Abstract
The finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) method has been the only choice of time-domain methods for practical applications with its simplicity and efficiency. However, the simple discretization of the simple wave equation model in which the method has its basis is not sufficient for modeling more complex wave propagation phenomena, high-accuracy simulations, or acoustic fields with complex geometries. In this chapter, alternative time-domain methods that may be applied to such situations are discussed as follows: the linearized Euler equation (LEE) method, the constrained interpolation profile (CIP) method, and the finite-volume time-domain (FVTD) method. The LEE method is applicable to wave propagation phenomena under the influence of arbitrary background flows. The main application of the method is sound propagation simulations outdoors where wind effects are not negligible. The CIP method is characteristic in that the method is in principle free from numerical dispersion. The characteristic allows simulations with high phase accuracy. The FVTD method is constructed on an unstructured grid system. The method thus has an advantage in modeling complex geometries compared to the FDTD method where orthogonal structured grid is used.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
D. Heimann, R. Blumrich, Time-domain simulations of sound propagation through screen-induced turbulence. Appl. Acoust. 65(6), 561–582 (2004)
V.E. Ostashev, D.K. Wilson, L. Liu, D.F. Aldridge, N.P. Symons, D. Marlin, Equations for finite-difference, time-domain simulation of sound propagation in moving inhomogeneous media and numerical implementation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 117(2), 503–517 (2005)
T. van Renterghem, D. Botteldooren, Prediction-step staggered-in-time FDTD: An efficient numerical scheme to solve the linearized equations of fluid dynamics in outdoor sound propagation. Appl. Acoust. 68(2), 201–216 (2007)
S.K. Lele, Compact finite difference schemes with spectral-like resolution. J. Comput. Phys. 103, 16–42 (1992)
C. Arakawa, in Computational Fluid Dynamics for Engineering (University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo, 1994) (in Japanese)
J.C. Hardin, J.R. Ristorcelli, C.K.W. Tam, in ICASE/LaRC Workshop on Benchmark Problems in Computational Aeroacoustics (CAA). NASA Conference Publications, pp. 3300 (1995)
T. Yabe, F. Xiao, T. Utsumi, Constrained interpolation profile method for multiphase analysis. J. Comput. Phys. 169, 556–593 (2001)
T. Yabe, T. Utsumi, Y. Ogata, The Constrained Interpolation Profile Method (Morikita, Tokyo, 2003). (in Japanese)
T. Aoki, Multi-dimensional advection of CIP (cubic interpolated propagation) scheme. Comput. Fluid Dynamics J. 4, 279–291 (1995)
K. Okubo, S. Oh, T. Tsuchiya, N. Takeuchi, The examination on the three-dimensional acoustic field analysis using the CIP method. IEICE Technical Report, US2006-52:25–30, (2006) (in Japanese)
S. Oh, K. Okubo, T. Tsuchiya, N. Takeuchi, Analysis of acoustic field using the type-C CIP method. IEICE Technical Report, US2006-98:17–22 (2006) (in Japanese)
M. Konno, K. Okubo, T. Tsuchiya, N. Tagawa, Performance of various types of constrained interpolation profile method for two-dimensional numerical acoustic simulation. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 47, 3962–3963 (2008)
Y. Tachioka, Y. Yasuda, T. Sakuma, Application of the constrained interpolation profile method to room acoustic problems: Examination of boundary modeling and spatial/time discretization. Acoust. Sci. Tech. 33, 22–32 (2012)
T. Ishizuka, K. Okubo, Y. Ara, Variable-grid technique for sound field analysis using the constrained interpolation profile method. Acoust. Sci. Tech. 33, 387–390 (2012)
G. Szego, in Orthogonal Polynomials (American Mathematical Society, Providence, 1939)
K. Okubo, S. Oh, T. Tsuchiya, N. Takeuchi, Consideration of the boundary condition between two media in acoustic field analysis using the constrained interpolation profile (CIP) method. IEICE Trans. Fundam. E90-A, 2000–2005 (2007) (in Japanese)
G. Mur, Absorbing boundary conditions for the finite difference approximation of the time domain electromagnetic-field equation. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 45, 377–382 (1981)
J.P. Berenger, A perfectly matched layer for the absorption of electromagnetic waves. J. Comput. Phys. 114, 185–200 (1994)
Y. Ando, M. Hayakawa, Implementation of the perfectly matched layer to the CIP method. IEICE Trans. Electron. E98-C, 645–648 (2006)
T. Ishizuka, K. Okubo, Formulation and examination of the perfectly matched layer for sound field analyses using the constrained interpolation profile method. Acoust. Sci. Tech. 34, 378–381 (2013)
Q. Qui, T.L. Geers, Evaluation of the perfectly matched layer for computational acoustics. J. Comput. Phys. 139, 166–183 (1998)
H. Jasak, Error analysis and estimation for the finite volume method with applications to fluid flows. PhD thesis, Imperial College, June 1996
Architectural Institute of Japan, Benchmark platform on computational methods for architectural/environmental acoustics. http://gacoust.hwe.oita-u.ac.jp/AIJ-BPCA/
C. Geuzaine, J.-F. Remacle, Gmsh: a three-dimensional finite element mesh generator with built-in pre- and post-processing facilities. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 79, 1309–1331 (2009)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Japan
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Oshima, T., Ishizuka, T., Okubo, K. (2014). Alternative Time-Domain Methods. In: Sakuma, T., Sakamoto, S., Otsuru, T. (eds) Computational Simulation in Architectural and Environmental Acoustics. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54454-8_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54454-8_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo
Print ISBN: 978-4-431-54453-1
Online ISBN: 978-4-431-54454-8
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)