Evolutionary Agent-Based Model for Double-Loop Learning

  • Shingo Takahashi
  • Kyoichi Kijima
  • Ryo Sato


Since Barnard [5] defined a formal organization as a cooperative system, systems approaches have been applied to the research of organizations. In particular, theoretical developments of modern organization theory could not be effectively obtained without the basis of systems theory. For example, some core notions in organization theory, such as organizational contribution, behavior, performance, and management, correspond to the notions in systems theory such as input, process, output, and feedback, respectively. Beer’s cybernetic approach [6] to organizations can be regarded as a paradigm of organization system models.


Genetic Algorithm Decision Variable Payoff Function Organizational Learning Internal Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Argyris C (1999) On organizational learning, 2nd edn. BlackwellGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Argyris C, Schon DA (1996) Organizational learning II. Addison-WesleyGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Axelrod R (1997) The complexity of cooperation: agent-based models of competition and collaboration. Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ashby WR (1960) Design for a brain, 2nd edn. Chapman and HallMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barnard CI (1938) The functions of the executive. Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Beer S (1981) Brain of the firm, 2nd edn. ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bowler TD (1981) General systems thinking, its scope and applicability. Elsevier, North HollandGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Carley KM, Gasser L (1999) Computational organization theory. In: Weiss G (ed) Multiagent systems. MIT PressGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Checkland P (1981) Systems thinking, systems practice. WileyGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Connant RC, Ashby WR (1970) Every good regulator of a system must be a model of that system. Int J Systems Sc 1:89–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dawid H (1999) Adaptive learning by genetic algorithms—analytical results and applications to economic models 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Espejo R, Schuhmann W, Schwaninger M, et al. (1996) Organizational transformation and learning—a cybernetic approach to management. WileyGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gaylord RJ, DAndria LJ (1998) Simulating society—a mathematical toolkit for modeling socioeconomic behavior. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hanappi H (1994) Evolutionary economics. AveburyGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Holland JH (1992) Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. MIT PressGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kijima K (ed) (1997) Multifaceted multimedia social system (in Japanese). Nikka-girenGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mesarovic MD, Takahara Y (1989) Abstract systems theory. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mesarovic MD, Macko D, Takahara Y (1975) Theory of hierarchical, multilevel systems. Academic, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Morimoto M (1987) Organization theory (in Japanese). Open Air University PublicationGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Prietula MJ, Carley KM, Gasser L (eds) (1998) Simulating organizations. MIT PressGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Shiozawa Y (1997) Consequences of complexity (in Japanese). NTT PublicationGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shiozawa Y (2000) Evolution as method (in Japanese). Japan Association of Evolutionary EconomicsGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Takahashi S (1991) The meaning of the Gödel’s incompleteness theorem for structural change of systems. Proceedings of 17th Systems Symposium of SICE, pp 443–450Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Takahashi S (1998) Learning by information production in hypergame-type social system. Journal of Japan Association of Evolutionary Economics 2:314–322Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Takahashi S (2000) Evolutionary learning in agent-based modeling. International Conference on AI, Simulation and ModelingGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Takahashi S (2001) Evolutionary learning in agent-based modeling. In: Sarjoughian HS, Celler RE (eds) Discrete event modeling and simulation technologies, pp 297–314Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Takahashi S, Takahara Y (1995) Logical approach to systems theory. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Takahashi S, Hinago T, Inohara T, et al. (1999) Evolutionary approach to three-person hypergame situation. IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and CyberneticsGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Weibull JW (1996) Evolutionary game theory. MIT PressGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Weiss G (ed) (1999) Multiagent systems—a modern approach to distributed artificial intelligence. MIT PressGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Yamada S (1997) Adaptive agent (in Japanese). Kyoritsu ShuppanGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Zeigler B, Praehofer H, Kim TG (2000) Theory of modeling and simulation, 2nd edn. AcademicGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shingo Takahashi
    • 1
  • Kyoichi Kijima
    • 2
  • Ryo Sato
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Science and EngineeringWaseda UniversityShinjuku-ku, TokyoJapan
  2. 2.Faculty of Decision Science and TechnologyTokyo Institute of TechnologyMeguro-ku, TokyoJapan
  3. 3.Institute of Policy and Planning SciencesThe University of TsukubaTsukuba, IbarakiJapan

Personalised recommendations