Advertisement

High-Performance Work System and Safety Performance

  • Dayang Nailul Munna Abg Abdullah
  • Vanissa Karupaiah
Conference paper

Abstract

The purpose of conducting this study was to determine the relationship between high-performance work system (HPWS) determinants and safety performance among employees at the Carsem (M) Sdn. Bhd., Ipoh, Perak. One hundred and seventy respondents participated in this study, and they were chosen using simple random sampling technique. A survey questionnaire was used as a main instrument for data collection. From the Pearson correlation analysis, the findings revealed that there was a significant relationship between the studied variables, namely, safety training, self-managed teams, high-quality work, and safety performance. It was also revealed that the safety training was found to be the dominant factor of this study. As a conclusion, the diffusion of HPWS enables a clearer delineation of how these principles are translated into practice. Therefore, HPWS can be integrated in an organization, in order to bring great improvements in employees’ job performance as well as safety performance.

Keywords

Safety Performance Personal Protective Equipment Human Resource Practice Safety Training Degree Holder 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Lawler EE III (1996) From the ground up: six principles for building the new logic corporation. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Whitener EM (2001) Do “high commitment” human resource practices affect employee commitment? A cross-level analysis using hierarchical linear modeling. J Manag 27:515–535Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Werner S, Schuler RS, Jackson SE (2012) Human resource management, 11th edn. Cengage Learning, South-Western, MasonGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Way SA (2002) High performance work systems and intermediate indicators of firm performance within the U.S. small business sector. J Manag 28:765–785Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wood S, Wall TD (2002) Human resource management and business performance. In: Warr P (ed) Psychology at work. Penguin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Snell S, Bohlander G (2013) Principles of human resource management, 16th edn. Cengage Learning, South-Western, MasonGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lawler EE (1992) The ultimate advantage: creating the high involvement organization. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lawler EE, Mohrman SA, Ledford GE (1995) Creating high performance organizations: practices and results of employee involvement and total quality management in fortune 1000 companies. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Guthrie JP (2001) High involvement work practices, turnover and productivity: evidence from New Zealand. Acad Manage J 44:180–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Huselid MA (1995) The impact of human resource practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Acad Manage J 38:645–672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Berg P (1999) The effects of high performance work practices on job satisfaction in the United States steel industry. Ind Relat 54:111–134Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Godard J (2001) High performance and the transformation of work? The implications of alternative work practices for the experience and outcomes of work. Ind Labor Relat Rev 54:776–805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Komaki J, Heinzmann AT, Lawson L (1980) Effect of training and feedback: component analysis of a behavioral safety program. J Appl Psychol 65:261–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Neal A, Griffin MA (2006) A study of the lagged relationships among safety climate, safety motivation, safety behavior, and accidents at the individual and group levels. J Appl Psychol 91:946–953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Campbell JP, Gasser MB, Oswald FL (1996) The substantive nature of job performance variability. In: Murphy KR (ed) Individual differences and behavior in organizations. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Borman WC, Motowidlo SJ (1993) Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Polit DF, Beck CT (2004) Nursing research, principles and methods, 7th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Awang Z (2012) Research methodology and data analysis, 2nd edn. UiTM Press, Shah Alam, SelangorGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Barling J, Kelloway EK, Iverson RD (2003) High-quality jobs, job satisfaction and occupational safety. J Appl Psychol 88:276–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Osterman P (1995) Skill, training, and work organization in American establishments. Ind Relat 34:125–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Campbell JP, McCloy RA, Oppler SH, Sager CE (1993) A theory of performance. In: Schmitt J, Borman WC et al (eds) Personnel selection in organizations. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Simard M, Marchand A (1997) Workgroups’ propensity to comply with safety rules: the influence of micro-macro organizational factors. Ergonomics 40:172–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kirkman BL (1999) Beyond self-management: antecedents and consequences of team empowerment. Acad Manage J 42(1):8–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tjosvold D (1990) Flight crew collaboration to manage safety risks. Group Organ Stud 15:177–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    London M, Holt H, Larsen L, Nelleman T (1999) Relationships between feedback and self-development. Group Organ Manag 24(1):5–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bailey T, Berg P, Sandy C (2001) The effect of high-performance work practices on employee earnings in the steel, apparel, and medical electronics and imaging industries. Ind Labor Relat Rev 54:525–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tsui AS, Pearce JL, Porter LW, Tripoli AM (1997) Alternative approaches to the employee-organization relationship: does investment in employees pay off? Acad Manage J 40:1089–1121CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dayang Nailul Munna Abg Abdullah
    • 1
  • Vanissa Karupaiah
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of Business ManagementUniversiti Teknologi MARAKuala SelangorMalaysia
  2. 2.Department of Human Resource ManagementSaito CollegePetaling JayaMalaysia

Personalised recommendations