Small Molecule-Induced Proximity

Conference paper


Every cell in a living organism is like a tiny chemical reaction vessel. Although the cell is far smaller in size than a typical chemical reaction flask, the complexity of the reactions is remarkable and highly coordinated. A typical chemical reaction in the laboratory usually has a few well-defined chemical reactants; in contrast, there are millions of different biological molecules coexisting at any moment in a cell. How does the cell control the selectivity of interactions between two or a few biomolecules among the seas of others? To solve this problem, Nature evolved delicate mechanisms to control the proximity between cellular molecules to regulate their interactions. In a laboratory chemical reaction, chemical reactants are often mixed together in micromolar to molar (μM to M) concentrations. Such a high concentration is used to facilitate the chemical reaction. However, under such conditions, the reactive functional moieties in each molecule have to be carefully designed and manipulated to prevent unwanted side reactions. In a cell, however, most of the biological molecules typically exist in nanomolar to micromolar (nM to μM) concentrations. In such a low concentration, the chance of efficient interactions between biomolecules is very low unless assisted by special cellular mechanisms to bring specific biomolecules into proximity to promote their interactions; for example, the dimerization of receptor tyrosine kinases in the presence of extracellular stimuli to trigger intracellular signaling [1], or the synthesis of proteins using mRNA as templates and dedicated cellular machineries to bring correct building blocks in order into proximity to produce proteins with accurate sequences. In fact, many protein domains have evolved to mediate the proximity between different biomolecules. For example, the SH2 domain recognizes the phosphotyrosine residue, the bromo or the PHD domain recognizes acetylated or methylated histone tails, the PAZ domain binds the 3′-overhangs of small interfering (si)RNA, or a DNA-binding domain recognizes a specific DNA sequence. These recognition domains direct individual catalytic or effective domains to specific action locations and regulate downstream cellular processes. Nature uses such proximity control in combination with allostery and other mechanism to regulate complex arrays of biological events [2].


Phosphotyrosine Residue Unwanted Side Reaction Effective Molarity Complementary Surface PP2C Phosphatase 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Lemmon MA, Schlessinger J (2010) Cell signaling by receptor tyrosine kinases. Cell 141:1117–1134CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Austin DJ, Crabtree GR, Schreiber SL (1994) Proximity versus allostery: the role of regulated protein dimerization in biology. Chem Biol 1:131–136CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kolata G (1983) Drug transforms transplant medicine. Science 221:40–42CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Borel JF, Feurer C, Gubler HU, Stähelin H (1976) Biological effects of cyclosporin A: a new antilymphocytic agent. Agents Actions 6:468–475CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sawada S, Suzuki C, Kawase Y, Takaku F (1987) Novel immunosuppressive agent FK506: in vitro effects on cloned T cell activation. J Immunol 139:1797–1803PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Liu J, Farmer JD, Lane WS, Friedman J, Weissman J, Schreiber SL (1991) Calcineurin is a common target of cyclophilin-cyclosporin A and FKBP-FK506 complexes. Cell 66:807–815CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bram RJ, Hung DT, Martin PK, Schreiber SL, Crabtree GR (1993) Identification of the immunophilins capable of mediating inhibition of signal transduction by cyclosporin A and FK506: roles of calcineurin binding and cellular location. Mol Cell Biol 13:4760–4769PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schreiber SL, Crabtree GR (1992) The mechanism of action of cyclosporin A and FK506. Immunol Today 13:136–142CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ho S, Clipstone N, Timmermann L, Northrop J, Graef I, Fiorentino D, Nourse J, Crabtree GR (1996) The mechanism of action of cyclosporin A and FK506. Clin Immunol Immunopathol 80:S40–S45CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Spencer DM, Wandless TJ, Schreiber SL, Crabtree GR (1993) Controlling signal transduction with synthetic ligands. Science 262:1019–1024CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kuo CJ, Chung J, Fiorentino DF, Flanagan WM, Blenis J, Crabtree GR (1992) Rapamycin selectively inhibits interleukin-2 activation of p70 S6 kinase. Nature 358:70–73CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chung J, Kuo CJ, Crabtree GR, Blenis J (1992) Rapamycin-FKBP specifically blocks growth-dependent activation of and signaling by the 70-kd S6 protein kinases. Cell 69:1227–1236CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Guertin DA, Sabatini DM (2009) The pharmacology of mTOR inhibition. Sci Signal 2:pe24CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Farrar MA, Alberola-Ila J, Perlmutter RM (1996) Activation of the Raf-1 kinase cascade by coumermycin-induced dimerization. Nature (Lond) 383:178–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Czlapinski JL, Schelle MW, Miller LW, Laughlin ST, Kohler JJ, Cornish VW, Bertozzi CR (2008) Conditional glycosylation in eukaryotic cells using a biocompatible chemical inducer of dimerization. J Am Chem Soc 130:13186–13187CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Giniger E, Ptashne M (1987) Transcription in yeast activated by a putative amphipathic alpha helix linked to a DNA binding unit. Nature (Lond) 330:670–672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ho SN, Biggar SR, Spencer DM, Schreiber SL, Crabtree GR (1996) Dimeric ligands define a role for transcriptional activation domains in reinitiation. Nature (Lond) 382:822–826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Biggar SR, Crabtree GR (2000) Chemically regulated transcription factors reveal the persistence of repressor-resistant transcription after disrupting activator function. J Biol Chem 275:25381–25390CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kohler JJ, Bertozzi CR (2003) Regulating cell surface glycosylation by small molecule control of enzyme localization. Chem Biol 10:1303–1311CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    de Graffenried CL, Laughlin ST, Kohler JJ, Bertozzi CR (2004) A small-molecule switch for Golgi sulfotransferases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:16715–16720CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gray DC, Mahrus S, Wells JA (2010) Activation of specific apoptotic caspases with an engineered small-molecule-activated protease. Cell 142:637–646CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pratt MR, Schwartz EC, Muir TW (2007) Small-molecule-mediated rescue of protein function by an inducible proteolytic shunt. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:11209–11214CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mootz HD, Muir TW (2002) Protein splicing triggered by a small molecule. J Am Chem Soc 124:9044–9045CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mootz HD, Blum ES, Tyszkiewicz AB, Muir TW (2003) Conditional protein splicing: a new tool to control protein structure and function in vitro and in vivo. J Am Chem Soc 125:10561–10569CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mootz HD, Blum ES, Muir TW (2004) Activation of an autoregulated protein kinase by ­conditional protein splicing. Angew Chem Int Ed 43:5189–5192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pruschy MN, Spencer DM, Kapoor TM, Miyake H, Crabtree GR, Schreiber SL (1994) Mechanistic studies of a signaling pathway activated by the organic dimerizer FK1012. Chem Biol 1:163–172CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Belshaw PJ, Spencer DM, Crabtree GR, Schreiber SL (1996) Controlling programmed cell death with a cyclophilin-cyclosporin-based chemical inducer of dimerization. Chem Biol 3:731–738CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Spencer DM, Belshaw PJ, Chen L, Ho SN, Randazzo F, Crabtree GR, Schreiber SL (1996) Functional analysis of Fas signaling in vivo using synthetic inducers of dimerization. Curr Biol 6:839–847CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Graef IA, Holsinger LJ, Diver S, Schreiber SL, Crabtree GR (1997) Proximity and orientation underlie signaling by the non-receptor tyrosine kinase ZAP70. EMBO J 16:5618–5628CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Gruber S, Arumugam P, Katou Y, Kuglitsch D, Helmhart W, Shirahige K, Nasmyth K (2006) Evidence that loading of cohesin onto chromosomes involves opening of its SMC hinge. Cell 127:523–537CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Karpova AY, Tervo DGR, Gray NW, Svoboda K (2005) Rapid and reversible chemical inactivation of synaptic transmission in genetically targeted neurons. Neuron 48:727–735CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Holsinger LJ, Spencer DM, Austin DJ, Schreiber SL, Crabtree GR (1995) Signal transduction in T lymphocytes using a conditional allele of Sos. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:9810–9814CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Spencer DM, Graef IA, Austin DJ, Schreiber SL, Crabtree GR (1995) A general strategy for producing conditional alleles of Src-like tyrosine kinases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:9805–9809CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Klemm JD, Beals CR, Crabtree GR (1997) Rapid targeting of nuclear proteins to the cytoplasm. Curr Biol 7:638–644CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Stankunas K, Bayle JH, Gestwicki JE, Lin YM, Wandless TJ, Crabtree GR (2003) Conditional protein alleles using knockin mice and a chemical inducer of dimerization. Mol Cell 12:1615–1624CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Liu KJ, Arron JR, Stankunas K, Crabtree GR, Longaker MT (2007) Chemical rescue of cleft palate and midline defects in conditional GSK-3beta mice. Nature (Lond) 446:79–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Gestwicki JE, Crabtree GR, Graef IA (2004) Generate small-molecule inhibitors of amyloid β aggregation. Science 306:865–869CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Briesewitz R, Ray GT, Wandless TJ, Crabtree GR (1999) Affinity modulation of small-molecule ligands by borrowing endogenous protein surfaces. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:1953–1958CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Harding MW, Galat A, Uehling DE, Schreiber SL (1989) A receptor for the immunosuppressant FK506 is a cis-tram peptidyl-prolyl isomerase. Nature (Lond) 341:758–760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Bayle JH, Grimley JS, Stankunas K, Gestwicki JE, Lin YM, Wandless TJ, Crabtree GR (2006) Rapamycin analogs with differential binding specificity permit orthogonal control of protein activity. Chem Biol 13:99–107CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Liberles SD, Diver ST, Austin DJ, Schreiber SL (1997) Inducible gene expression and protein translocation using nontoxic ligands identified by a mammalian three-hybrid screen. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:7825–7830CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Santner A, Estelle M (2009) Recent advances and emerging trends in plant hormone signalling. Nature (Lond) 459:1071–1078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Tan X, Calderon-Villalobos LI, Sharon M, Zheng C, Robinson CV, Estelle M, Zheng N (2007) Mechanism of auxin perception by the TIR1 ubiquitin ligase. Nature (Lond) 446:640–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Murase K, Hirano Y, Sun TP, Hakoshima T (2008) Gibberellin-induced DELLA recognition by the gibberellin receptor GID1. Nature (Lond) 456:459–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Shimada A, Ueguchi-Tanaka M, Nakatsu T, Nakajima M, Naoe Y, Ohmiya H, Kato H, Matsuoka M (2008) Structural basis for gibberellin recognition by its receptor GID1. Nature (Lond) 456:520–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Cutler SR, Rodriguez PL, Finkelstein RR, Abrams SR (2010) Abscisic acid: emergence of a core signaling network. Annu Rev Plant Biol 61:651–679CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Weiner JJ, Peterson FC, Volkman BF, Cutler SR (2010) Structural and functional insights into core ABA signaling. Curr Opin Plant Biol 13:495–502CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Miyazono K, Miyakawa T, Sawano Y, Kubota K, Kang HJ, Asano A, Miyauchi Y, Takahashi M, Zhi Y, Fujita Y, Yoshida T, Kodaira KS, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Tanokura M (2009) Structural basis of abscisic acid signalling. Nature (Lond) 462:609–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Yin P, Fan H, Hao Q, Yuan X, Wu D, Pang Y, Yan C, Li W, Wang J, Yan N (2009) Structural insights into the mechanism of abscisic acid signaling by PYL proteins. Nat Struct Mol Biol 16:1230–1236CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Melcher K, Ng LM, Zhou XE, Soon FF, Xu Y, Suino-Powell KM, Park SY, Weiner JJ, Fujii H, Chinnusamy V, Kovach A, Li J, Wang Y, Li J, Peterson FC, Jensen DR, Yong EL, Volkman BF, Cutler SR, Zhu JK, Xu HE (2009) A gate-latch-lock mechanism for hormone signalling by abscisic acid receptors. Nature (Lond) 462:602–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Liang FS, Ho WQ, Crabtree GR (2011) Engineering the ABA plant stress pathway for regulation of induced proximity. Sci Signal 4:rs2CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Cutler SR (2011) Inducible gene expression in mammals: plants add to the menu. Sci Signal 4:pe13CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Environmental Protection Agency (2010) S-Abscisic Acid, (S)-5-(1-hydroxy-2,6,6-trimethyl-4-oxo-1-cyclohex-2-enyl)-3-methyl-penta-(2Z,4E)-dienoic acid; amendment to an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance. Fed Reg 75:11740–11744Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Guri AJ, Misyak SA, Hontecillas R, Hasty A, Liu D, Si H, Bassaganya-Riera J (2010) Abscisic acid ameliorates atherosclerosis by suppressing macrophage and CD4+T cell recruitment into the aortic wall. J Nutr Biochem 21:1178–1185CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Guri AJ, Hontecillas R, Bassaganya-Riera J (2010) Abscisic acid synergizes with rosiglitazone to improve glucose tolerance and down-modulate macrophage accumulation in adipose tissue: possible action of the cAMP/PKA/PPAR gamma axis. Clin Nutr 29:646–653CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Guri AJ, Hontecillas R, Bassaganya-Riera J (2010) Abscisic acid ameliorates experimental IBD by downregulating cellular adhesion molecule expression and suppressing immune cell infiltration. Clin Nutr 29:824–831CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Guri AJ, Hontecillas R, Si H, Liu D, Bassaganya-Riera J (2007) Dietary abscisic acid ameliorates glucose tolerance and obesity-related inflammation in db/db mice fed high-fat diets. Clin Nutr 26:107–116CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Nguyen M, Huan-Tu G, Gonzalez-Edick M, Rivera VM, Clackson T, Jooss KU, Harding TC (2007) Rapamycin-regulated control of antiangiogenic tumor therapy following rAAV-mediated gene transfer. Mol Ther 15:912–920CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Rivera VM, Gao GP, Grant RL, Schnell MA, Zoltick PW, Rozamus LW, Clackson T, Wilson JM (2005) Long-term pharmacologically regulated expression of erythropoietin in primates following AAV-mediated gene transfer. Blood 105:1424–1430CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Beckman Center B211Stanford University School of MedicineStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations