An Investigation on Performance of 2D Simulated Fuel Cells Using Taguchi Method

  • Teck-Ming Ng
  • Nooryusmiza Yusoff
Conference paper


Clean and high efficient energy development has long been hunted to solve energy and environmental crisis. Fuel cells, which convert the chemical energy in fuel straight into electrical energy, are the key empowering technology of this era with an outstanding long-term performance. The future energy source is concerned with two of the most advanced fuel cells—direct methanol fuel cell (DMFC) and proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC). The motivation of this work is to develop mathematical models for investigating the best operating conditions and comparing the performance of PEMFC and DMFC. Two-dimensional fuel cell models were simulated based on physical laws to foresee the performance of the cell under several operating conditions. Taguchi method has been used to design experiments to study the effect of fuel and oxidant concentration, reactants’ flow direction, and membrane properties. Validating and running case studies of these models have been completed to present a comprehensive viewpoint of modeling. Lastly, comparing performance in term of current and power density between PEMFC and DMFC has been achieved. PEMFC has better performance compared to DMFC. A significant outcome of 2D simulations conducted was expected to maximize the fuel cells’ performance to be used in the transportation sector and portable applications.


Fuel Cell Orthogonal Array Taguchi Method Oxidant Concentration Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Smirnov A, Burt A, Celik I (2006) Multi-physics simulations of fuel cells using multi-component modeling. J Power Sources 158(1):295–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dyer CK (2002) Fuel cells for portable applications. J Power Sources 106(1–2):31–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Colpan CO, Funga A, Hamdullahpur F (2012) 2D modeling of a flowing-electrolyte direct methanol fuel cell. J Power Sources 209:301–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Siegel C (2008) Review of computational heat and mass transfer modeling in polymer-electrolyte-membrane (PEM) fuel cells. J Energy 33(9):1331–1352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Feng L, Cai W, Li C, Zhang J, Liu C, Xing W (2012) Fabrication and performance evaluation for a novel small planar passive direct methanol fuel cell stack. Fuel 94:401–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lottin O, Antoine B, Colinart T, Didierjean S, Maranzana G, Moyne C, Ramousse J (2009) Modeling of the operation of polymer exchange membrane fuel cells in the presence of electrodes flooding. Int J Thermal Sci 48(1):133–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemical EngineeringUniversiti Teknologi PETRONASTronohMalaysia

Personalised recommendations