Skip to main content

Development of the Codetermination System

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
German Business Management
  • 1045 Accesses

Abstract

Postwar Germany built a systematic framework for labor relations based on the Codetermination Act. A new framework for labor relations in the codetermination system provided an alternative to the US model, and was an important element that regulated Germany’s “Rheinland Model of capitalism” or the “coordinated market economy.” Therefore, this chapter discusses post WWII changes in labor relations under the codetermination system. First, it views characteristics of postwar labor relations in Japan, then considers the new framework for labor relations in Germany called the “dual system,” followed by the mechanism of corporate governance based on the codetermination system. On the basis of these discussions, this chapter examines the codetermination system’s significance from the perspectives of improvement in the flow of information between labor and management, promotion of cooperative and stable labor–capital relations, and safety net functions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abelshauser W (1999) Vom wirtschaftlichen Wert der Mitbestimmung: Neue Perspektiven ihrer Geschichte in Deutschland. In: Streeck W, Kluge N (eds) Mitbestimmung in Deutschland: Tradition und Effizienz, Expertenbericht für die Kommission Mitbestimmung Bertelsmann Stiftung/Hans-Böckler-Stiftung. Campus, Frankfurt am Main, pp 224–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Abelshauser W (2004) Deutsche Wirtschaftsgeschichte seit 1945. C. H. Beck, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Albert A (1991) Capitalisme contre Capitalisme. Ed. du Seuil, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen MMC (2006) The varieties of capitalism paradigm. Explaining Germany’s comparative advantage? Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Aoyama S (1981) Gendai “Nihonteki Roshikankei” no Tokusitsu to Saihen (Characteristics and reorganization of contemporary “Japanese industrial relations”. In: Hasegawa H (ed) Gendai Nihon Kigyo to Roshi Kankei (Contemporary Japanese enterprise and industrial relations). Rodo Jyunposha, Tokyo, pp 53–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertelsmann Stiftung, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung (eds) (1998) Mitbestimmung und neue Unternehmenskulturen—Bilanze und Perspektiven. Bericht der Kommission Mitbestimmung. Verlag Bartelsmann Stiftung, Gütersloh

    Google Scholar 

  • Chmielewicz K, Coenenberg AG, Köhler R et al (1981) Einleitung der Herausgeber. In: Chmielewicz K, Coenenberg AG, Köhler R et al (eds) Unternehmensverfassung. Poechel, Stuttagart, pp IX–XIII

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsche Industrieinstitut (ed) (1968) Mitbestimmung. Forderungen und Tatsachen. Deutsche Industrieinstitut, Köln

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberwein W (1992) Zur Geschichte und Soziologie der deutschen Betriebsverfassung. WSI Mitteilungen 45(8):499–504

    Google Scholar 

  • Futagami K (1971) Nishi Doitsu Kigyo Ron (West German enterprise). Toyo Keizai Shinposha, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Futagami K (1995) Keieiteki Kyodo Kettei Sisutemu (Codetermination system in enterprise). In: Takahashi T (ed) Koporeto Gabanansu (Corporate governance). Chuo Keizaisha, Tokyo, pp 129–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall PA, Soskice D (2001a) An introduction to varieties of capitalism. In: Hall PA, Soskice D (eds) Varieties of capitalism: the institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 1–68

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hall PA, Soskice D (eds) (2001b) Varieties of capitalism: the institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Hans Böckler Stiftung, Bertelsmann Stiftung (2003) Mitbestimmung für die Zukunft. Ergebnisse und Fazit aus der Arbeit des “Forum Mitbestimmung und Unternehmen” 1999–2003. http://www.bertelsmann-Stiftung.de/cps/rde/xchg/SID-OA000F14-A6259003/bst/hs.xsl/prj65046510.htm. Accessed 5 Sept 2007

  • Hayashi A (1993) Gekido no Jidai no Gendai Kigyo (Modern enterprise in the era of economic shock). Chuo Keizaisha, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrigel G (2000) American occupation, market order, and democracy: reconfiguring the steel industry in Japan and German after the Second World War. In: Zeitlin J, Herrigel G (eds) Americanization and its limits. Reworking US technology and management in post-war Europe and Japan. Oxford University Press, Okford, pp 340–399

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirano K (1976) Sengo Nihon ni okeru Roshi Kankei no Tenkai (Development of labor relations in Japan after WWII). In: Kimoto S (ed) Roshikankeiron (Labor relations). Nihon Hyoronsha, Tokyo, pp 193–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Jentsch WM (1995) Doitsu Kigyo ni okeru Roshikankei (Industrial relations in German enterprise). In: Ohashi S, Oda A, Schanz G (eds) Nihonteki Keiei to Doitsuteki Keiei (Japanese business management and German business management). Chikura Shobo, Tokyo, pp 217–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaido N (2005) Doitsu no Kigyo Taisei (Company constitution in Germany). Moriyama Shoten, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaneko M (1997) Shijyou to Seido no Seijikeizaigaku (Political economics of markets and institutions). Tokoyo Daigaku Shuppankai, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke RR (1996) The collapse of the American management Mystique. Oxford University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lompe K, Blöcker A, Marquardt B et al (2003) Bilanz und Perspektiven der Montanmitbestimmung, Entwicklung, Erfahrungen, Herausforderungen. Edition Sigma, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Maekawa K (1997) Nichidoku Hikaku Kigyoron eno Michi (Comparative study of Japanese enterprise and German enterprise). Moriyama Shoten, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitbestimmungskommission (1970) Mitbestimmung im Unternehmen. Bericht der Sachver­ständigen-kommission zur Auswertung der bisherigen Erfahrung bei der Mitbestimmung. W. Kohlhammer, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Mori G (1981) Nihonteki Roshikankei Sisutemu no Tokusitsu to Kongo no Tenbo (Characteristics and prospects of the Japanese industrial relations system). In: Mori G (ed) Nihon no Roshikankei Sisutemu (Industrial relations system in Japan). Nihon Rodo Kyokai, Tokyo, pp 359–385

    Google Scholar 

  • Murata K (1987) Roshi Kyodo Kettei no Keieigaku (Management study of codetermination), enlarged edn. Chikura Shobo, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Muszynski B (1975) Wirtschaftliche Mitbestimmung zwischen Konflikt und Harmoniekonzeptionen. Theorethische Voraussetzungen, geschichtlicher Grundlagen und Hauptprobleme der Mitbestimmungsdiskussion der BRD. A. Hain, Meisenheim am Glan

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1977) The development of industrial relations system. Some implications of Japanese experience, I, II. OECD, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohashi S (1982) Doitsuteki Keiei (German business management). In: Yoshida K, Ohashi S (eds) Doitsu Keieigaku Soron (General remarks on business administration in Germany). Chuo Keizaisha, Tokyo, pp 157–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Okouchi K (1980) Roshikankei Ron (Industrial relations). Rodo Junposha, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirker T, Braun S, Lutz B et al (1955) Arbeiter Management Mitbestimmung. Ein industriesoziologische Untersuchung der Struktur, der Organisation und des Verhaltens der Arbeiterbelegschaften in Werken der deutschen Eisen- und Stahlindustrie, für das Mitbestimmungsgesetz gilt. Ring-­Verlag, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Plettner B (1994) Abenteuer Elektrotechnik. Siemens und die Entwicklung der Elektrotechnik seit 1945. Pieper, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Roshikankei Chosakai (1963) Roshikankei to Ningen Kankei (2) (industrial relations and human relations (2)). Chuo Koron Jigyo Shuppan, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Schröter HG (2005a) Americanization of the European economy. A compact survey of American economic influence in Europe since the 1880s. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Schröter HG (2005b) Deutschlands Reintegration in die europäischen Wirtschaft. In: North M (ed) Deutsche Wirtschaftsgeschichte. Ein Jahrtausend im Überblick, 2., völlig überarbeitete und aktualisierte Auflage. C. H. Beck, München, pp 362–388

    Google Scholar 

  • Streeck W (1992) Social institutions and economic performance. Studies of industrial relations in advanced capitalist economies. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Streeck W (1997) German capitalism. In: Crouch C, Streeck W (eds) Political economy of modern capitalism: mapping convergence and diversity. Sage, London, pp 33–54

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sugaya A (1977) Roshikankei Ron no Kihon Mondai (Fundamental problems of industrial relations). Horitsu Bunkasha, Kyoto

    Google Scholar 

  • Takagi K (1962) Nishiyoroppa ni okeru Seisansei Undo (The productivity movement in Western Europe). Nihon Seisansei Honbu, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi K (1970) Nihonteki Roshikankei no Kenkyu (A study of Japanese labor relations), enlarged edn. Miraisha, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Tegtmeier W (1973) Wirkungen der Mitbestimmung der Arbeitnehmer—Eine sozial-ökonomische Analyse potentieller und faktischer Wirkungen der Mitbestimmung im Unternehmen und im Unternehmensexternen Breich. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Thelen KA (1991) Union of parts. Labor politics in postwar Germany. Cornell University Press, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Thelen K, Turner L (1999) Die deutsche Mitbestimmung im internationalen Vergleich. In: Streeck W, Kluge N (eds) Mitbestimmung in Deutschland: Tradition und Effizienz, Expertenbericht für die Kommission Mitbestimmung Bertelsmann Stiftung/Hans-Böckler-Stiftung. Campus, Frankfurt am Main, pp 153–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Tokunaga S (1977) Doitsu Shinshugi to Roshi Kankei (German capitalism and industrial relations). In: Tozuka H, Tokunaga S (eds) Gendai Roudo Mondai (Modern labour problems). Yuhikaku, Tokyo, pp 217–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Triesch G (1977) Gensoku seichyou ka no Roshi Kankei (Industrial relations during decelerating growth). In: Arisawa H, Okouchi K (eds) Seichou Keizai no Tenkan (Conversion of growing economy). Nihon Keizai Shinbunsha, Tokyo, pp 203–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Urabe K, Omura K (1983) Nihonteki Roshikankei no Tankyu (A study of Japanese industrial relations). Chuo Keizaisha, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoshida O (1994) Doitsu Kigyo Taisei Ron (German company structure). Moriyama Shoten, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeitlin J (2000) Introduction: Americanization and its limits: reworking US technology and management in post-war Europe and Japan. In: Zeitlin J, Herrigel G (eds) Americanization and its limits. Reworking US technology and management in post-war Europe and Japan. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 1–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Zugehör R (2003) Die Zukunft der rheinsichen Kapitalmarkt. Unternehmen zwischen Kapitalismus und Mitbestimmung. Leske+Budrich, Opladen

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Japan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Yamazaki, T. (2013). Development of the Codetermination System. In: German Business Management. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54303-9_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics