Skip to main content

An existence result and a characterization of the least concave utility of homothetic preferences

  • Chapter
Advances in Mathematical Economics

Part of the book series: Advances in Mathematical Economics ((MATHECON,volume 15))

Abstract

This note shows that a utility function of a homothetic preference relation satisfying u(0) = 0 is a least concave utility function if and only if it is homogeneous of degree one.

Received: July 24, 2010

Received: October 22, 2010

JEL classification: D11

Mathematics Subject Classification (2010): 91B16, 91B08

We are grateful to Toru Maruyama and an anonymous referee for helpful comments and suggestions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The definition of homothetic preference is in the next section.

  2. 2.

    The uniqueness up to a positive affine transformation means the following fact: if both u 1 and u 2 are the least concave utility function, then there exist some a > 0 and b such that \({u}_{1} = a{u}_{2} + b\).

  3. 3.

    Since Ω is convex and w is continuous, w(Ω) must be connected. In general, any connected subset of is convex. Therefore, we have w(Ω) is convex.

  4. 4.

    The condition P is so mild that we could not find any example in which P = , except a trivial example: P = if xy for any x, yΩ.

  5. 5.

    This result is partially shown in Kihlstrom and Mirman [3].

  6. 6.

    It can be shown by the same argument as the proof of Proposition 3.C.1 of Mas-Colell, Whinston and Green [4].

  7. 7.

    It can be verify by the same argument as Exercise 2-1 of Stokey and Lucas [5].

References

  1. Debreu, G.: Least concave utility functions. J. Math. Econ. 3, 121–129 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kannai, Y.: The ALEP definition of complementarity and least concave utility functions. J. Econ. Theory 22, 115–117 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kihlstrom, R.E., Mirman, L.J.: Constant, increasing, and decreasing risk aversion with many commodities. Rev. Econ. Stud. 48, 271–280 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mas-Colell, A., Whinston, M.D., Green, J.R.: Microeconomic Theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Stokey, N., Lucas, R.: Recursive Methods in Economic Dynamics. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA (1989)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuhki Hosoya .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hosoya, Y. (2011). An existence result and a characterization of the least concave utility of homothetic preferences. In: Kusuoka, S., Maruyama, T. (eds) Advances in Mathematical Economics. Advances in Mathematical Economics, vol 15. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-53930-8_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics