Skip to main content

From “Natural Wealth” to “Resources”: Simplification of Nature in Asia

  • Conference paper
  • 150 Accesses

Summary

“Resource” is a central concept that connects nature and the human use of nature. Identification of resource has the power to delimit what is useful from what is not in our surrounding nature. It is also an extremely relevant concept in thinking about the balance between environmental conservation and economic development. The definition of what constitutes a resource and the distribution of control over it has significant implication for sustainable development. “Development,” after all, can be interpreted as the process of identifying and allocating resource control, as well as processing material and nonmaterial resources into useful products and human services. The management of nature has been the key to rapid economic growth in Asia, and this was successfully achieved by the top-down simplification of nature: extracting useful material and transforming nature into resources from the point of view of the state. Interests in resource control have gone beyond nature per se and extended its reach over the control of people living with the resources, such as the minority hill people in the forests. Simplification of a resource, therefore, often entails extraction of resource from the weak to the more powerful. This chapter argues that state simplification creates disparity between those who control the resources and those who live with them in a specific locale. Understanding this divergence is crucial for responding to certain environmental questions, such as why it often takes so much time for the state to take an initiative in remedying problems that had long been identified by scholars and local people. Reversing the direction of simplification is a formidable task, despite various attempts by the governments to decentralize their resource management system. Rather than holding on to the conventional framework of “centralized versus decentralized,” the chapter draws attention to the political implication of “slowing down” the policy speed as an alternative entry point for reforming resource governance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Blaikie P (1985) The political economy of soil erosion in developing countries. Longman, Harlow, Essex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruun O, Kalland A (eds) (1995) Asian perceptions of nature: a critical approach. Curzon Press,Richmond.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dove M (1993) The revisionist view of tropical deforestation and development. Environ Conserv 20(1): 17–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duraiappah A (1998) Poverty and environmental degradation: a review and analysis of the nexus. World Dev 26(12):2169–2179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairhead J, Leach M (1996) Misreading the African landscape. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ganjanapan A (2000) Local control of land and forest: cultural dimensions of resource management in Northern Thailand. RCSD Monograph Series No 1. Faculty of Social Sciences, Chiang Mai University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson G, Forsyth T (2002) In the eyes of the state: negotiating a “rights-based approach” to forest conservation in Thailand. World Dev 30(9): 1589–1603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li TM (2002) Engaging simplifications: community-based resource management market processes and state agendas in upland Southeast Asia. World Dev 30(2):265–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sasagawa K (1917) Fugen Hozon Ron [Theory of resource conservation] (in Japa-nese).Meiseikan Shoten, Tokyo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sato J (2000) People in between: conversion and conservation of forest lands in Thailand. Dev Change 31(1): 155–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sato J (2003) Public land for the people: institutional basis of community forestry in Thailand. J Southeast Asian Stud 34(2): 329–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott J (1998) Seeing like a state: how certain schemes to improve people’s lives often fail. Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Hise C (1910) The conservation of natural resources (translation). Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watsuji T (1961) A climate: a philosophical study translated by Geoffrey Bownas. Ministry of Education, Tokyo (originally published as FÜDO in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (1992) World development report. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer Japan

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sato, J. (2004). From “Natural Wealth” to “Resources”: Simplification of Nature in Asia. In: Sasaki, T. (eds) Nature and Human Communities. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-53967-4_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-53967-4_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo

  • Print ISBN: 978-4-431-67970-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-4-431-53967-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics