Seeing and Understanding Connections Between Nature and Humanity

  • Hidefumi Imura


This chapter discusses the concepts and approaches of environmental systems studies that are concerned with the health and ills of the Earth. These studies are a system of scholarship that aims to help us understand the relationship between humanity and nature, and to create a positive relationship between the two. A major role of environmental systems studies is to make the invisible visible or make the complex easier to see. These studies are structured as a collection of the knowledge required for that purpose by using a variety of academic principles and methodologies. Both macro- and micro-approaches are necessary for the studies. Based on an extensive knowledge basis of micro-environmental studies, macro-environmental studies take the broad overarching perspective to describe the relationships between human activities and the environment, at the level of the entire globe, continents, countries, cities, and watersheds and to analyze the environmental constraints on human activities and the potential scope of human activities within those constraints.


Global Warming Environmental Study Entire Globe Water Drive Potential Scope 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Holland JH (1998) Emergence: from chaos to order. Helix Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Licata I, Sakaji A (eds) (2008) Physics of emergence and organization. World Scientific/Imperial College Press, Singapore/LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nicolis G, Prigogine I (1977) Self-organization in nonequilibrium systems. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nicolis G, Nicolis C (2007) Foundations of complex systems. World Scientific, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Haken H (1977) Synergetics, an introduction: nonequilibrium phase transitions and self-organization in physics, chemistry and biology. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Haken H (1983) Advanced synergetics. Instability, hierarchies and self-organizing systems and devices. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kauffman S (1993) The origins of order. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Prigogine I (1977) The end of certainty. The Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rosser JB (2011) From catastrophe to chaos: a general theory of economic discontinuities. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) (2007) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Odum HT (1988) Self-organization, transformity, and information. Science 242(4882): 1132–1139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Molles MC (1999) Ecology: concepts and applications. WCB/McGraw-Hill, BostgonGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cooley TF (1995) Frontiers of business cycle research. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Persky J (1995) Retrospectives the ethology of homo economicus. J Econ Perspect 9(2): 221–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE (eds) (2007) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Metz B, Davidson OR, Bosch PR, Dave R, Meyer LA (eds) (2007) Climate change 2007: mitigation of climate change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Core Writing Team, Pachauri RK, Reisinger A (eds) (2007) Climate change, 2007-synthesis report. IPCC, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    United Nations (1987) Report of the world commission on environment and development. General Assembly Resolution 42/187, 11 December 1987Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    World Commission on Environment and Development (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Eckersley R (1992) Environmentalism and political theory: toward an ecocentric approach. State University of New York Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Grey W (1993) Anthropocentrism and deep ecology. Australas J Philos 71:463–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hidefumi Imura
    • 1
  1. 1.Yokohama City UniversityYokohamaJapan

Personalised recommendations