Advertisement

Human Response to Groundborne Noise and Vibration in Buildings Caused by Rail Transit: Summary of the TCRP D-12 Study

  • Jeffrey A. Zapfe
  • Hugh Saurenman
  • Sanford Fidell
Part of the Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics and Multidisciplinary Design book series (NNFM, volume 118)

Summary

Ground vibration produced by rail transit systems can be annoying to nearby building occupants when they perceive some combination of feelable vibration, re-radiated sound, and vibration-induced rattling of household paraphernalia. Community response to rail-induced ground vibration has not been extensively researched. While the well-known Schultz dosage-—response curve is routinely used to predict the prevalence of annoyance produced by airborne transportation noise, no similar relationship has gained widespread acceptance for groundborne noise and vibration. The principal goal of the present study was to develop a dosage response relationship for predicting community annoyance due to ground vibration produced by rail transit systems. The research was conducted as part of the Transit Cooperative Research Program D-12 project. Telephone interviews were conducted with 1306 individuals in five North American cities. Field measurements were made in each city to estimate vibration and noise exposure at each interview location. The work produced several dosage-—response relationships between vibration/noise exposure and annoyance. When compared to the current noise and vibration criteria specified by the United States Federal Transit Administration (FTA), the dosage response analysis predicted a probability of 0.05 to 0.10 that a D-12 respondent would be highly annoyed by vibration and noise at the current FTA criterion levels.

Keywords

Sound Pressure Level Transit System Ground Vibration Vibration Level Vibration Measurement 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Schultz, T.J.: Synthesis of Social Surveys on Noise Annoyance. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 64(2), 377–405 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mechanical vibration and shock - Evaluation of human exposure to whole-body vibration,” IS0 2631-1 (1997): Part 1: General requirements, ISO 2631-2 (2003): Part 2: Continuous and shock-induced vibrations in buildings (1 to 80 Hz)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment, Federal Transit Administration, FTA-VA-90-1003-06 (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Woodroof, H.J., Griffin, M.J.: A Survey of the Effect of Railway-induced Building Vibration on the Community, University of Southampton, ISVR Tech. Rpt. to British Rail Tech. Ctr., Derby (1986)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Öhrström, E.: Effects of Exposure to Railway Noise – A Comparison Between Areas With and Without Vibration. Journal of Sound and Vibration 205(4), 555–560 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Turunen-Risem, I.H., Brekke, A., et al.: Vibration in Dwellings from Road and Rail Traffic – Part I: A New Norwegian Measurement Standard and Classification System. Applied Acoustics 64, 71–87 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Klæboe, R., et al.: Vibration in Dwellings from Road and Rail Traffic – Part II: Exposure-effect Relationships Based on Ordinal Logit and Logistic Regression Models. Applied Acoustics 64, 89–109 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Klæboe, R., et al.: Vibration in Dwellings from Road and Rail Traffic – Part III: Towards a Common Methodology for Socio-Vibrational Surveys. Applied Acoustics 64, 111–120 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Human Response to Vibration in Residential Environments, NANR172, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London, UK (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fidell, S., et al.: Relationship between low-frequency aircraft noise and annoyance due to rattle and vibration. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 111(4), 1743–1750 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tabachnick, B., Fidell, L.: Using Multivariate Statistics, 5th edn. Allyn and Bacon, Boston (2007)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Federal Agency Review of Selected Airport Noise Analysis Issues, Federal Interagency Committee on Noise, FICON (1992)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeffrey A. Zapfe
    • 1
  • Hugh Saurenman
    • 2
  • Sanford Fidell
    • 3
  1. 1.Acentech IncorporatedCambridgeUSA
  2. 2.ATS ConsultingLos AngelesUSA
  3. 3.Fidell Associates, Inc.Woodland HillsUSA

Personalised recommendations