Trust pp 79-105 | Cite as

Trust and Commitment Formation

Part of the The Science of the Mind book series (The Science of the Mind)


In Chap. 5, I tested the emancipation theory of trust by analyzing the results of the USA–Japan comparative questionnaire study. The results generally supported the theory. However, a questionnaire survey is not the most appropriate method for testing a theory that consists of a series of propositions. In this chapter, I present a series of experimental studies that we conducted to test the theory. Although most of the experiments presented in this chapter were conducted in both the USA and Japan, the purpose was not to claim that there is a so-called “cultural difference” between the USA and Japan. Rather, the purpose was to test the validity of the theory, on the premise that any “cultural differences” would disappear once we controlled the variables that play critical roles in the theory. More detailed discussion of this point will appear later in this chapter.


General Trust American Participant Trust Game High Truster Commitment Relationship 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Cash TF, Stack JJ, Lune GC (1975) Convergent and discriminant behavioral aspects of interpersonal trust. Psychol Rep 37:983–986Google Scholar
  2. Cook KS, Emerson RM (1978) Power, equity and commitment in exchange networks. Am Sociol Rev 43(5):721–739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dasgupta P (1988) Trust as a commodity. In: Gambetta D (ed) Trust: making and breaking cooperative relations. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp 49–72Google Scholar
  4. Hayashi N (1993) From Tit-for-Tat to Out-for-Tat. Sociol Theory Methods 8(1):19–32 (in Japanese with an English abstract)Google Scholar
  5. Hayashi N (1995) Emergence of cooperation in one-shot prisoner’s dilemmas and the role of trust. Jpn J Psychol 66(3):184–190 (in Japanese with an English abstract)Google Scholar
  6. Hayashi N, Yamagishi T (1997) A socio-relational basis of “irrational” cooperation: an experimental study. Jpn J Psychol 67(6):444–451 (in Japanese with an English abstract)Google Scholar
  7. Hayashi N, Yamagishi T (1998) Selective play: choosing partners in an uncertain world. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 2(4):276–289PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hayashi N, Jin N, Yamagishi T (1993) Prisoner’s dilemma network: a computer simulation of strategies. Res Soc Psychol 8(1):33–43 (in Japanese with an English abstract)Google Scholar
  9. Jin N, Hayashi N, Shinotsuka H (1993) An experimental study of prisoner’s dilemma network: the formation of commitment in selective dyads. Jpn J Exp Soc Psychol 33(1):21–30 (in Japanese with an English abstract)Google Scholar
  10. Kiyonari T, Yamagishi T (1996) Distrusting outsiders as a consequence of commitment formation. Jpn J Exp Soc Psychol 36(1):56–67 (in Japanese with an English abstract)Google Scholar
  11. Kiyonari T, Yamagishi T (1999) A comparative study of trust and trustworthiness using the game of enthronement. Jpn J Soc Psychol 15(2):100–109 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  12. Kollock P (1994) The emergence of exchange structures: an experimental study of uncertainty, commitment, and trust. Am J Soc 100(2):313–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Snijders C (1996) Trust and commitments. Interuniversity Center for Social Science Theory and Methodology, Utrecht, the NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  14. Yamagishi T, Hayashi N (1996) Selective play: social embeddedness of social dilemmas. In: Liebrand WBG, Messick DM (eds) Frontiers in social dilemma research. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 363–384Google Scholar
  15. Yamagishi T, Hayashi N, Jin N (1994) Prisoner’s dilemma network: selection strategy versus action strategy. In: Schulz U, Alberts W, Müeller U (eds) Social dilemmas and cooperation. Springer, Berlin, pp 233–250Google Scholar
  16. Yamagishi T, Yamagishi M, Takahashi N, Hayashi N, Watabe M (1995) Trust and commitment formation. Jpn J Exp Soc Psychol 35(1):23–34 (in Japanese with an English abstract)Google Scholar
  17. Yamagishi T, Cook KS, Watabe M (1998a) Uncertainty, trust and commitment formation in the United States and Japan. Am J Sociol 104(1):165–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Behavioral Science Graduate School of LettersHokkaido UniversitySapporoJapan

Personalised recommendations