Generic Simulation Models to Evaluate Integrated Simulation Environment

  • Hyun Shik Oh
  • Do Hyung Kim
Conference paper
Part of the Proceedings in Information and Communications Technology book series (PICT, volume 4)


This paper presents a method to evaluate ISE, Integrated Simulation Environment, on which engineering models can be interoperate with each other. A set of generic simulation models is suggested to evaluate ISE. Some models of ground-to-air engagement are defined and developed as follows: aircraft, detect radar, launcher, and surface-to-air missile (SAM). Each model represents to be an engineering level model of the specific weapon system, which are used to analyze the MOP (measure of performance) of each system during the system development phase. Their functional properties, such as program structure and input/output for interoperation, are similar to those of real system’s simulation. Using these models, three types of engagement simulation can be tried: collecting based on source codes, linking them on a HLA/RTI federation as federates, and applying to ISE. Comparing the performances of these three simulation types, we will evaluate ISE in qualitative and quantitative manner. And, hopefully these models can be a reference for evaluating the next ISEs. This paper contains the beginning of this whole study. The detailed descriptions of each model and the results of the first one, source code collection, are presented.


Engineering Model Aircraft Model Engagement Simulation Generic Simulation Model Batch Simulation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Systems Acquisition Manager’s Guide for the use of Models and Simulations. In: DSMC (1994)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    McQuay, B.: The History and Significance of JMASS. Wright-Patterson AFB, OH (2000)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lee, K.S., et al.: Defense M&S Technology Research Center, Simulation Engine Lab. The 1st phase end report, ADD (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lee, S.J., et al.: A Study on Construction of Component Based Distributed Simulation Environment (Korean language). In: Proceedings of the 2011 KIMST Conference (2011)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bourassa, N.R.: Modeling and Simulation of Fleet Air Defense Systems Using EADSIM, p. 128. Naval Postgraduate School, Master Monterey (1993)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    User’s Guide: Tactical Engagement Simulation System RF Version 4.3 Master Interface, Tactical Technologies Inc. (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Roskam, J., et al.: Airplane Aerodynamics and performance, Univ of Kansas (1980)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Numerical Recipes in C : The Art of Scientific Computing, 2nd ed. W. H. Press, Cambridge University Press (1992)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fleeman, E.L. : Tactical Missile Design, 2nd edn. AIAA (2006)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Siouris, G.M.: Missile Guidance and Control Systems. Springer (2004)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    SIMDIS Manual, U.S. Naval Research Lab (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Tokyo 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hyun Shik Oh
    • 1
  • Do Hyung Kim
    • 1
  1. 1.Agency for Defense Development, Joint Modeling and Simulation DirectorateDaejeonKorea

Personalised recommendations