• Yasushi Takeda
Part of the Fluid Mechanics and Its Applications book series (FMIA, volume 101)


The ultrasonic Doppler velocity profiler (UVP) method is now an accepted and established tool in modern experimental fluid mechanics and fluid engineering. I presented my first set of results illustrating the versatility and power of UVP at the conference in 1985 [Takeda, Velocity profile measurement by ultrasound Doppler shift method. In: Harada M, Pergamon (eds) Fluid control and measurement, FLUCOME TOKYO ’85, Tokyo, 1985, p 851]. The span of almost two decades from introduction to acceptance is remarkably in accord with the remarks made by Leibovich (Annu Rev Fluid Mech 35, 2003) on the time it takes for novel theoretical ideas to gain acceptance in fluid mechanics. In the 1985 conference I presented the results of UVP measurement in several flow configurations and emphasized the importance of this development because it is a line measurement and different from point measurement. In the meeting I recall discussing the future of flow measurement with R.J. Adrian, who admitted that line or areal measurement of flow field is important. [Adrian extended the laser speckle method to a development of PTV/PIV, which is also a key technology of current flow measurements (Exp Fluids 39:159–169, 2005).]

In this review I give a brief history of the development of the ultrasonic Doppler velocity profiler (UVP) and describe several examples of its diversity and use in fluid mechanics and engineering.


Velocity Profile Particle Image Velocimetry Magnetic Fluid Pipe Flow Laser Doppler Anemometry 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Fox TF (1981) A theoretical and experimental investigation of a range-gated ultrasonic Doppler flow detector. J Phys E Sci Instrum 14:330–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Garbini J, Forster FK, Jorgensen JE (1982) Measurement of fluid turbulence based on pulsed ultrasound techniques. Part 1. Analysis. J Fluid Mech 118:445–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Garbini J, Forster FK, Jorgensen JE (1982) Measurement of fluid turbulence based on pulsed ultrasound techniques. Part 2. Experimental investigation. J Fluid Mech 118:471–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Takeda Y (1986) Velocity profile measurement by ultrasound Doppler shift method. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 7(4):313–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Teufel M, Trimis D, Lohmueller A, Takeda Y, Durst F (1992) Determination of velocity profiles in oscillating pipe-flows by using laser Doppler velocimetry and ultrasonic measuring devices. Flow Meas Instrum 3(2):95–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Takeda Y, Kobashi K, Fischer WE (1990) Observation of the transient behavior of Taylor vortex flow between rotating concentric cylinders after sudden start. Exp Fluids 9:317–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Takeda Y, Fischer WE, Kobashi K, Takada T (1992) Spatial characteristics of dynamic properties of modulated wavy vortex flow in a rotating Couette system. Exp Fluids 13:199–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Takeda Y, Fischer WE, Sakakibara J, Ohmura K (1993) Experimental observation of the quasiperiodic modes in a rotating Couette system. Phys Rev E 47:4130–4134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tokuhiro A, Takeda Y (1993) Measurement of flow phenomena using the ultrasonic velocity profile method in a simulated Czochralski crystal puller. J Cryst Growth 130:421–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Takeda Y, Fischer WE, Sakakibara J (1993) Measurement of energy spectral density of a flow in a rotating Couette system. Phys Rev Lett 70:3569–3571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Takeda Y, Fischer WE, Sakakibara J (1994) Decomposition of the modulated waves in a rotating Couette system. Science 263:502–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Aider JL, Wesfried JE (1996) Characterization of longitudinal Göertler vortices in a curved channel using ultrasonic Doppler velocimetry and visualizations. J Phys III Fr 6:893–906CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Le Gal P, Peschard I, Chauve MP, Takeda Y (1996) Collective behavior of wakes downstream a row of cylinders. Phys Fluids 8:2098–2106Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schouveiler L, Le Gal P, Chauve MP, Takeda Y (1999) Spiral and circular waves in the flow between a rotating and a stationary disk. Exp Fluids 26:179–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Peschard I, Le Gal P, Takeda Y (1999) On the spatio-temporal structure of cylinder wakes. Exp Fluids 26:188–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Alfonsi G (2001) Analysis of streamwise velocity fluctuations in turbulent pipe flow with the use of an ultrasonic Doppler flowmeter. Flow Turbulence Combust 67:137–142MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Alfonsi G, Brambilla S, Chiuch D (2003) The use of an ultrasonic Doppler velocimeter in turbulent pipe flow. Exp Fluids 35:553–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Le Guer Y, Reghem P, Petit I, Stutz B (2003) Experimental study of a buoyant particle dispersion in pipe flow. Trans I Chem Eng 81(Part A):1136–1143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mordant N, Metz P, Michel O, Pinton JF (2001) Measurement of Lagrangian velocity in fully developed turbulence. Phys Rev Lett 87:214501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Inoue Y, Yamashita S, Kumada M (1999) An experimental study on a wake behind a torus using the UVP monitor. Exp Fluids 26:197–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ern P, Wesfried JE (2002) Time behavior of the secondary flow between time-periodically corotating cylinders: a two-frequency forcing case. Phys Rev E 65:047301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lusseyran F, Izrar B, Audemar C, Skali-lami S (2003) Time–space characteristics of stratified shear layer from UVP measurements. Exp Fluids 35:32–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Inoue Y, Yamashita S, Kondo K (2002) The ultrasonic velocity profile measurement of flow structure in the near field of a square free jet. Exp Fluids 32:170–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Furuichi N, Takeda Y, Kumada M (2003) Spatial structure of the flow through an axisymmetric sudden expansion. Exp Fluids 34:643–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mashiko T, Tsuji Y, Mizuno T, Sano M (2004) Instantaneous measurement of velocity fields in developed thermal turbulence in mercury. Phys Rev E 69:036306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tsuji Y, Mizuno T, Mashiko T, Sano M (2005) Mean wind in convective turbulence of mercury. Phys Rev Lett 94:034501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Frisch U, Orszag SA (1990) Turbulence: challenges for theory and experiment. Phys Today 43:24–32Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Fowlis WW (1973) Liquid metal flow measurements using an ultrasonic Doppler velocimeter. Nat Phys Sci 242:12–13Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Takeda Y (1987) Measurement of velocity profile of mercury flow by ultrasound Doppler-shift method. Nucl Technol 79:120–124Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kikura H, Takeda Y, Durst F (1999) Velocity profile measurement of the Taylor vortex flow of a magnetic fluid using the ultrasonic Doppler method. Exp Fluids 26:208–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kikura H, Takeda Y, Sawada T (1999) Velocity profile measurements of magnetic fluid flow using ultrasonic Doppler method. J Magn Magn Mater 201:276–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sawada T, Kikura H, Tanahashi T (1999) Kinematic characteristics of magnetic fluid sloshing in a rectangular container. Exp Fluids 26:215–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Brito D, Nataf HC, Carddin P, Aubert J, Masson JP (2001) Ultrasonic Doppler velocimetry in liquid gallium. Exp Fluids 31:653–663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Aubert J, Brito D, Nataf HC, Cardin P, Masson JP (2001) A systematic experimental study of rapidly rotating spherical convection in water and liquid gallium. Phys Earth Planet In 128:51–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Eckert S, Gerbeth G (2002) Velocity measurements in liquid sodium by means of ultrasound Doppler velocimetry. Exp Fluids 32:542–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Cramer A, Eckert S, Galindo V, Gerbeth Gm Willers B, Witke W (2004) Liquid metal model experiments on casting and solidification processes. J Mater Sci 39:7285–7294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Raebiger D, Eckert S, Gerbeth G (2010) Measurements of an unsteady liquid metal flow during spin-up driven by a rotating magnetic field. Exp Fluids 48:233–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Eckert S, Gerbeth G, Melnikov VI (2003) Velocity measurements at high temperatures by ultrasound Doppler velocimetry using an acoustic wave guide. Exp Fluids 35:381–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Zhang C, Eckert S, Gerbeth G (2005) Experimental study of single bubble motion in a liquid metal column exposed to a DC magnetic field. Int J Multiphase Flow 31:824–842MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Zhang C, Eckert S, Gerbeth G (2007) The flow structure of a bubble-driven liquid-metal jet in a horizontal magnetic field. J Fluid Mech 575:57–82MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Yanagisawa T, Yamagishi Y, Hamano Y, Tasaka Y, Yoshida M, Yano K, Takeda Y (2010) Structure of large-scale flows and their oscillation in the thermal convection of liquid gallium. Phys Rev E 82:016320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Yanagisawa T, Yamagishi Y, Hamano Y, Tasaka Y, Yano K, Takahashi J, Takeda Y (2010) Detailed investigation of thermal convection in a liquid metal under a horizontal magnetic field: suppression of oscillatory flow observed by velocity profiles. Phys Rev E 82:56306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Yanagisawa T, Yamagishi Y, Hamano Y, Tasaka Y, Takeda Y (2011) Spontaneous flow reversals in Rayleigh-Bénard convection of a liquid metal. Phys Rev E 83:036307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Brawn B, Joshi K, Lathrop DP, Mujica N, Sisan DR (2005) Visualizing the invisible: ultrasound velocimetry in liquid sodium. Chaos 15:041104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Chaves A, Rinaldi C, Elborai S, He X, Zahn M (2006) Bulk flow in ferrofluids in a uniform rotating magnetic field. Phys Rev Lett 96:194501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Ouriev NB (2002) Investigation of the wall slip effect in highly concentrated disperse systems by means of non-invasive UVP-PD method in the pressure-driven shear flow. Colloid J 64:740–745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Ouriev B, Windhab E (2003) Novel ultrasound based time averaged flow mapping method for die entry visualization in flow of highly concentrated shear-thinning and shear-thickening suspensions. Meas Sci Technol 14:140–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Ouriev B, Windhab E (2003) Transient flow of highly concentrated suspensions investigated using the ultrasound velocity profiler–pressure difference method. Meas Sci Technol 14:1963–1972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Bergstrom J, Vomhoff H (2004) Velocity measurements in a cylindrical hydrocyclone operated with an opaque fiber suspension. Miner Eng 17:599–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Xu H, Aidun CK (2005) Characteristics of fiber suspension flow in a rectangular channel. Int J Multiphase Flow 31:318–336MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Wang T, Wang J, Zhao B, Ren F, Jun Y (2004) Local hydrodynamics in an external loop airlift slurry reactor with and without a resistance-regulating element. Chem Eng Commun 191:1024–1042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    O’Donoghue T, Wright S (2004) Flow tunnel measurements of velocities and sand flux in oscillatory sheet flow for well-sorted and graded sands. Coastal Eng 51:1163–1184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Taishi T, Kikura H, Aritomi M (2002) Effect of control volume of UVP method on the turbulent pipe flow measurement. Exp Fluids 32:188–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Wada S, Kikura H, Aritomi M, Mori M, Takeda Y (2004) Development of pulsed ultrasonic Doppler method for flow rate measurement in power plant; multilines flow rate measurement on metal pipe. J Nucl Sci Technol 41:339–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Bud R, Warner DJ (1998) Instruments of science: an historical encyclopedia. Science Museum, London, p 245Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Mori M, Takeda Y, Taishi T, Furuichi N, Aritomi M, Kikura H (2002) Development of a novel flow metering system using ultrasonic velocity profile measurement. Exp Fluids 32:153–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Mori M (2006) Calibration tests of new type flow metering system by ultrasonic pulse Doppler velocimetry at national standards loops. In: ICONE 14, Miami, 17–20 July 2006Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Yao H (2004) Advanced hybrid type ultrasonic flow meter utilizing state-of-the-art pulsed Doppler method along with traditional transit time method. In: Proceedings ISUD 4, Sapporo, Japan, 6–8 September 2004Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Gonzalez SR, Murai Y, Takeda Y (2009) Ultrasound-based gas–liquid interface detection in gas–liquid two-phase flows. In: Li J (ed) Advances in chemical engineering, vol 23. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Murai Y, Tasaka Y, Nambu Y, Takeda Y, Gonzalez SR (2010) Ultrasonic detection of moving interfaces in gas–liquid two-phase flow. Flow Meas Inst 21:356–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Abda F, Azbaid A, Ensminger D, Fischer S, Francois P, Schmitt P, Pallares A (2009) Ultrasonic device for real-time sewage velocity and suspended particles concentration measurements. Water Sci Technol 60:117–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Yokoyama K, Kashiwaguma N, Okubo T, Takeda Y (2004) Flow measurement in an open channel by UVP. In: Proceedings, ISUD 4, Sapporo, Japan, 6–8 September 2004Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Tasaka Y, Takeda Y, Yokoyama Y, Kojima S (2007) Environmental flow field measurement by ultrasonic velocity profiling. In: Proceedings of the 5th joint ASME/JSME fluids engineering conference, 15th forum on industrial and environmental application of fluid mechanics, FEDSM2007-37071Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Tanner RI (2000) Engineering rheology, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Mueller M, Wunderlich T (1997) New rheometric technique: the gradient-ultrasound pulse Doppler method. Appl Rheol 7(5):204–210Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Wunderlich T, Brunn PO (1999) Ultrasound pulse Doppler method as a viscometer for process monitoring. Flow Meas Instrum 10:201–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Wunderlich T, Brunn PO (2000) A wall layer correction for ultrasound measurement in tube flow: comparison between theory and experiment. Flow Meas Instrum 11:63–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Wiklund J, Johansson M, Shaik J, Fischer P, Stading M, Hermanson AM (2001) In-line rheological measurement of complex model fluids using ultrasound UVP-PD based method. Ann Trans Nordic Rheol Soc 8(9):128–130Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Corvisier P, Nouar C, Devienne R, Lebouche M (2001) Development of a thixotropic fluid flow in a pipe. Exp Fluids 31:579–587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Dogan H, McCarthy MJ, Powell RL (2002) Comparison of in-line consistency measurement of tomato concentrates using ultrasonic and capillary methods. J Food Process Eng 25:571–587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Dogan H, McCarthy MJ, Powell RL (2005) Measurement of polymer melt rheology using ultrasonic-based in-line rheometry. Meas Sci Technol 16:1684–1690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Hou YY, Kassim HO (2005) Instrument techniques for rheometry. Rev Sci Instrum 76:101101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Brunn PO, Wunderlich T, Mueller M (2004) Ultrasonic rheological studies of a body lotion. Flow Meas Instrum 15:139–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Bachelet C, Dantan P, Flaud P (2003) Indirect on-line determination of Newtonian fluid viscosity based on numerical flow simulations. Eur Phys J Appl Phys 21:67–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Bachelet C, Dantan P, Flaud P (2004) Indirect on-line determination of rheological behavior of a power law fluid based on numerical flow simulations. Eur Phys J Appl Phys 25:209–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Basaran T, McClements DJ (1999) Nondestructive monitoring of sucrose diffusion in oil-in-water emulsions by ultrasonic velocity profiling. J Colloid Interface Sci 220:429–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Ein-Mozaffari F, Bennington CPJ, Dumont GA, Buckingham D (2007) Measuring flow velocity in pulp suspension mixing using ultrasonic Doppler velocimetry. Chem Eng Res Design Trans I Chem Eng Part A 85:591–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Ein-Mozaffari F, Upreti SR (2009) Using ultrasonic Doppler velocimetry and CFD modeling to investigate the mixing of non-Newtonian fluids possessing yield stress. Chem Eng Res Design 87:515–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Pakzad L, Ein-Mozaffari F, Chan P (2008) Using computational fluid dynamics modeling to study the mixing of pseudoplastic fluids with a Scaba 6SRGT impeller. Chem Eng Processing 47:2219–2227Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Young NWG, Wassell P, Wiklund J, Stading M (2008) Monitoring struturants of fat blends with ultrasound based in-line rheometry. Intl J Food Sci Technol 43:2083–2089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Wassell P, Wiklund J, Stading M, Bonwick G, Smith C, Almiron-Roig E, Young NWG (2010) Ultrasound Doppler based in-line viscosity and solid fat profile measurement of fat blends. Int J Food Sci Technol 45:877–883CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Wiklund J, Stading M, Tragardh C (2010) Monitoring liquid displacement of model and industrial fluids in pipes by in-line ultrasonic rheometry. J Food Eng 99:330–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Hokkaido UniversitySapporoJapan
  2. 2.Tokyo Institute of TechnologyTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations