Advertisement

Evaluation of Palm Decanter Cake as an Alternative Fish Feed

  • Ying Ping Chang
  • Jun Hoeng Chuah
Conference paper

Abstract

The oil palm industry is the backbone of Malaysia’s economic and social development. Palm oil mills generated considerable amount of waste or by-products that may be reutilized for other purposes. Decanter cake is one of the solid wastes produced from palm oil mills. The freshwater fish farming industry is ever expanding due to depleting sea resources. Since the cost of conventional aqua feeds amount to large portion of farmed fish cost, alternative plant-based material such as palm decanter cake may provide a financially viable solution for the industry. This study involved the compositional analysis of palm decanter cake and in vitro protein digestibility using selected freshwater fish gut crude enzymes on palm decanter cake. Decanter cake contained approximately 76 % moisture. The crude lipid, crude protein, crude fiber, and ash contents based on dried weight were 9.7, 13.9, 17, and 8.7 % respectively. Two types of local fishes: the Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) and the catfish (Clarias batrachus) were used for the in vitro protein digestibility study on palm decanter cake based on pH drop method. The fresh decanter cake showed approximately 23.5 and 54.9 % relative protein digestibility (RPD) using fish gut crude enzymes of Nile tilapia and catfish, respectively. The RPD obtained indicates that the decanter cake can be part of the protein source for both types of freshwater fish studied.

Keywords

Crude Protein Protein Digestibility Nile Tilapia Empty Fruit Bunch Fish Feed 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgment

This study was supported by Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Malaysia. Authors are thankful to Tian Siang Oil Mill Sdn Bhd and Kim Seng Fishery Co., located at Perak, Malaysia, for providing the palm decanter cake and the live specimens of freshwater fish, respectively.

References

  1. 1.
    Khalid H, Ahmad TM, Rohaya MH, Ahmad KD (2008) Palm-based bio-fertilizer from decanter cake and boiler ash of palm oil mill. http://palmoilis.mpob.gov.my/publications/TOT/TT-412.pdf. Accessed 28 Jan 2013
  2. 2.
    Dashini DOG (2009) Oil recovery from palm oil solid wastes. Dissertation, University Malaysia PahangGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department (2011) World Aquaculture 2010. http://www.fao.org/docrep/014/ba0132e/ba0132e.pdf. Accessed 18 Dec 2012
  4. 4.
    El-Saidy DMSD, Gaber MMA (2003) Replacement of fish meal with a mixture of different plant protein sources in juvenile Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus L. diets. Aquacult Res 34:1119–1127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Soltan MA, Hanafy MA, Wafa MIA (2008) Effect of replacing fish meal by a mixture of different plant protein sources in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus L.) diets. Global Vet 2:157–164Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Boisen S, Eggum BO (1991) Critical evaluation of in vitro methods for estimating digestibility in simple-stomach animals. Nutr Res Rev 4:141–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dimes LE, Haard NF (1994) Estimation of protein digestibility – 1. Development of an in vitro method for estimating protein digestibility in salmonids. Comp Biochem Physiol 108:349–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lemos D, Ezquerra JM, Garcia-Carreňo FL (1999) Protein digestion in penaeid shrimp: digestive proteinases, proteinase inhibitors and feed digestibility. Aquaculture 186:89–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Walsh MG (1991) Evaluation of dietary carbohydrate utilization by captive sable fish (Anoplopoma fimbria). Dissertation, University of British ColumbiaGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tacon AGJ, Metian M, Hasan MR (2009) Feed ingredients and fertilizers for farmed aquatic animals: sources and composition. FAO Fisheries Aquacult Tech Paper 540:3–6Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    AOAC (2005) Official methods of analysis, 18th edn. AOAC International, GaithersburgGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lazo JP (1994) Evaluation of several in vitro enzyme assay for estimating in vivo apparent protein digestibility by the Pacific white shrimp (Penaeus cannamel). Dissertation, Institute Technologic de Estudios Superiores de MonterreyGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Paepatung N, Nopharatana A, Songkasiri W (2009) Bio-methane potential of biological solid materials and agricultural wastes. Asian J Energ Environ 10:19–27Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dewayanto N (2010) Waste to valuable by products: utilization of carbonized decanter cake from palm oil milling plant as an effective adsorbent for heavy metal ions in aqueous solution. Dissertation, University Malaysia PahangGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mjoun K, Rosentrater KA, Brown ML (2010) Tilapia: environmental biology and nutritional requirements. South Dakota Cooperative Extension Service, USDA. http://pubstorage.sdstate.edu/AgBio_Publications/articles/FS963-02.pdf. Accessed 01 June 2013
  16. 16.
    Robinson EH, Li MH, Manning BB (2001) A practical guide to nutrition, feeds, and feeding of catfish. Bulletin 1113, Office of Agricultural Communication, Division of Agriculture, Forestry and Veterinary Medicine at Mississippi State University. http://www.aces.edu/dept/fisheries/aquaculture/documents/guidetocatfishfeeding.pdf. Accessed 01 June 2013
  17. 17.
    New MB, Tacon AGJ, Csavas I (eds) (1994) Farm-made aquafeeds. FAO Fisheries Tech Paper, 343, FAO, Rome. http://www.fao.org/docrep/003/v4430e/V4430E00.htm#TOC. Accessed 1 June 2013
  18. 18.
    Webster CD, Lim CE (eds) (2002) Nutrients requirements and feeding of finfish for aquaculture. CAB International, OxonGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wan Zahari M, Alimon AR, Wong HK (2012) Utilization of oil palm co-products as feeds for livestock in Malaysia. In: Makkar HPS (ed) Biofuel co-products as livestock feed: opportunities and challenges. FAO, Rome, http://www.fao.org/docrep/016/i3009e/i3009e.pdf. Accessed 19 June 2013Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Krogdahl Å, Hemre G-I, Mommsen TP (2005) Carbohydrates in fish nutrition: digestion and adsorption in postlarval stages. Aquaculture Nutr 11:103–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Abowei JFN, Ekubo AT (2011) Some principles and requirements in fish nutrition. Br J Pharmacol Toxicol 2:163–178Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemical Science, Faculty of ScienceUniversiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Jalan UniversitiKamparMalaysia

Personalised recommendations