast Imaging Before and After RFA Therapy. In: Kinoshita, T. (eds) Non-surgical Ablation Therapy for Early-stage Breast Cancer. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54463-0_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54463-0_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo

  • Print ISBN: 978-4-431-54462-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-4-431-54463-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics