Advertisement

The Difference in Brain Injury Mechanism in Experimental Laboratory Models and Human Patients

  • Nariyuki Hayashi
  • Dalton W. Dietrich

Abstract

The clinical treatment of brain-injured patients has been previously based on information derived from experimental animal studies concerning brain trauma, ischemia, infarction, hypoxia, and cardiac arrest [9]. However, the differences between species from animal to human, including differences in pathophysiology of severely brain-injured patients and experimental animal models, are not absolutely clear. One difference in brain injury mechanism is the effect of anesthesia. The direct brain injury mechanisms such as necrosis, ischemia, brain edema, intracranial pressure (ICP) elevation, and nonspecific brain damage caused by neuroexcitation apoptosis are not so different between clinical patient s and experimental animal models [1,5,10,11]. However, systemic stress reaction is more severe in patients than in experimental animal models, because stress-associated neurohormonal reaction is limited under anesthesia. In experimental animal studies, harmful stress-associated neurohormonal reactions caused by stimulation of the hypothalamus-pituitary- adrenal (HPA) [2,3] and hypothalamus-pituitary- thyroid axis are prevent ed by anesthesia.

Keywords

Experimental Animal Model Experimental Animal Study Severe Brain Damage Brain Hypothermia Experimental Laboratory Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Baker AJ, Zornow MH, Scheller MS, Yaksh TL, Skilling SR, Smullin DH, Larson AA, Kuczenski R (1991) Changes in extracellular concentrations of glutamate, aspartate, glycine, dopamine, serotonin, and dopamine metabolites after transient global ischemia in the rat. J Neuro Chem 57:1370–1379Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chiolero R, Lemarchand TH, Schutz Y, de Tribolet N, Felber JP, Freeman J, Jequier E (1988) Plasma pituitary hormone levels in severe trauma with or without head injury. J Trauma 28:1368–1374PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Corte FD, Mancini A, Valle D, Gallizzi F, Carducci P, Mignani V, De Marinis L (1998) Provocative hypothalamopituitary axis tests in severe head injury: correlations with severity and prognosis. Crit Care Med 26:1419–1426PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Globus MY-T, Ginsberg MD, Haris SI, Busto R, Dietrich WD (1987) Role of dopa mine in ischemic striatal injury. Neurology 37:1712–1719PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Globus MY-T, Busto R, Dietrich WD, Martinez E, Valdes I, Ginsberg MD (1998) Effect on ischemia on the in vivo release of striatal dopamine, glutamate, and γ-aminobutyric acid studied by intracerebral microdialysis. J Neurochem 51:1455–1464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hayashi N (1997) Prevention of vegetation after severe head trauma and stroke by combination therapy of cerebral hypothermia and activation of immune-dopaminergic nervous system. Proceedings of the 6th annual meeting of Society for Treatment of Coma 6:133–145Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hayashi N (2000) Enhanced neuron al damage in severely brain injured patients by hypothalamus, pituitary, and adrenal axis neuro-hormonal changes. In: Hayashi N (ed) Brain hypothermia. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo pp 3–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hayashi N (2000) The clinical issue and effectiveness of bra in hypothermia treatment for severe brain injured patients. In: Hayashi N (ed) Brain hypothermia. Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo, pp 121–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kossmann T, Hans V, Lenzlinger PM, Csuka E, Stsahel PF, Trentz O, Morgani-Kossmann MC (1996) Analysis of immune mediator production following traumatic brain injury. In: Schlag G, Redel H, Traber D (eds) Shock, sepsis and organ failure. Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo, pp 263–297Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Maclntosh TK (1994) Neurological sequele of traumatic brain injury: therapeutic implications. Cerebrovasc Brain Metab Rev 6:109–162Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Silvka A, Coben G (1985) Hydroxyl radical attack on dopamine. J Bioi Chem 260:15466–15472Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nariyuki Hayashi
    • 1
    • 2
  • Dalton W. Dietrich
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Nihon University Emergency Medical CenterTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Department of Emergency and Critical Care MedicineNihon University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
  3. 3.Department of Neurological Surgery, Neurology and Cell Biology and AnatomyUniversity of Miami School of MedicineMiamiUSA
  4. 4.The Miami Project to Cure ParalysisMiamiUSA

Personalised recommendations