Vibration Control for Bridge Girders


Wind-induced vibration of bridge girders needs to be considered as a part of the wind resistant design procedure in order to avoid unfavorable wind actions such as the collapse of the original Tacoma Narrows Bridge in 1940. The wind-induced vibration of bridge girders can be classified into the following three types


Bridge Deck Wind Tunnel Test Tuned Mass Damper Bridge Girder Main Span 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Japan Road Association (1991) Wind resistant design manual for highway bridges (in Japanese). Maruzen, Tokyo. Also revised version in 2007Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shiraishi N, Matsumoto M (1982) On vortex-induced oscillations of bluff cross sections used for bridge structures (in Japanese). In: Proceedings of the JSCE (322):37–50Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Takeda K, Sonobe Y, Hashimoto M (1986) Experimental study to estimate the amplitude of vortex-induced vibration (in Japanese). In: Proceedings of the 9th National Symposium on Wind Engineering, Tokyo, pp 265–270Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kawakami Y (1994) The Skygate Bridge (in Japanese). Doboku-Seko 35(10):41–48Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Japanese Society of Steel Construction (1997) Wind resistant engineering of structures (in Japanese). Tokyo Denki University Press, Tokyo, Japan, pp 363–372Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yamada H (1995) Approach to wind resistant engineering, Kensetsu-Tosho, Tokyo (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Japan Society of Civil Engineers (1985) Vibration handbook for civil engineers, JSCE, Tokyo (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bridge and Wind Editorial Group (1994) Bridge and wind, Kyoto (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kobayashi H, Nagaoka H (1992) Active control of flutter of a suspension bridge. J Wind Eng Ind Aerod 41(1–3):143–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wilde K, Omenzetter P, Fujino Y (2001) Suppression of bridge flutter by active deck-flaps control system. J Eng Mech ASCE 127(1):80–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hiejima S (2005) Feedback control of vortex shedding around a bluff body by velocity excitation. Int J Comput Fluid Dynam 19(1):87–92MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Maruyama T et al (1998) Plan and design of Yumeshima-Maishima Bridge (in Japanese). Bridge and Foundation Eng 32(2):15–24Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Okada T, Honke K, Sugii K, Shimada S, Kobayashi H (1998) Suppression of coupled flutter of a bridge deck by tuned pendulum damper. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on structural control (2WCSC) 3:1747–1756Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nakazaki S, Yamaguchi H (1998) Very long suspension bridges using the temporary mass method. IABSE Reports, (IABSE Symposium Kobe 1998) 79:415–420Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nakazaki S, Yamaguchi H (1999) Preliminary design of very long suspension bridges using the temporary additional mass method against a storm. J Wind Eng Ind Aerod 83:317–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Miyata T, Tada K, Katsuchi H (1993) Wind resistant design considerations for the Akashi Kaikyo Bridge. In: Proceedings of the international seminar on utilization of large boundary layer wind tunnel, Tsukuba, pp 79–100Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Honshu-Shikoku Bridge Authority (1998) The Akashi-Kaikyo bridge: design and construction of the world’s longest bridge, HSBA, KobeGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Miyata T, Sato H, Kitagawa M (1993) Design considerations for superstructures of the Akashi Kaikyo bridge. In: Proceedings of the international seminar on utilization of large boundary layer wind tunnel, Tsukuba, pp 121–139Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Honshu Shikoku Bridge Authority (1983) The First construction bureau Kobe: construction of Tozaki bridge -Largest prefabricated block erection of steel box girders were executed successfully, HSBA, Kobe, Japan (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hirai S, Honda A, Kato H, Yoshida O, Okauchi I (1993) Aerodynamic stability of Trans-Tokyo bay highway bridge. J Wind Eng Ind Aerod 49:487–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yoshida Y, Tokita H, Fujino Y, Katsuura K (1997) Excitation test on a box girder bridge with continuous steel deck and multiple spans and its vibration characteristics (in Japanese). J Struct Eng JSCE 43A:725–736Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yoshida Y, Fujino Y, Tokita H, Honda A (1999) Wind tunnel study and field measurement of vortex-induced vibration of a continuous steel box girder in Trans-Tokyo Bay Highway (in Japanese). J Struct Mech Earthquake Eng JSCE 633/I-49:103–117Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yoshida Y, Fujino Y, Satom H, Tokita H, Miura S (1999) Control of vortex-induced vibration of a continuous steel box girder in Trans-Tokyo Bay Highway (in Japanese). J Struct Mech Earthquake Eng JSCE 633/I-49:119–134Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Fujino Y, Yoshida Y (2002) Wind-induced vibration and control of Trans-Tokyo bay crossing bridge. J Struct Eng ASCE 128(8):1012–1025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Larsen A, Esdahl S, Andersen JE, Vejrum T (1999) Vortex shedding excitation of the Great Belt suspension bridge. In: Larsen A, Larose GL, Livesey FM (eds) Wind engineering into the 21st century. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 947–954Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Battista RC, Pfeil MS (2000) Reduction of vortex-induced oscillations of Rio-Niteroi bridge by dynamic control devices. J Wind Eng Ind Aerod 84:273–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Frandsen JB (2001) Simultaneous pressures and accelerations measured full-scale on the Great Belt East suspension bridge. J Wind Eng Ind Aerod 89:95–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringThe University of TokyoBunkyo-kuJapan
  2. 2.Department of Civil Engineering Faculty of Science and TechnologyTokyo University of ScienceShinjukuJapan
  3. 3.University of OttawaOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations