Skip to main content

Small Intestinal Radiography

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Endoscopy in the Diagnosis of Small Intestine Diseases
  • 893 Accesses

Abstract

The advent of capsule endoscopy (CE) and balloon-assisted endoscopy (BAE) is revolutionizing the diagnosis of small intestinal disease, which has hitherto relied on radiographic methods. Endoscopic examination offers a range of advantages, and its future development and widespread adoption are expected. Conversely, the use of radiography can be anticipated to decline still further. However, it is unlikely that it will ever be possible to diagnose small intestinal disease using endoscopy alone, without any need for radiography. The small intestine is bordered on the proximal end by the esophagus, stomach, and duodenum, and on the distal end by the large intestine, and is the longest organ in the human body. These anatomical characteristics mean that it is no easy task to observe the small intestine in its entirety, even with the help of capsule and balloon endoscopy. Endoscopy may also encounter problems due to stenosis, adhesions, or unusual dispositions following surgery. From the disease perspective, although malignant conditions are less frequent compared with other parts of the gastrointestinal tract, chronic inflammatory disorders such as Crohn’s disease and lesions associated with systemic disorders are common. In such disorders, grasping the entire picture and describing responses to treatment and the natural course objectively is more important than observing localized areas in detail. Radiography is clearly superior to endoscopy in terms of grasping the entire picture and objectively describing areas or lesions. If imaging is performed properly and interpreted by a competent practitioner, radiography will still have an important role to play in the diagnosis of small intestinal disease. Mechanical advances have also improved visualization by CT and MRI, and these modalities have recently been used for procedures such as enterography and enteroclysis. Unlike regular radiography, these methods also provide information external to the lumen, and have the advantages of being performable even if intestinal tract obstruction is present as well as minimal invasiveness, meaning they will continue to hold important places in diagnostic imaging of the small intestine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Nakamura U et al. X-ray examination of the small intestine by means of duodenal intubation—double contrast study of the small bowel. Stom Intest. 1974;9:1461–9.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yao T. Double contrast enterolysis with air. In: Freeny PC, Stevenson GW, editors. Malgulis and Burhenne’s alimentaly tract radiology. St Louis: Mosby; 1994. p. 548–51.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Herlinger H. Enteroclysis technique and variations. In: Herlinger H, Maliglinte DDT, Birnbaum BA, editors. Clinical imaging of small intestine. 2nd ed. New York: Springer; 1999. p. 95–123.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Yorioka M et al. Newly devised small bowel sonde for air contrast barium study after enteroscopy. Stom Intest (in Japanese). 2011;46:500–6.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Colombel JF et al. Quantitative measurement and visual assessment of ileal Crohn’s disease activity by computed tomography enterography. Gut. 2006;55:1561–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Paulsen SR et al. CT enterography as a diagnostic tool in evaluating small bowel disorders: review of clinical experience with over 700 cases. Radiographics. 2006;26:641–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Low RN et al. Crohn disease with endoscopic correlation: single-shot fast spin-echo and gadolinium-enhanced fat-suppressed spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging. Radiology. 2002;222:652–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Koilakou S et al. Endoscopy and MR enteroclysis: equivalent tools in predicting clinical recurrence in patients with Crohn’s disease after ileocolic resection. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2010;16:198–203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Umschaden HW et al. Small-bowel disease: comparison of MR enteroclysis images with conventional enteroclysis and surgical findings. Radiology. 2000;215:717–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Negaard A et al. Magnetic resonance enteroclysis in the diagnosis of small-intestinal Crohn’s disease: diagnostic accuracy and inter-and intra-observer agreement. Acta Radiol. 2006;47:1008–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fumihito Hirai .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Japan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hirai, F. (2014). Small Intestinal Radiography. In: Matsui, T., Matsumoto, T., Aoyagi, K. (eds) Endoscopy in the Diagnosis of Small Intestine Diseases. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54352-7_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54352-7_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo

  • Print ISBN: 978-4-431-54351-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-4-431-54352-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics