Effectiveness of Using Elastomeric Pads to Mitigate Impact Vibration at an Urban Turnout Crossing

  • S. Kaewunruen
Part of the Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics and Multidisciplinary Design book series (NNFM, volume 118)


A turnout is a structural track system used to divert a train to other directions or other tracks. A turnout system includes rails, switches, crossings (special track components), steel plates, rubber pads, biscuits, fasteners, screw spikes, concrete bearers, ballast and formation. The wheel rail contact over the crossing transfer zone has a dip-like shape where the wheel trajectory is not smooth. The wheel/rail interaction with such imperfect contact transfer can cause detrimental impact loads on the railway track and its components. In addition, the large impact emits disturbing noises (either impact or ground-borne noise) to railway neighbors.

A methodology to reduce the wheel/rail impact at a turnout crossing is to adopt more resilient elastomeric pads. The functions of the turnout rubber pads are quite similar to those of plain-track rail pads. Nonetheless, it is important to note that the stiffness of a turnout structure is considerably higher than that of a plain track. As a result, it is desirable that the turnout pads should be softer than general rail pads, in order to moderate global track stiffness as well as to attenuate a higher impact force due to the wheel/rail interaction over the crossing transfer zone (dip-like trajectory). A trial of such methodology has been implemented at an urban turnout diamond in RailCorp’s urban rail network and the effectiveness of such a method has then been evaluated using integrated numerical train/track simulations, axle box acceleration and ride quality data obtained from the calibrated track inspection vehicle “AK Car”. The field trial demonstrates that using more resilient elastomeric pads in an urban turnout is effective in mitigating impact vibration and upgrading passenger ride comfort. However, it is important to note that an overly soft or hard pad is not recommended because it tends to reduce lives of other adjacent track components.


Impact Force Railway Track Wheel Rail Contact Disturbing Noise Peak Impact Force 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Andersson, C., Dahlberg, T.: Wheel/rail impacts at a railway turnout crossing. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit. 212F, 135–146 (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wu, T.X., Thompson, D.J.: On the impact noise generation due to a wheel passing over rail joints. Journal of Sound and Vibration 267(3), 485–496 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Remennikov, A.M., Kaewunruen, S.: A review of loading conditions for railway track structures due to train and track vertical interaction. Structural Control and Health Monitoring 15(2), 207–234 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kaewunruen, S., Remennikov, A.M.: Dynamic properties of railway track and its components: recent findings and future research direction. Insight: Non-Destructive Testing and Condition Monitoring 52(1), 20–22 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Thompson, D.J.: Railway Noise and Vibration. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jenkins, H.H., Stephenson, J.E., Clayton, G.A., Morland, J.W., Lyon, D.: The effect of track and vehicle parameters on wheel/rail vertical dynamic forces. Railway Eng. Journal, 2–16 (1974)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Railtrack PLC: RT/CE/S/012 Specification of Cast Austentic Manganese Steel Crossings, Railtrack PLC (February 2002) Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kaewunruen, S., Remennikov, A.M.: Dynamic flexural influence on a railway concrete sleeper in track system due to a single wheel impact. Eng. Failure Analysis 16(3), 705–712 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kaewunruen, S.: Performance Review of Elastomeric Pads in Turnout. RailCorp. Technical Report No TR159. 66 p, Sydney, Australia (2009) Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Standards Australia: AS1085.19 Railway fastening assemblies, Sydney, Australia (2001) Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sun, Y.Q., Cole, C., McClanachan, M., Wilson, A., Kaewunruen, S., Kerr, M.B.: Rail short-wavelength irregularity identification based on wheel-rail impact response measurements and simulations. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Heavy Haul Conference, Shanghai, China, June 21-23 (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    RailCorp Rolling Stock Engineering: Minimum Operating Standards for Rolling Stock, Sydney, Australia (2010) Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Kaewunruen
    • 1
  1. 1.Track EngineeringRail CorporationSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations