Skip to main content

Social Value: A Service Science Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Service Systems Science

Part of the book series: Translational Systems Sciences ((TSS,volume 2))

Abstract

This chapter provides an analysis of the concept of social value from a service science perspective. Social value is a concept of great interest to governments, foundations, nonprofits, and corporate social responsibility organizations and a central focus of many policymakers. Service science is an emerging transdiscipline for the (1) study of evolving service system entities and value co-creation phenomena and (2) pedagogy for the education of twenty-first-century T-shaped service innovators from all disciplines, sectors, and cultures who may become social value generators through cross functional engagements. A bridging framework for social value (as calculated by social entities) and individual value (as calculated by individual entities) is presented along with some future research directions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The knowledge burden of a society (species) derives from the need to ensure that the next generation has the knowledge required to run all technological and institutional/organizational systems needed to maintain the quality of life of theirs and future generations and continue innovating, thus growing the burden (Jones 2005).

  2. 2.

    Service science is short for the IBM-originated name of service science, management, and engineering (SSME), since service science was originally conceived to be the broad part of T-shaped professionals that complements depth in any disciplinary area with breadth in SSME (IBM 2011). More recently service science has been referred to as short for SSME+D, adding design (Spohrer and Kwan 2009). Even more recently, service science has been referred to as short for SSME+DAP, adding design, art, and policy. The naming of a transdiscipline is especially challenging, and communities can debate pros and cons of names endlessly.

  3. 3.

    New sciences may seem like stamp collecting or counting stamps to scientists in more mature sciences. For example, Lord Rutherford said, “All science is either physics or stamp collecting.” Service science is still at the stage of counting and categorizing types of entities, interactions, and outcomes.

  4. 4.

    Thanks to Paul Lillrank (Aalto University, Finland) for this thought.

References

  • Adams J (2000) Risk. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Angier N (1998) When nature discovers the same design over and over, New York Times Science section. Published: December 15, 1998. http://www.nytimes.com/1998/12/15/science/when-nature-discovers-the-same-design-over-and-over.html

  • Arthur WB (2009) The nature of technology: what it is and how it evolves. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Auerswald PE (2012) The coming prosperity: how entrepreneurs are transforming the global economy. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardhan I, Demirkan H, Kannan PK, Kauffman RJ, Sougstad R (2010) An interdisciplinary perspective on IT services management and services science. J Manag Inform Syst 26(4):13–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barile S, Polese F (2010) Smart service systems and viable service systems: applying systems theory to service science. Serv Sci 2(1–2):21–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulding KE (1956) General systems theory—the skeleton of science. Manag Sci 2(3):197–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Box GEP (1979) Robustness in the strategy of scientific model building. No. MRC-TSR-1954, Wisconsin Univ-Madison Mathematics Research Center

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough H, Spohrer J (2006) A research manifesto for services science. Comm ACM 49(7):35–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deacon TW (1997) The symbolic species: the co-evolution of language and brain. WW Norton & Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Demirkan H, Spohrer JC (2010) Servitized enterprises for distributed collaborative commerce. Int J Serv Sci Manag Eng Tech 1(1):68–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demirkan H, Kauffman RJ, Vayghan JA, Fill H-G, Karagiannis D, Maglio PP (2009) Service-oriented technology and management: perspectives on research and practice for the coming decade. Electron Commer Res Appl J 7(4):356–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engelbart DC (1995) Toward augmenting the human intellect and boosting our collective IQ. Comm ACM 38(8):30–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrucci D, Brown E, Chu-Carroll J, Fan J, Gondek D, Kalyanpur AA, Lally A, Murdock JW, Nyberg E, Prager J, Schlaefer N, Welty C (2010) Building Watson: an overview of the DeepQA project. AI Mag 31(3):59–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman D (2008) Morals and markets: an evolutionary account of modern life. Palgrave MacMillan, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman D, McNeill D (2013) Morals and markets: the dangerous balance. Palgrave MacMillan, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gorman M (2010) Trading zones and interactional expertise: creating new kinds of collaboration (Inside Technology). MIT Press: Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakansson NH, Kunkel JG, Ohlson JA (1982) Sufficient and necessary conditions for information to have social value in pure exchange. J Finance 37(5):1169–1181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawley AH (1986) Human ecology: a theoretical essay. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirshleifer J (1971) The private and social value of information and the reward to inventive activity. Am Econ Rev 61:561–574

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins E (1995) Cognition in the wild. MIT, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • IBM (2011) The invention of service science. http://www-03.ibm.com/ibm/history/ibm100/us/en/icons/servicescience/

  • Jones BF (2005) The burden of knowledge and the ‘death of the renaissance man’: is innovation getting harder? NBER Working Paper, No. 11360. May

    Google Scholar 

  • Kremer M (1993) Population growth and technological change: one million BC to 1990. Q J Econ 108(3):681–716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maglio PP, Spohrer JC (2013) A service science perspective on business model innovation. Industrial Market Manag 42(5):665–670

    Google Scholar 

  • Maglio PP, Srinivasan S, Kreulen J, Spohrer J (2006) Service systems, service scientists, SSME, and innovation. Comm ACM 49(7):81–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maglio PP, Vargo SL, Caswell N, Spohrer J (2009) The service system is the basic abstraction of service science. Inform Syst E Bus Manag 7(4):395–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnini VP, Ford JB, Markowski EP, Honeycutt ED Jr (2007) The service recovery paradox: justifiable theory or smoldering myth? J Serv Market 21(3):213–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March JG, Simon HA (1958) Organizations. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Motwani J, Ptacek R, Fleming R (2012) Lean sigma methods and tools for service organizations: the story of a cruise line transformation. Business Expert Press, Burlington, VT

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulgan G (2010) Measuring social value. Stanford Soc Innov Rev 8(3):38–43. http://www.ssireview.org/articles/entry/measuring_social_value

  • Newell A, Simon HA (1976) Computer science as empirical inquiry: symbols and search. Comm ACM 19(3):113–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng ICL (2012) Value and worth: creating new markets in the digital economy. Innovorsa Press, Warwick, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Ordanini A, Parasuraman P (2011) Service innovation viewed through a service-dominant logic lens: a conceptual framework and empirical analysis. J Serv Res 14(1):3–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (2009) Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom AL, Bitner MJ, Brown S, Burkhard K, Goul M, Smith-Daniels V, Demirkan H, Rabinovich E (2010) Moving forward and making a difference: research priorities for the science of service. J Serv Res 13(1):4–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricketts JA (2012) Reaching the goal: how managers improve a services business using Goldratt’s theory of constraints. Pearson Education, IBM Press, Upper Saddle River, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Rust RT, Zeithaml VA, Lemon KN (2000) Driving customer equity: how customer lifetime value is reshaping corporate strategy. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon HA (1996) The Sciences of the Artificial. MIT, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Spohrer J (2009) Service science and systems science: perspectives on social value. Proceedings of the 5th symposium of the 21st century COE program “Creation of agent-based social systems sciences” on February 27 and 28 2009, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, pp 9–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Spohrer J (2010) Whole service. http://service-science.info/archives/1056

  • Spohrer J (2012) A new engineering-challenge discipline: rapidly rebuilding societal infrastructure. http://service-science.info/archives/2189

  • Spohrer JJ, Demirkan H (2013) Understanding value co-creations and service innovations in time & space complexity: the abstract-entity-interaction-outcome-universals (AEIOU) theory. Unpublished Working Paper Available on Request

    Google Scholar 

  • Spohrer JC, Giuiusa A (2012) Exploring the future of cities and universities: a tentative first step. In: Proceedings of workshop on social design: contribution of engineering to social resilience, May 12. System Innovation. University of Tokyo, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Spohrer JC, Kwan SK (2009) Service Science, Management, Engineering, and Design (SSMED): an emerging discipline—outline & references. Int J Inform Syst Serv Sector (IJISSS) 1(3):1–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spohrer JC, Maglio PP (2010) Toward a science of service systems. In: Maglio PP, Spohrer JC (eds) Handbook of service science. Springer, New York, pp 157–194

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Spohrer JC, Maglio PP, Bailey J, Gruhl D (2007) Steps toward a science of service systems. IEEE Comput 40(1):71–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spohrer JC, Anderson L, Pass N, Ager T (2009) Service science and S-D logic. Proceedings of the 2009 Naples forum on service, June 16–19 2009, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Spohrer JC, Demirkan H, Krishna V (2011) Service and Science. In: Spohrer JC, Demirkan H, Krishna V (eds) The science of service systems. Springer, New York, pp 325–358

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Spohrer JC, Piciocchi P, Bassano C (2012) Three frameworks for service research: exploring multilevel governance in nested, networked systems. Serv Sci 4(2):147–160, June 2012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang V (2012) Survey: service science top open questions. http://service-science.info/archives/2071

  • Tracy S (2011) Service systems & social enterprise (MI thesis). University of Toronto. https://tspace.library.utoronto.ca/handle/1807/31608

  • Tracy S, Lyons K (2013) Service systems and the social enterprise. Hum Factors Ergon Manuf 23:28–36. doi:10.1002/hfm.20516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Lange PAM (1999) The pursuit of joint outcomes and equality in outcomes: an integrative model of social value orientation. J Pers Soc Psychol 77:337–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargo SL, Lusch RF (2004) Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. J Market 68(1):1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargo SL, Lusch RF (2008) Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution. J Acad Market Sci 36(1):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead AN (1911) An introduction to mathematics. Oxford UK: Oxford University Pres

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright R (2000) Non-Zero: the logic of human destiny. Vintage/Random House, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Discussions with many colleagues at service science-related conferences around the world as well as email and social media interactions with ISSIP.org members globally have helped shape these ideas.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haluk Demirkan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix: Concepts Discipline, Researcher, etc.

Appendix: Concepts Discipline, Researcher, etc.

Researchers from many disciplines have contributed to advancing service science and the study of service systems. Based on a sampling of publications (Spohrer 2013http://service-science.info/archives/2708), some disciplinary branches are partially summarized in the table below.

Concept

Discipline

Researcher

Journal

Conference

Association

Stakeholder customer

Marketing

Rust

JSR, CACM

Frontiers

AMA, INFORMS, ASA

 

Fisk

JSR

Frontiers, AMA SERVSIG

AMA

 

Bitner

JSR, CACM

Frontiers

AMA

 

Vargo

JM, JAMS

Frontiers

AMA

 

Lusch

JM, JAMS

Frontiers

AMA

 

Gronroos

JSR, JAMS

Frontiers, QUIS

FSSL

 

Edvardsson

JAMS

Frontiers, QUIS

 
 

Gummesson

JBIM

Forum, QUIS

SSEBA, ISQA

Stakeholder provider

Production operations

Sampson

JSR

POMS

POMS

Operations management

Neely

OMR

Alliance

EOMA

 

Davis

IBMSysJ, OMR

ArtSci

DSI, POMS

 

Metters

DS

POMS

DSI, INFORMS, POMS

 

Apte

POMS

POMS

POMS, DSI

Operations research

Larson

JoSS

 

INFORMS

 

Badinelli

JoSS

Forum

INFORMS,ISSIP

Stakeholder authority

Governance

Piciocchi

JoSS

Forum

ISSIP

 

Bassano

JoSS

Forum

ISSIP

Stakeholder competitor

Strategy

Polese

JoSS

Forum

ASVSA

 

Barile

JoSS

Forum

ASVSA

Resource people

Social sciences anthropology

Baba

CACM

HSSE

AAA NAPA

Cognitive science

Glushko

JSR, IBMSysJ

Frontiers, HSSE

CSS, OASIS

Human factors

Freund

HFEMSI

HSSE

HF&E, IIE, ISSIP

Resource technology

Industrial engineering

Rouse

IBMSysJ

 

IIE, INCOSE

System engineering

Tien

JSSE

 

IEEE, NAE

 

Berg

JSSE

 

IEEE, NAE

Resource information

Computer science

Spohrer

CACM, JAMS, Computer

Frontiers, HSSE, AMCIS

ACM, ISSIP

 

Maglio

CACM, JAMS, Computer

HICSS

ACM

Information systems

Alter

IBMSysJ

AMCIS

AIS, IFIP

 

Demirkan

CACM, ECRA, JMIS, JSR

AMCIS, HICSS

AIS, ISSIP

 

Kwan

IJISSS

AMCIS

AIS, ANSI, ISSIP

Information management

Karmarkar

MS

BIT

INFORMS

Resource organizations

Economic geography

Bryson

SIJ

  

Service systems

Ng

EMJ

Alliance

 

Social enterprises

Lyons

HFEMSI

HSSE

AIS, ISSIP

  1. Journals: CACM Communications of the ACM, Computer IEEE Computer, ECRA Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, EMJ European Management Journal, HFEMSI Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, IBMSysJ IBM Systems Journal, IJIMA International Journal of Internet Marketing and Advertising, IJSIM International Journal of Service Industry Management, IJISSS International Journal of Information Systems in the Service Sector, ISEBM Information Systems and E-Business Management, MS Management Science, JAMS Journal of the Academy of Marketing Sciences, JBIM Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, JOSM Journal of Service Management, JSR Journal of Service Science, JSSE Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, MSQ Managing Service Quality, OMJ Operations Management Research, SIJ The Service Industries Journal
  2. Conferences: Alliance Cambridge Alliance Conference, AHFE Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics Conference, AMA SERVIG AMA SERVIG Conference, AMCIS Americas Conference on Information Systems, ArtSci Art & Science of Service Conference, Frontiers Frontiers in Service Conference, HICSS Hawaii International Conference for Systems Sciences, HSSE AHFE Human-Side of Service Engineering, Forum Naples Service Forum, POMS Production and Operations Management Society, QUIS Quality in Services
  3. Associations: AAA American Anthropological Association, AAAS American Association for the Advancement of Science, ACM Association for Computing Machinery, AIS Association of Information Systems, AMA American Marketing Association, ANSI American National Standards Institute, ASA American Statistical Association, ASVSA Associazione per la ricerca sui Sistemi Vitali (Viable Systems), CSS Cognitive Science Society, DSI Decision Science Institute, EOMA European Operations Management Association, FSSL Finnish Society of Sciences and Letters, IEE Institute of Industrial Engineers, IEEE Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers, IEEE EMS IEEE Engineering Management Society, INFORMS Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences, ISQA International Service Quality Association, ISSIP International Society of Service Innovation Professionals, NAE US National Academy of Engineering, NAPA AAA National Association for the Practice of Anthropology, NYAS New York Academy of Sciences, OASIS Advancing Open Standards for the Information Society, SSEBA Swedish School of Economics and Business Administration

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Japan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Spohrer, J., Demirkan, H., Lyons, K. (2015). Social Value: A Service Science Perspective. In: Kijima, K. (eds) Service Systems Science. Translational Systems Sciences, vol 2. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54267-4_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics