Groundwater Investigation

  • Kuniaki Sato
  • Yoshiaki Iwasa


Groundwater investigation can be generally divided into two types: investigation of water quantity and water quality; nevertheless, investigation priorities depend on project requirements and objectives. Investigation techniques, in-situ tests for determining hydraulic coefficients, and groundwater quality are discussed in this chapter. The first half of the chapter outlines the performances and details of groundwater investigation and gives typical examples. Such information will help readers to understand groundwater investigation processes and priorities.

For quantitative groundwater study, it is essential to measure not only groundwater levelfhydraulic head but also the hydraulic parameters of an aquifer, such as conductivity. The viability of groundwater sources and exploitation methods depend on the water quality. Therefore, investigation of groundwater quality and result assessment and interpretation are very important in deciding management policy. The latter half of this chapter describes basic measurement methods for hydraulic quantities and groundwater quality.

Groundwater is regarded as contaminated if it contains substances harmful to human health and the biological environment. The characteristics of soil and groundwater contamination and some technical approaches are also discussed in this chapter.


Water Quality Groundwater Quality Hydraulic Head Observation Well Unconfined Aquifer 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Cooper HH, Jacob CE (1946) A generalized graphical method for evaluating formation con-stants and summarizing well field history. Trans Am Geophys Union 27: 526–534Google Scholar
  2. Creager WP, Justin JD, Hinds J (1945) Engineering for dams Vol III, earth, rock-fill, steel and timber dams. Wiley, New York, pp 648–649Google Scholar
  3. Dawson KJ, Istok JD (1991) Aquifer testing design and analysis of pumping and slug tests. Lewis, Boca Raton, Florida, pp 257–276Google Scholar
  4. Hantush MS, Jacob CE (1955) Non-steady radial flow in an infinite leaky aquifer. Trans Am Geophys Union 36: 95–100MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. Hantush MS (1956) Analysis of data from pumping tests in leaky aquifers. Trans Am Geophys Union 37: 702–714Google Scholar
  6. Hantush MS (1964) Hydraulics of wells. In: VT Chow (editor). Advances in hydroscience, Academic, New York, 1: pp 281–432Google Scholar
  7. Lugeon M (1932) Barrages et g¨¦ologie. imprim¨¦ par poligrafico pedrazzini, locarno, Suisse Montreux (1979), pp 7–136Google Scholar
  8. Marino MA, Luthin JN (1982) Seepage and groundwater. Elsevier, Amsterdam-Oxford-New York, p 301Google Scholar
  9. Morel FMM (1983) Principles of aquatic chemistry. Wiley, New York, pp 151–155Google Scholar
  10. Neuman SP (1972) Theory of flow in unconfined aquifers considering delayed response of the water table. Water Resource Res 8: 1031–1045MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Neuman SP. (1973a) Calibration of distributed parameter groundwater flow models viewed as a multiple-objective decision process under uncertainty. Water Resource Res 9: 1006–1021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Neuman SP (1973b) Supplementary comments on theory of flow in unconfined aquifers con-sidering delayed response of the water table. Water Resource Res 9: 1102–1103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Neuman SP (1975) Analysis of pumping test data from anisotropic unconfined aquifers con-sidering delayed gravity response. Water Resource Res 11: 329–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Stiff HA (1951) The interpretation of chemical water analyses by means of patterns. J Petrol Tech 3(10): 15–17Google Scholar
  15. Theis CV (1935) The relation between the lowering of the piezometric surface and the rate and duration of discharge of a well using groundwater storage. Trans Am Geophys Union 16: 519–524Google Scholar
  16. Thiem G (1906) Hydrogische methoden. Gebhardt Leipzig, p 56Google Scholar
  17. Walton WC (1962) Selected analytical methods for well and aquifer evaluation. Illinois State Water Survey Bulletin, Urbana, No 49, p 81Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kuniaki Sato
    • 1
  • Yoshiaki Iwasa
    • 2
  1. 1.Geosphere Research InstituteSaitama UniversitySaitamaJapan
  2. 2.Institute of Earth Science and TechnologyOsakaJapan

Personalised recommendations