Abstract
Vulnerability to poverty at individual or household level may be defined as a probability that an individual or a household will be poor in the near future due to the consequences of different covariate and idiosyncratic shocks. In short, a household is vulnerable to poverty if it is likely to be poor in the near future. Morduch (1994) regarded households as vulnerable when their expected welfare status is above the poverty line but they are stochastically under the poverty line. Kurosaki (2002) regarded household as vulnerable to consumption risk if it has to reduce drastically its consumption level when the household is hit by a negative income shock. Vulnerability is also considered synonymous to transient or stochastic poverty. In non-technical language the term “vulnerability” may be termed as “defenselessness, insecurity, and exposure to risk, shocks and stress”. Vulnerability can be manifested in various aspects of life. It relates to poverty through the distress sale of productive assets; to physical weakness because more time and energy have to be substituted to earn more money to manage contingencies and to overcome powerlessness by depending on patrons and by being exploited by the powerful (Chamber 1989).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Amemiya T (1977) The maximum likelihood estimator and the non-linear three stage least square estimator in the general non-linear simultaneous equation model. Econometrica 45:955–968
Bebbington A (1999) Capitals and capabilities: a framework for analyzing peasant viability, rural livelihoods and poverty. World Dev 217(12):2021–2044
Chamber R (1989) Poverty in India: concepts, research and reality. Institute of Development Studies, Brighton, Discussion Paper 241
Chaudhuri S (2000) Empirical methods for assessing household vulnerability to poverty. Department of Economics, Columbia University, Mimeo
Chaudhuri S, Jalan J, Suryahadi A (2002) Assessing household vulnerability to poverty from cross-sectional data. A methodology and estimates for Indonesia. Department of Economics, Columbia University, New York, Discussion Paper Series No. 0102-52 (our measurements of vulnerability in this book, chapter 15, are based on these two works. Their results are drawn from Indonesian data sets)
Cox DR (1958) The regression analysis of binary sequences (with discussion). J R Stat Soc B 20:215–242 (APPAB)
Cox DR (1970) The analysis of binary data. Chapman and Hall, London
Dercon S (2001) Assessing vulnerability to poverty. Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford, Paper presented for the UK Department for International Development
Fox J (1984) Linear statistical models and related methods. Wiley, New York
Gujrati DN (2004) Basic econometrics. Tata McGraw-Hill, New Delhi
Haughton J, Khandker SR (2009) Handbook on poverty and inequality. The World Bank, Washington
Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (1989) Applied logistic regression. Wiley, New York
Kasirye I (2007) Vulnerability and poverty dynamics in Uganda, 1992–1999. University Library of Munich, Munich, MPRA Paper 8557
Kleinbaum DG, Klein M (2010) Logistic regression: a self-learning text, 3rd edn. Springer, New York (the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve is used to test the discriminatory performance of our logistic regression model of vulnerability in chapter 15)
Kurosaki T (2002) Consumption vulnerability and dynamic poverty in the north-west Frontier Province, Pakistan. Paper presented in seminar at Yale University, 2002
Lee ET (1980) Statistical methods for survival data analysis. Wadsworth, Belmont
Morduch J (1994) Poverty and vulnerability. Am Econ Rev 84(2):221–225
Okidi J, Mugambe GK (2002) An overview of chronic poverty and development policy in Uganda. University of Manchester, Manchester, CPRE Working Paper 11
Pritchet L, Shryahadi A, Sumarto S (2000) Quantifying vulnerability of poverty: a proposed measure applied to Indonesia. Social Monitoring and Early Response Unit, Jakarta
Rahman PMM, Matsui N, Ikemoto Y (2009) The chronically poor in rural Bangladesh: livelihood constraints and capabilities. Routledge, London (this work is the direct predecessor of current book which shows the result of 2004 survey of 1,282 households in rural Bangladesh)
Robert P (1992) Democracy, development and the civil community: evidence from Italian Experiment. Culture and development in Africa. In: Proceedings of an international conference held at the Work Bank, Washington
Suryahadi A, Sumarto S (2001) The chronic poor, the transient poor, and the vulnerable in indonesia before and after the crisis. SMERU Research Institute, Jakarta, SMERU Working Paper
Suryahadi A, Sumarto S (2003) Poverty and vulnerability in Indonesia before and after the economic crisis. Asian Econ J East Asian Econ Assoc 17(1):45–64
Tudawe I (2002) Chronic poverty and development policy in Sri Lanka: overview study. Institute for Development Policy and Management, University of Manchester, Manchester, CPRC Working Paper No. 9
Walker SH, Duncan DB (1967) Estimation of the probability of an event as a function of several independent variables. Biometrica 54:167–179
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Japan
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rahman, M., Matsui, N., Ikemoto, Y. (2013). Vulnerability to Poverty: Conceptual Framework and Measurement. In: Dynamics of Poverty in Rural Bangladesh. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54285-8_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54285-8_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo
Print ISBN: 978-4-431-54284-1
Online ISBN: 978-4-431-54285-8
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)