Abstract
This chapter provides an analysis of the concept of social value from a service science perspective. Social value is a concept of great interest to governments, foundations, nonprofits, and corporate social responsibility organizations and a central focus of many policymakers. Service science is an emerging transdiscipline for the (1) study of evolving service system entities and value co-creation phenomena and (2) pedagogy for the education of twenty-first-century T-shaped service innovators from all disciplines, sectors, and cultures who may become social value generators through cross functional engagements. A bridging framework for social value (as calculated by social entities) and individual value (as calculated by individual entities) is presented along with some future research directions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The knowledge burden of a society (species) derives from the need to ensure that the next generation has the knowledge required to run all technological and institutional/organizational systems needed to maintain the quality of life of theirs and future generations and continue innovating, thus growing the burden (Jones 2005).
- 2.
Service science is short for the IBM-originated name of service science, management, and engineering (SSME), since service science was originally conceived to be the broad part of T-shaped professionals that complements depth in any disciplinary area with breadth in SSME (IBM 2011). More recently service science has been referred to as short for SSME+D, adding design (Spohrer and Kwan 2009). Even more recently, service science has been referred to as short for SSME+DAP, adding design, art, and policy. The naming of a transdiscipline is especially challenging, and communities can debate pros and cons of names endlessly.
- 3.
New sciences may seem like stamp collecting or counting stamps to scientists in more mature sciences. For example, Lord Rutherford said, “All science is either physics or stamp collecting.” Service science is still at the stage of counting and categorizing types of entities, interactions, and outcomes.
- 4.
Thanks to Paul Lillrank (Aalto University, Finland) for this thought.
References
Adams J (2000) Risk. Routledge, London
Angier N (1998) When nature discovers the same design over and over, New York Times Science section. Published: December 15, 1998. http://www.nytimes.com/1998/12/15/science/when-nature-discovers-the-same-design-over-and-over.html
Arthur WB (2009) The nature of technology: what it is and how it evolves. Free Press, New York
Auerswald PE (2012) The coming prosperity: how entrepreneurs are transforming the global economy. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Bardhan I, Demirkan H, Kannan PK, Kauffman RJ, Sougstad R (2010) An interdisciplinary perspective on IT services management and services science. J Manag Inform Syst 26(4):13–65
Barile S, Polese F (2010) Smart service systems and viable service systems: applying systems theory to service science. Serv Sci 2(1–2):21–40
Boulding KE (1956) General systems theory—the skeleton of science. Manag Sci 2(3):197–208
Box GEP (1979) Robustness in the strategy of scientific model building. No. MRC-TSR-1954, Wisconsin Univ-Madison Mathematics Research Center
Chesbrough H, Spohrer J (2006) A research manifesto for services science. Comm ACM 49(7):35–40
Deacon TW (1997) The symbolic species: the co-evolution of language and brain. WW Norton & Company, New York
Demirkan H, Spohrer JC (2010) Servitized enterprises for distributed collaborative commerce. Int J Serv Sci Manag Eng Tech 1(1):68–81
Demirkan H, Kauffman RJ, Vayghan JA, Fill H-G, Karagiannis D, Maglio PP (2009) Service-oriented technology and management: perspectives on research and practice for the coming decade. Electron Commer Res Appl J 7(4):356–376
Engelbart DC (1995) Toward augmenting the human intellect and boosting our collective IQ. Comm ACM 38(8):30–32
Ferrucci D, Brown E, Chu-Carroll J, Fan J, Gondek D, Kalyanpur AA, Lally A, Murdock JW, Nyberg E, Prager J, Schlaefer N, Welty C (2010) Building Watson: an overview of the DeepQA project. AI Mag 31(3):59–79
Friedman D (2008) Morals and markets: an evolutionary account of modern life. Palgrave MacMillan, New York
Friedman D, McNeill D (2013) Morals and markets: the dangerous balance. Palgrave MacMillan, New York
Gorman M (2010) Trading zones and interactional expertise: creating new kinds of collaboration (Inside Technology). MIT Press: Cambridge, MA
Hakansson NH, Kunkel JG, Ohlson JA (1982) Sufficient and necessary conditions for information to have social value in pure exchange. J Finance 37(5):1169–1181
Hawley AH (1986) Human ecology: a theoretical essay. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Hirshleifer J (1971) The private and social value of information and the reward to inventive activity. Am Econ Rev 61:561–574
Hutchins E (1995) Cognition in the wild. MIT, Cambridge
IBM (2011) The invention of service science. http://www-03.ibm.com/ibm/history/ibm100/us/en/icons/servicescience/
Jones BF (2005) The burden of knowledge and the ‘death of the renaissance man’: is innovation getting harder? NBER Working Paper, No. 11360. May
Kremer M (1993) Population growth and technological change: one million BC to 1990. Q J Econ 108(3):681–716
Maglio PP, Spohrer JC (2013) A service science perspective on business model innovation. Industrial Market Manag 42(5):665–670
Maglio PP, Srinivasan S, Kreulen J, Spohrer J (2006) Service systems, service scientists, SSME, and innovation. Comm ACM 49(7):81–85
Maglio PP, Vargo SL, Caswell N, Spohrer J (2009) The service system is the basic abstraction of service science. Inform Syst E Bus Manag 7(4):395–406
Magnini VP, Ford JB, Markowski EP, Honeycutt ED Jr (2007) The service recovery paradox: justifiable theory or smoldering myth? J Serv Market 21(3):213–225
March JG, Simon HA (1958) Organizations. Wiley, New York
Motwani J, Ptacek R, Fleming R (2012) Lean sigma methods and tools for service organizations: the story of a cruise line transformation. Business Expert Press, Burlington, VT
Mulgan G (2010) Measuring social value. Stanford Soc Innov Rev 8(3):38–43. http://www.ssireview.org/articles/entry/measuring_social_value
Newell A, Simon HA (1976) Computer science as empirical inquiry: symbols and search. Comm ACM 19(3):113–126
Ng ICL (2012) Value and worth: creating new markets in the digital economy. Innovorsa Press, Warwick, UK
Ordanini A, Parasuraman P (2011) Service innovation viewed through a service-dominant logic lens: a conceptual framework and empirical analysis. J Serv Res 14(1):3–23
Ostrom E (2009) Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Ostrom AL, Bitner MJ, Brown S, Burkhard K, Goul M, Smith-Daniels V, Demirkan H, Rabinovich E (2010) Moving forward and making a difference: research priorities for the science of service. J Serv Res 13(1):4–36
Ricketts JA (2012) Reaching the goal: how managers improve a services business using Goldratt’s theory of constraints. Pearson Education, IBM Press, Upper Saddle River, NJ
Rust RT, Zeithaml VA, Lemon KN (2000) Driving customer equity: how customer lifetime value is reshaping corporate strategy. Free Press, New York
Simon HA (1996) The Sciences of the Artificial. MIT, Cambridge
Spohrer J (2009) Service science and systems science: perspectives on social value. Proceedings of the 5th symposium of the 21st century COE program “Creation of agent-based social systems sciences” on February 27 and 28 2009, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, pp 9–33
Spohrer J (2010) Whole service. http://service-science.info/archives/1056
Spohrer J (2012) A new engineering-challenge discipline: rapidly rebuilding societal infrastructure. http://service-science.info/archives/2189
Spohrer JJ, Demirkan H (2013) Understanding value co-creations and service innovations in time & space complexity: the abstract-entity-interaction-outcome-universals (AEIOU) theory. Unpublished Working Paper Available on Request
Spohrer JC, Giuiusa A (2012) Exploring the future of cities and universities: a tentative first step. In: Proceedings of workshop on social design: contribution of engineering to social resilience, May 12. System Innovation. University of Tokyo, Tokyo
Spohrer JC, Kwan SK (2009) Service Science, Management, Engineering, and Design (SSMED): an emerging discipline—outline & references. Int J Inform Syst Serv Sector (IJISSS) 1(3):1–31
Spohrer JC, Maglio PP (2010) Toward a science of service systems. In: Maglio PP, Spohrer JC (eds) Handbook of service science. Springer, New York, pp 157–194
Spohrer JC, Maglio PP, Bailey J, Gruhl D (2007) Steps toward a science of service systems. IEEE Comput 40(1):71–77
Spohrer JC, Anderson L, Pass N, Ager T (2009) Service science and S-D logic. Proceedings of the 2009 Naples forum on service, June 16–19 2009, Italy
Spohrer JC, Demirkan H, Krishna V (2011) Service and Science. In: Spohrer JC, Demirkan H, Krishna V (eds) The science of service systems. Springer, New York, pp 325–358
Spohrer JC, Piciocchi P, Bassano C (2012) Three frameworks for service research: exploring multilevel governance in nested, networked systems. Serv Sci 4(2):147–160, June 2012
Tang V (2012) Survey: service science top open questions. http://service-science.info/archives/2071
Tracy S (2011) Service systems & social enterprise (MI thesis). University of Toronto. https://tspace.library.utoronto.ca/handle/1807/31608
Tracy S, Lyons K (2013) Service systems and the social enterprise. Hum Factors Ergon Manuf 23:28–36. doi:10.1002/hfm.20516
Van Lange PAM (1999) The pursuit of joint outcomes and equality in outcomes: an integrative model of social value orientation. J Pers Soc Psychol 77:337–349
Vargo SL, Lusch RF (2004) Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. J Market 68(1):1–17
Vargo SL, Lusch RF (2008) Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution. J Acad Market Sci 36(1):1–10
Whitehead AN (1911) An introduction to mathematics. Oxford UK: Oxford University Pres
Wright R (2000) Non-Zero: the logic of human destiny. Vintage/Random House, New York
Acknowledgments
Discussions with many colleagues at service science-related conferences around the world as well as email and social media interactions with ISSIP.org members globally have helped shape these ideas.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix: Concepts Discipline, Researcher, etc.
Appendix: Concepts Discipline, Researcher, etc.
Researchers from many disciplines have contributed to advancing service science and the study of service systems. Based on a sampling of publications (Spohrer 2013—http://service-science.info/archives/2708), some disciplinary branches are partially summarized in the table below.
Concept | Discipline | Researcher | Journal | Conference | Association |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stakeholder customer | Marketing | Rust | JSR, CACM | Frontiers | AMA, INFORMS, ASA |
Fisk | JSR | Frontiers, AMA SERVSIG | AMA | ||
Bitner | JSR, CACM | Frontiers | AMA | ||
Vargo | JM, JAMS | Frontiers | AMA | ||
Lusch | JM, JAMS | Frontiers | AMA | ||
Gronroos | JSR, JAMS | Frontiers, QUIS | FSSL | ||
Edvardsson | JAMS | Frontiers, QUIS | |||
Gummesson | JBIM | Forum, QUIS | SSEBA, ISQA | ||
Stakeholder provider | Production operations | Sampson | JSR | POMS | POMS |
Operations management | Neely | OMR | Alliance | EOMA | |
Davis | IBMSysJ, OMR | ArtSci | DSI, POMS | ||
Metters | DS | POMS | DSI, INFORMS, POMS | ||
Apte | POMS | POMS | POMS, DSI | ||
Operations research | Larson | JoSS | INFORMS | ||
Badinelli | JoSS | Forum | INFORMS,ISSIP | ||
Stakeholder authority | Governance | Piciocchi | JoSS | Forum | ISSIP |
Bassano | JoSS | Forum | ISSIP | ||
Stakeholder competitor | Strategy | Polese | JoSS | Forum | ASVSA |
Barile | JoSS | Forum | ASVSA | ||
Resource people | Social sciences anthropology | Baba | CACM | HSSE | AAA NAPA |
Cognitive science | Glushko | JSR, IBMSysJ | Frontiers, HSSE | CSS, OASIS | |
Human factors | Freund | HFEMSI | HSSE | HF&E, IIE, ISSIP | |
Resource technology | Industrial engineering | Rouse | IBMSysJ | IIE, INCOSE | |
System engineering | Tien | JSSE | IEEE, NAE | ||
Berg | JSSE | IEEE, NAE | |||
Resource information | Computer science | Spohrer | CACM, JAMS, Computer | Frontiers, HSSE, AMCIS | ACM, ISSIP |
Maglio | CACM, JAMS, Computer | HICSS | ACM | ||
Information systems | Alter | IBMSysJ | AMCIS | AIS, IFIP | |
Demirkan | CACM, ECRA, JMIS, JSR | AMCIS, HICSS | AIS, ISSIP | ||
Kwan | IJISSS | AMCIS | AIS, ANSI, ISSIP | ||
Information management | Karmarkar | MS | BIT | INFORMS | |
Resource organizations | Economic geography | Bryson | SIJ | ||
Service systems | Ng | EMJ | Alliance | ||
Social enterprises | Lyons | HFEMSI | HSSE | AIS, ISSIP |
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Japan
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Spohrer, J., Demirkan, H., Lyons, K. (2015). Social Value: A Service Science Perspective. In: Kijima, K. (eds) Service Systems Science. Translational Systems Sciences, vol 2. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54267-4_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54267-4_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo
Print ISBN: 978-4-431-54266-7
Online ISBN: 978-4-431-54267-4
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)