Skip to main content

Mill and Infant Industry

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Developments of International Trade Theory

Part of the book series: Advances in Japanese Business and Economics ((AJBE,volume 2))

  • 1872 Accesses

Abstract

Starting with Adam Smith’s criticism against mercantilism, economists of the classical school generally advocated the free trade and were critical to the protection of domestic industries. J. S. Mill admitted, however, the protection of the so-called infant industry, though he imposes a condition which an industry must satisfy to be protected. Then, it was Bastable who followed Mill to add another necessary condition for protection. This Mill–Bastable infant industry dogma was discussed critically by some modern economists from the point of view of the dynamic theory of the gains from trade.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    It is to be noted that, to measure the utility in terms of money, we are here implicitly assuming the constancy of the marginal utility of money. In other words, the demand curve is considered as if it is the marginal utility curve. See Problems 6.1 and 6.2.

  2. 2.

    See Kemp (19601964, pp. 184–191). See, however, also Mundell (1957).

  3. 3.

    See Negishi (1968), and also Corden (1974, pp. 257–8).

Bibliography

  • Bastable, C. F. (1892). The commerce of nations. London; Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corden, W. M. (1974). Trade policy and economic welfare. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, J. R. (1946). Value and capital. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, M. C. (1960). The Mill–Bastable infant industry dogma. Journal of Political Economy, LXVIII, 65–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, M. C. (1964). The pure theory of international trade. Engelwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J. S. (1909). Principles of political economy. London: Longmans, Green and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mundell, R. A. (1957). International trade and factor mobility. American Economic Review, 47, 321–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Negishi, T. (1968). Protection of infant industry and dynamic internal economies. Economic Record, 44, 56–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Japan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Negishi, T., Negishi, T. (2014). Mill and Infant Industry. In: Developments of International Trade Theory. Advances in Japanese Business and Economics, vol 2. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54433-3_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics