Skip to main content

Linear EUS of the Anorectum

  • Chapter
  • 1584 Accesses

Abstract

The utility of endorectal and endoanal ultrasound has evolved in the last few years [1]. Both radial and linear EUS are used for evaluation of anorectal diseases. Radial EUS is preferred for examination of anal canal whereas linear is preferred for rectal and para rectal examination and to perform interventions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brugge WR (1998) Endoscopic ultrasonography: the current status. Gastroenterology 115(6):1577–1583. doi:S0016508598006222 [pii]

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Akahoshi K, Kondoh A, Nagaie T et al (2000) Preoperative staging of rectal cancer using a 7.5 MHz front-loading US probe. Gastrointest Endosc 52(4):529–534. doi:doi:S0016510700116700 [pii]

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Akasu T, Sugihara K, Moriya Y et al (1997) Limitations and pitfalls of transrectal ultrasonography for staging of rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 40(10 Suppl):S10–S15

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sailer M, Leppert R, Bussen D et al (1997) Influence of tumor position on accuracy of endorectal ultrasound staging. Dis Colon Rectum 40(10):1180–1186

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kwok H, Bissett IP, Hill GL (2000) Preoperative staging of rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 15(1):9–20

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sailer M, Allgayer H, Dietrich CF (2006) Endoanal and endorectal sonography. In: Dietrich CF (ed) Endoscopic ultrasound an introductory manual and atlas, vol 1, 1st edn. Thieme, Stuttgart, pp 291–312

    Google Scholar 

  7. Giovannini M (1995) Endoscopic ultrasonography with a curved array transducer: normal echoanatomy of retroperitoneum. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 5(3):523–528

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Harewood GC, Wiersema MJ, Nelson H et al (2002) A prospective, blinded assessment of the impact of preoperative staging on the management of rectal cancer. Gastroenterology 123(1):24–32. doi:S0016508502000604 [pii]

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Harewood GC, Wiersema MJ (2002) Cost-effectiveness of endoscopic ultrasonography in the evaluation of proximal rectal cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 97(4):874–882. doi:10.1111/ j.1572-0241.2002.05603.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amol Bapaye M.D. (M.S.) .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bapaye, A., Aher, A. (2012). Linear EUS of the Anorectum. In: Akahoshi, K., Bapaye, A. (eds) Practical Handbook of Endoscopic Ultrasonography. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54014-4_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54014-4_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo

  • Print ISBN: 978-4-431-54013-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-4-431-54014-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics