Island Futures pp 107-123 | Cite as

Environmental Attitudes and Behaviors Among Jeju Islanders, South Korea

Part of the Global Environmental Studies book series (GENVST)


Industrialization has brought about material and cultural affluence and many of the conveniences modern societies now enjoy. Such benefits have been achieved at the expense of the environment, however, resulting in worldwide environmental problems that may even threaten the very existence of human beings.


Monthly Income Civic Engagement Environmental Behavior Question Item Ecological Modernization 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Abramson P, Inglehart R (1995) Value change in global perspective. University of Michigan Press, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
  2. Bauman Z (1998) Work, consumerism, and the new poor. Open University Press, BuckinghamGoogle Scholar
  3. Beck U (1992) Risk society. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. Bennett T, Emmison M, Frow J (1999) Accounting for taste. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  5. Buttel F (1978) Economic growth and the welfare state: implications for the future of environmentalism. Soc Sci Quart 58:692–699Google Scholar
  6. Catton WR Jr, Dunlap RE (1978) Environmental sociology: a new paradigm. Am Sociol 13(1):41–49Google Scholar
  7. Chan RYK, Yam E (1995) Green movement in a newly industrializing area: a Survey on the attitudes and behavior of the Hong Kong citizens. J Community Appl Soc Psychol 5(4):273–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chang SO (2004) Environmental concern among Australians and Koreans: a multi-faceted approach. PhD thesis, The University of Queensland, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  9. Cotgrove S, Duff A (1980) Environmentalism, middle-class radicalism, and politics. Sociol Rev 28:333–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dove MR (2008) New environmentalism. Harvard Int Rev 30(1):1–7Google Scholar
  11. Dunlap RE, Van Liere K (1978) The new environmental paradigm: a proposed measuring instrument and preliminary results. J Environ Educ 9:10–19Google Scholar
  12. Dunlap RE, Van Liere K (1984) Commitment to the dominant social paradigm and concerns for environmental quality: an empirical examination. Soc Sci Quart 65:1013–1028Google Scholar
  13. Dunlap RE, Van Liere K, Mertig A, Jones R (2000) Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: a revised NEP scale. J Soc Issues 56(3):425–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eckersley R (1989) Green politics and the new class. Polit Stud 37:205–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ekins P (1994) The environmental sustainability of economic processes: a framework for analysis. In: van den Bergh JCJM, van der Straaten J (eds) Toward sustainable development: concepts, methods, and policy. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 25–55Google Scholar
  16. Fine B, Leopold E (1993) The world of consumption. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. Gibbs D (2000) Ecological modernization, regional economic development and regional development agencies. Geoforum 31:9–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Giddens A (1991) Modernity and self-identify. Polity, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  19. Goodwin N, Ackerman F, Kiron D (1997) The consumer society. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  20. Harper CL (2007) Environment and society: human perspectives on environmental issues. Pearson, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJGoogle Scholar
  21. Hills P, Welford R, Roberts P (2003) Ecological modernization, environmental reform and the transformation of production and consumption. Int J Environ Sust Dev 2(3):231–236Google Scholar
  22. Howes D (ed) (1996) Cross-cultural consumption. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. Jeong DY (2002) Hwangyeong Sahoehack (Environmental Sociology). Acarnet, SeoulGoogle Scholar
  24. Jeong DY (2004) Sahoetonggaehack (Social Statistical Techniques). Cheju National University Press, JejuGoogle Scholar
  25. Kanji M, Nevitte N (1997) Environmental support, concern and action. Int J Public Opin Res 9(1):66–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lafferty W, Meadowcroft J (eds) (2001) Implementing sustainable development: strategies and initiatives in high consumption societies. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  27. Lash S, Szerszyski B, Wynne B (eds) (1996) Risk, environment, and modernity. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  28. Lyon D (1999) Postmodernity. Open University Press, BuckinghamGoogle Scholar
  29. Merz MA, He Y, Alden DL (2008) A categorization approach to analyzing the global consumer culture debate. Int Market Rev 25(2):166–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Miles S (1998) Consumerism as a way of life. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  31. Miller D (ed) (1995) Acknowledging consumption. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  32. Mol APJ, Sonnenfeld DA (eds) (2000) Ecological modernisation around the world. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  33. Mullins P, Jeong DY, Western JS, Simpson R (2004) Consumerism and sustainable development. Korean Soc Sci J 31(1):1–38Google Scholar
  34. Papadakis E (1993) Politics and the environment: the Australian experience. Allen and Unwin, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  35. Pierce JC et al (1987) Environmental belief systems among Japanese and American elites and Publics. Polit Behav 9:139–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ritzer G (1999) Enchanting a disenchanted world: revolutionizing the means of consumption. Pine Forge, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  37. Rummel RJ (1979) Applied factor analysis, 4th edn. Northwestern University Press, EvanstonGoogle Scholar
  38. Schultz WP, Zelezny LC (1998) Values and proenvironmental behavior: a five-country survey. J Cross Cult Psychol 29:540–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Scott D, Willits F (1994) Environmental attitudes and behavior. Environ Behav 26:239–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sklair L (1991) Sociology of the global system. Harvester Wheatsheaf, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  41. Skogen K (1999) Another look at culture and nature. Acta Sociol 42:223–239Google Scholar
  42. Spaargaren G, Van Vliet B (2000) Lifestyles, consumption and the environment: the ecological modernisation of domestic consumption. Environ Polit 9:50–76Google Scholar
  43. Tilikidou I, Delistavrou A (2008) Types and influential factors of consumers’ non-purchasing ecological behaviors. Bus Strat Environ 17(1):61–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tranter B (1999) Environmentalism in Australia: elites and the public. J Sociol 35:321–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Turner RK (1998) Household metabolism and sustainability: some introductory remarks. In: Noorman KJ, Uiterkamp TS (eds) Green households: domestic consumers, environment and sustainability. London: Earthscan Publications Ltd, pp 1–6Google Scholar
  46. Wall G (1995) Barriers to individual environmental action: the influence of attitudes and social experiences. Can Rev Soc Anthrop 32:465–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Woodrum E, Wolkomir M (1997) Religious effects of environmentalism. Sociol Spectr 17:223–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED) (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Cheju National UniversityChejuSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations