Social Restructuring in East Asia after the Crisis: A Bottom-Up Style or a Top-Down Style

  • Akira Suehiro
Conference paper


When a currency and financial crisis attacked the Asian economy, international financial institutions such as IMF and the World Bank frequently attributed the major causes of this crisis to the structural weakness and institutional vulnerability accruing to Asian economic structure as well as the Asian way. These weaknesses, they claimed, include underdevelopment of the stock market, poor governance in the corporate sector, crony capitalism characterizing government and business relations, and government intervention in economic fields (World Bank 1998: Pem-pel 1999). According to such observations, IMF and the World Bank strongly recommended the government of crisis-hit countries to firmly introduce a set of institutional reforms on the basis of Anglo-American model (World Bank 1999; Suehiro 2000a: Chapter 4). As a result, the government started financial restructuring, focusing on the development of direct finance (stock market), corporate restructuring on the basis of a “good corporate governance” concept, and the restructuring of the public sector, including privatization of state enterprises. More broadly speaking, institutional reforms were designed to make the Asian economy adjust to the three different permanent movements of globalization, economic liberalization, and political democratization.


Corporate Governance Minority Shareholder Local Firm Institutional Reform Economic Liberalization 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anek N (2002) Kop Ban Kun Muang duai Phalang Phaendin (Protect a home, save a country, and country’s force; in Thai). Government Saving Bank, Bangkok.Google Scholar
  2. Edwards S (1995) Crisis and reform in Latin America: from despair to hope. World Bank Report. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Ferraz JC (2002) Economic Liberalization, ownership change, and inward internationalization in Latin America. Paper submitted to an international workshop on Managing Development and Transition at the Institute of Social Science, University of Tokyo, July 24–25.Google Scholar
  4. Haggard S (2000) The political economy of the Asian financial crisis. Institute of International Economics, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  5. Hirakawa H (1992) NIES: Sekai Sisutemu to Kaihatsu (NIES: the world system and development; in Japanese). Dobunkan Shuppan, Tokyo.Google Scholar
  6. Hoshino T (ed) (2002) Kaihatsu Tojyokoku no Kigyo to Gurobaraizeshon (Corporations and global economy in developing countries; in Japanese). Institute of Developing Economies, Chiba.Google Scholar
  7. Hosono A (1994) Higashi Ajia no Keizai Hatten to Ratenamerika (Economic development in East Asia and Latin America; in Japanese). Kaigai Tousi Kenkyushoho, vol 20, no 5. Japan Bank for Export and Import, Tokyo.Google Scholar
  8. Hosono A, Tsunekawa K (1986) Ratenamerika Kiki no Kouzu: Ruiseki Saimu to Minshuka no yukue (Structure of the crisis in Latin America: prospects for accumulated debt problems and democratization; in Japanese). Yuhikaku, Tokyo.Google Scholar
  9. IMF (1999) IMF’s response to the Asian crisis, http://www.imf.or.Google Scholar
  10. Kamimura Y (2001) Ajia shokoku no shakai seisaku: ronten to kenkyukadai (Social polcies in Asian countries: issues and research objectives; in Japanese). In: Suehiro A, Ko-morida A (eds) Liberalization, economic crisis and social restructuring in Asia, Latin America and Russia/Eastern Europe. Part I. New perspective on critical issues. ISS Research Series No 1. Institute of Social Science of University of Tokyo, Tokyo, pp.8999.Google Scholar
  11. Koike Y, Horisaka K (eds) (1999) Raten Amerika Sin-seisan-shisutemu-ron: Posuto-yunyuu-daitai-kogyoka no Chosen (New production system in Latin America: an alternative to import substitution model; in Japanese). Institute of Developing Economies, Chiba.Google Scholar
  12. Koike Y, Nishijima S (eds) (1997) Shijyo to Seifu: Raten Amerika no Aratana Kaihatsu Wakugumi (Market and state: a new framework for development in Latin America; in Japanese). Institute of Developing Economies, Chiba.Google Scholar
  13. Lian D (2001) First step in dismantling the East Asia economic model. Asia/Pacific Economics (Stanley Morgan Dean Witter), May 16.Google Scholar
  14. Nabi I, Shivakumar J (2001) Back from the brink: Thailand’s response to the 1997 economic crisis. The World Bank Office, Bangkok.Google Scholar
  15. Nagai F (2003) Tai no chihojichiseido kaikaku (Reform of local authorities in Thailand; in Japanese). In: Sakumoto N, Imaizumi S. (eds) Ajia no minshuka-katei to ho (Democratization and law in Asia). Institute of Developing Economics, Chiba.Google Scholar
  16. Pempel TJ (ed) (1999) The politics of Asian economic crisis. Cornell University Press, Ithaca.Google Scholar
  17. Prawet Wasi M (1999) Setthakit Phophiang lae Prachasangkhom (Sufficient economy and civil society; in Thai). Samnakphim, Bangkok.Google Scholar
  18. Prime Minister Office, Government of Thailand (2002) Summary report on the Thaksin government for the year of 2001 (in Thai). Prime Minister Office, Bangkok.Google Scholar
  19. Suehiro A (ed) (1998) Tai: Keizai Bumu, Keizai Kiki, Kozochosei (Thailand: economic boom, economic crisis and structural adjustments; in Japanese). Nihon Thai Kyokai, Tokyo.Google Scholar
  20. Suehiro A (2000a) Kyatcchiappugata Kougyouka-ron: Ajia Keizai no Kiseki to Tenbo (Catch-up industrialization: the trajectory and prospects of Asian economies; in Japanese). Nagoya University Press, Japan.Google Scholar
  21. Suehiro A (2000b) Tai no Keizai Kaikaku: Sangyo Kozou Kaizen Jigyo to Chushokigyo Shien (Economic reforms in Thailand: industrial restructuring plan and assistance to the SMEs; in Japanese). Shakai Kagaku Kenkyu, vol 51, no 4. Institute of Social Science, University of Tokyo.Google Scholar
  22. Suehiro A (2001a) Family business goes wrong: ownership pattern and corporate performance in Thailand. Asian Development Bank Institute Working Paper 19. ADB Institute, Tokyo.Google Scholar
  23. Suehiro A (2001b) Nihon no Aratana Ajia Kanyo: Chiteki Shien wa Kanouka? (Japan’s new commitment to Asia: is an intellectual cooperation for economic policies possible or not?; in Japanese). In: Suehiro A, Yamakage S (eds) Ajia Seiji Keizai-ron: Ajia no nakano Nihon wo mezasite (The political economy of Asia: in search of Japan in the Asian region). NTT Shuppan, Tokyo.Google Scholar
  24. Suehiro A (ed) (2002) Tai no Seido Kaikaku to Kigyo no Saihen (Institutional reforms and corporate restructuring in Thailand). IDE, Tokyo.Google Scholar
  25. Suehiro A, Higashi S (eds) (2000) Tai no Keizai Seisaku: Seido, Soshiki, Akuta (Economic policy in Thailand: the role of institutions and actors; in Japanese). Institute of Developing Economies, Tokyo.Google Scholar
  26. Usami K (ed) (2001) Raten-amerika Fukushi Kokka-ron Kenkyu Jostsu (An introductory study of social welfare state in Latin America; in Japanese). Institute of Developing Economies, Tokyo.Google Scholar
  27. Williamson J (1994) The political economy of policy reform. Institute of International Economics, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  28. Woo WT, Sachs J, Schwab K (2000) The Asian financial crisis: lessons for a resilient Asia. MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  29. World Bank (1998) East Asia: the road to recovery. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  30. World Bank (1999) East Asia: recovery and beyond. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Akira Suehiro
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Social ScienceThe University of TokyoTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations