Trust pp 21-35 | Cite as

Conceptual Clarifications

Part of the The Science of the Mind book series (The Science of the Mind)


In Chap. 2, I presented three paradoxes of trust. In so doing, however, I did not define the central concept, trust. There was a reason not to do so. It is because the three paradoxes would no longer be paradoxes once a clear definition of trust was provided. The purpose of Chap.  3 is to explain this point by sorting out various concepts related to trust. This will show us that the paradoxes are generated by our failure to distinguish various conceptually independent aspects of the term, trust.


Character Trait General Trust Power Company High Truster Moral Order 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Bacharach M, Gambetta D (1997) Trust in signs. Oxford University, MimeoGoogle Scholar
  2. Barber B (1983) The logic and limit of trust. Rutgers University Press, New BrunswickGoogle Scholar
  3. Kaplan RM (1973) Components of trust: note on use of Rotter’s scale. Psychol Rep 33:13–14Google Scholar
  4. Luhmann N (1979) Trust and power. Wiley, Chichester, UKGoogle Scholar
  5. Watabe M, Haruna Y, Kitada A (1994) The structure of trust in the safety of nuclear power generation. INSS J 1:69–92Google Scholar
  6. Yamagishi T (1988a) The provision of a sanctioning system in the United States and Japan. Soc Psychol Q 51(3):265–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Yamagishi T, Komiyama H (1995) Significance and the structure of trust: theoretical and empirical research on trust and commitment relations. INSS J 2:1–59 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  8. Yamagishi M, Yamagishi T (1989) Trust, commitment, and the development of network structures. Paper presented at the workshop for the “Beyond Bureaucracy Research Project,” Hong Kong, December 18–21Google Scholar
  9. Yamagishi T, Yamagishi M (1994) Trust and commitment in the United States and Japan. Motiv Emot 18(2):129–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Yamagishi T, Yamagishi M, Takahashi N, Hayashi N, Watabe M (1995) Trust and commitment formation. Jpn J Exp Soc Psychol 35(1):23–34 (in Japanese with an English abstract)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Behavioral Science Graduate School of LettersHokkaido UniversitySapporoJapan

Personalised recommendations