Summary
“Resource” is a central concept that connects nature and the human use of nature. Identification of resource has the power to delimit what is useful from what is not in our surrounding nature. It is also an extremely relevant concept in thinking about the balance between environmental conservation and economic development. The definition of what constitutes a resource and the distribution of control over it has significant implication for sustainable development. “Development,” after all, can be interpreted as the process of identifying and allocating resource control, as well as processing material and nonmaterial resources into useful products and human services. The management of nature has been the key to rapid economic growth in Asia, and this was successfully achieved by the top-down simplification of nature: extracting useful material and transforming nature into resources from the point of view of the state. Interests in resource control have gone beyond nature per se and extended its reach over the control of people living with the resources, such as the minority hill people in the forests. Simplification of a resource, therefore, often entails extraction of resource from the weak to the more powerful. This chapter argues that state simplification creates disparity between those who control the resources and those who live with them in a specific locale. Understanding this divergence is crucial for responding to certain environmental questions, such as why it often takes so much time for the state to take an initiative in remedying problems that had long been identified by scholars and local people. Reversing the direction of simplification is a formidable task, despite various attempts by the governments to decentralize their resource management system. Rather than holding on to the conventional framework of “centralized versus decentralized,” the chapter draws attention to the political implication of “slowing down” the policy speed as an alternative entry point for reforming resource governance.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Blaikie P (1985) The political economy of soil erosion in developing countries. Longman, Harlow, Essex.
Bruun O, Kalland A (eds) (1995) Asian perceptions of nature: a critical approach. Curzon Press,Richmond.
Dove M (1993) The revisionist view of tropical deforestation and development. Environ Conserv 20(1): 17–24.
Duraiappah A (1998) Poverty and environmental degradation: a review and analysis of the nexus. World Dev 26(12):2169–2179.
Fairhead J, Leach M (1996) Misreading the African landscape. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Ganjanapan A (2000) Local control of land and forest: cultural dimensions of resource management in Northern Thailand. RCSD Monograph Series No 1. Faculty of Social Sciences, Chiang Mai University.
Johnson G, Forsyth T (2002) In the eyes of the state: negotiating a “rights-based approach” to forest conservation in Thailand. World Dev 30(9): 1589–1603.
Li TM (2002) Engaging simplifications: community-based resource management market processes and state agendas in upland Southeast Asia. World Dev 30(2):265–283.
Sasagawa K (1917) Fugen Hozon Ron [Theory of resource conservation] (in Japa-nese).Meiseikan Shoten, Tokyo.
Sato J (2000) People in between: conversion and conservation of forest lands in Thailand. Dev Change 31(1): 155–177.
Sato J (2003) Public land for the people: institutional basis of community forestry in Thailand. J Southeast Asian Stud 34(2): 329–346.
Scott J (1998) Seeing like a state: how certain schemes to improve people’s lives often fail. Yale University Press, New Haven.
Van Hise C (1910) The conservation of natural resources (translation). Macmillan, New York.
Watsuji T (1961) A climate: a philosophical study translated by Geoffrey Bownas. Ministry of Education, Tokyo (originally published as FÜDO in Japanese).
World Bank (1992) World development report. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer Japan
About this paper
Cite this paper
Sato, J. (2004). From “Natural Wealth” to “Resources”: Simplification of Nature in Asia. In: Sasaki, T. (eds) Nature and Human Communities. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-53967-4_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-53967-4_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo
Print ISBN: 978-4-431-67970-7
Online ISBN: 978-4-431-53967-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive