Advertisement

Emotional Birds—Or Advanced Cognitive Processing?

  • Irene M. Pepperberg
Chapter
Part of the The Science of the Mind book series (The Science of the Mind)

Abstract

Grey parrots (Psittacus erithacus) have been shown to exhibit many complex cognitive and communicative abilities in a laboratory setting. The parrots’ successes likely rely on two factors: (a) an underlying neurological architecture that supports complex information processing, and (b) training involving social interaction and contextually-applicable rewards that enables them to express their capacities in ways measurable by human researchers (Pepperberg, The Alex Studies, 1999). Sometimes their behavior could not, however, be predicted from either their biology or their training, but rather involved what, in humans, would be called an emotional response to a situation. This paper describes four such situations, involving object permanence, phonation, insightful string-pulling, and numerical concepts. Each of these situations also required considerable cognitive processing; interestingly, such processing was seemingly stimulated by the concomitant emotional state. I thus suggest the possible existence in Grey parrots of a connection between emotional responses and cognitive processing such that their interaction synergistically supports successful outcomes, possibly related to how affect influences mental processing in humans.

Keywords

Emotional Response Phonological Awareness Cognitive Processing Object Permanence Grey Parrot 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Barrett LF, Barr M (2009) See it with feeling: affective predictions during object perception. Philos Trans R Soc B 364:1325–1334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barth CM, Funke J (2010) Negative affective environments improve complex problem solving performance. Cogn Emot 24:1259–1268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blanchette I, Richards A (2010) The influence of affect on higher level cognition: a review of research on interpretation, judgement, decision making and reasoning. Cogn Emot 24:561–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bloom L (2000) The intentionality model: how to learn a word, any word. In: Golinkoff RM, Hirsh-Pasek K, Bloom L, Smith LB, Woodward AL, Akhtar N, Tomasello M, Hollich G (eds) Becoming a word learner: a debate on lexical acquisition. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 124–135Google Scholar
  5. Boysen ST (1993) Counting in chimpanzees: nonhuman principles and emergent properties of number. In: Boysen ST, Capaldi EJ (eds) The development of numerical competence: animal and human models. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 39–59Google Scholar
  6. Ciompi L (1991) Affects as central organizing and integrating factors: a new psychosocial/biological model of the psyche. Br J Psychiatry 159:97–105PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Damasio A (1999) The feeling of what happens. Harcourt, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  8. Forgas JP (2007) When sad is better than happy: negative affect can improve the quality and ­effectiveness of persuasive messages and social influence strategies. J Exp Soc Psychol 43:513–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Frey S, Petrides M (2000) Orbitofrontal cortex: a key prefrontal region for encoding information. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:8723–8727PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fuson KC (1988) Children’s counting and concepts of number. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Geschwind N (1979) Specializations of the human brain. Sci Am 241:180–199PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gomez JC (1990) The emergence of intentional communication as a problem-solving strategy in the gorilla. In: Parker ST, Gibson KR (eds) “Language” and intelligence in monkeys and apes: comparative developmental perspectives. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 333–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Heinrich B (1995) An experimental investigation of insight in Common Ravens (Corvus corax). Auk 112:994–1003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Humphrey N (2000) The privatization of sensation. In: Heyes C, Huber L (eds) The evolution of cognition. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 241–252Google Scholar
  15. Jarvis JD, Güntürkün O, Bruce L, Csillag A, Karten H, Kuenzel W et al (2005) Avian brains and a new understanding of vertebrate evolution. Nat Rev Neurosci 6:151–159PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Koehler O (1950) The ability of birds to “count”. Bull Anim Behav 9:41–45Google Scholar
  17. Kröner S, Güntürkün O (1999) Afferent and efferent connections of the caudolateral neostriatum in the pigeon (Columba livia): a retro- and anterograde pathway tracing study. J Comp Neurol 407:228–260PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lögler P (1959) Versuche zur Frage des “Zähl”-Vermögens an einem Graupapagei und Vergleichs-versuche an Menschen. Z Tierpsychol 16:179–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Matsuzawa T, Itakura S, Tomonaga M (1991) Use of numbers by a chimpanzee: a further study. In: Ehara A, Kimura T, Takenaka O, Iwamoto M (eds) Primatology today. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 317–320Google Scholar
  20. Osthaus B, Lea SEG, Slater AM (2005) Dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) fail to show understanding of means-end connections in a string-pulling task. Anim Cogn 8:37–47PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pepperberg IM (1987) Evidence for conceptual quantitative abilities in the African Grey parrot: labeling of cardinal sets. Ethology 75:37–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pepperberg IM (1988) Acquisition of the concept of absence by an African Grey parrot: learning with respect to questions of same/different. J Exp Anal Behav 50:553–564PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pepperberg IM (1992) Proficient performance of a conjunctive, recursive task by an African Grey parrot (Psittacus erithacus). J Comp Psychol 106:295–305PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pepperberg IM (1994) Numerical competence in an African Grey parrot. J Comp Psychol 108:36–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pepperberg IM (1999) The Alex studies. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  26. Pepperberg IM (2004) “Insightful” string-pulling in Grey parrots (Psittacus erithacus) is affected by vocal competence. Anim Cogn 7:263–266PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pepperberg IM (2006a) Grey parrot (Psittacus erithacus) numerical abilities: addition and further experiments on a zero-like concept. J Comp Psychol 120:1–11PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pepperberg IM (2006b) Ordinality and inferential abilities of a Grey parrot (Psittacus erithacus). J Comp Psychol 120:205–216PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pepperberg IM (2007) Grey parrots do not always ‘parrot’: phonological awareness and the creation of new labels from existing vocalizations. Lang Sci 29:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pepperberg IM, Brezinsky MV (1991) Relational learning by an African Grey parrot (Psittacus erithacus): discriminations based on relative size. J Comp Psychol 105:286–294PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pepperberg IM, Carey S (accepted pending revision) Grey parrot number acquisition: the inference of cardinal value from ordinal position on the numeral list CognitionGoogle Scholar
  32. Pepperberg IM, Gordon JD (2005) Numerical comprehension by a Grey parrot (Psittacus erithacus), including a zero-like concept. J Comp Psychol 119:197–209PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pepperberg IM, Lynn SK (2000) Perceptual consciousness in Grey parrots. Am Zool 40:393–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pepperberg IM, Shive HA (2001) Simultaneous development of vocal and physical object combinations by a Grey parrot (Psittacus erithacus): bottle caps, lids, and labels. J Comp Psychol 115:376–384PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pepperberg IM, Wilcox SE (2000) Evidence for a form of mutual exclusivity during label acquisition by Grey parrots (Psittacus erithacus)? J Comp Psychol 114:219–231PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pepperberg IM, Willner MR, Gravitz LB (1997) Development of Piagetian object permanence in a Grey parrot (Psittacus erithacus). J Comp Psychol 111:63–75PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pepperberg IM, Vicinay J, Cavanagh P (2008) The Müller-Lyer illusion is processed by a Grey parrot (Psittacus erithacus). Perception 37:765–781PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pessoa L (2008) On the relationship between emotion and cognition. Nat Rev Neurosci 9:148–158. doi: 10.1038/nrn2317 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Premack D (1976) Intelligence in ape and man. Erlbaum, HillsdaleGoogle Scholar
  40. Revkin SK, Piazza M, Izard V, Cohen L, Dehaene S (2008) Does subitizing reflect numerical estimations? Psychol Sci 19:607–614PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rose J, Colombo M (2005) Neural correlates of executive control in the avian brain. PLoS Biol 3:e190. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030190 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Salzman CD, Fusi S (2010) Emotion, cognition, and mental state representation in amygdala and prefrontal cortex. Annu Rev Neurosci 33:173–202PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Thorpe WH (1963) Learning and instinct in animals. Methuen, LondonGoogle Scholar
  44. Vince M (1961) String pulling in birds. III. The successful response in greenfinches and canaries. Behaviour 17:103–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Werdenich D, Huber L (2006) A case of quick problem-solving in birds: string pulling in keas, Nestor notabilis. Anim Behav 71:855–863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wynn K (1990) Children’s understanding of counting. Cognition 36:155–193PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyHarvard UniversityCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations