Skip to main content

Resources, Energy, and Environmental Load

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Environmental Systems Studies
  • 812 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter discusses energy conservation and efficient use of resources for improving energy and resource productivity. Regarding the environmental impacts of products and technology systems, life-cycle assessment (LCA) has been developed and applied extensively. The challenges, however, are interpretation of the findings, and how to consider the relationship between the environmental criteria and other evaluation criteria, such as economic efficiency. Renewable energy such as solar power is promising, but to promote its use, we must reform existing energy systems to make centralized systems and distributed systems work complementarily. Ultimately, these decisions will be made by the main players involved in decision making—whether they be consumers or producers, or the governments and municipalities entrusted to make decisions. Thus, it is important to prepare and provide environmental information conducive to decision making. Another efficient way to achieve environmental objectives is to set macro-level environmental management targets at the level of state, municipality, industry sector, community, etc., while utilizing market mechanisms to allow freedom of choice for the individual micro-level behavior of corporations and consumers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Japanese Ministry of the Environment (2010) Annual report on the quality of the environment, Government Publishing Office (Seifu-Kankobutsu-Center), Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  2. Liu Z, Koerwer J, Nemoto J, Imura H (2008) Physical energy cost serves as the “invisible hand” governing economic valuation: direct evidence from biogeochemical data and the U.S. metal market. Ecol Econ 67:104–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Costanza R (1980) Embodied energy and economic valuation. Science 210(4475):1219–1224

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. National Institute for Environmental Studies (NIES) of Japan. Embodied Energy and GHG Emissions Intensities Based on the 1995 (2000, 2005) Japanese input–output tables. http://www.cger.nies.go.jp/publications/report/d031/jpn/datafile/index.htm. Accessed date: December 8, 2012

  5. Odum HT (1971) Environment, power, and society. Wiley-Interscience, New York

    Google Scholar 

  6. Satterthwaite D (ed) (1999) Sustainable cities. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  7. Imura H (2009) Eco-cities: re-examining concepts and approaches. In: Fook LL, Gang C (eds) Towards a liveable and sustainable urban environment: eco-cities in East Asia. World Scientific, Singapore, pp 19–46

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rees WE (1999) Achieving sustainability: reform or transformation? In: Satterthwaite D (ed) Sustainable cities. Earthscan, London, pp 22–52

    Google Scholar 

  9. Girardet H (1999) Sustainable cities: a contradiction in terms? In: Satterthwaite D (ed) Sustainable cities. Earthscan, London, pp 413–425

    Google Scholar 

  10. Newman P, Kenworthy J (1999) Sustainability and cities: overcoming automobile dependence. Island, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  11. Perring C, Vincent JR (2001) Natural resource accounting and economic development: theory and practice. Edward Elgar, Northampton

    Google Scholar 

  12. UN, EC, IMF, OECD and World Bank (2003) Handbook of national accounting system of integrated environmental and economic accounting 2003. United Nations, European Commission, International Monetary Fund, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development and World Bank, New York

    Google Scholar 

  13. EC, IMF, OECD, UN & World Bank (2009) System of national accounts 2008. European Commission, International Monetary Fund, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, United Nations and World Bank, New York

    Google Scholar 

  14. OECD (2001) OECD environmental indicators towards sustainable development. OECD, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  15. ISO 14040 (2006) Environmental management—life cycle assessment—principles and framework. International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO), Geneve

    Google Scholar 

  16. ISO 14044 (2006) Environmental management—life cycle assessment—requirements and guidelines. International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO), Geneve

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cooper JS, Fava J (2006) Life cycle assessment practitioner survey: summary of results. J Ind Ecol 10:12–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. US Environmental Protection Agency (2010) Defining life cycle assessment. http://www.gdrc.org/uem/lca/lca-define.html. Accessed date: December 8, 2012

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Japan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Imura, H. (2013). Resources, Energy, and Environmental Load. In: Environmental Systems Studies. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54126-4_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics